Intel Core i7-2637M vs Intel Core i7-2860QM

Intel Core i7-2637M

► remove

The Intel Core i7-2637M is power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processor for thin and light laptops. The base frequency of 1.7 GHz is relatively low, but due to Turbo Boost 2.0, the CPU may clock up to 2.8 GHz (on core loaded, 2.5 GHz with both cores loaded). However, this depends on the cooling and power consumption of the laptop. Due to HyperThreading, the i7-2637M is able to handle 4 threads in parallel. Compared to the slower i7-2617M, the 2637M offers a higher clock speed (processor core and turbo, graphics turbo).

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most notable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 clocked at 350 or 1200MHz (Turbo Boost). Due to the slower clock rate without the Turbo, compared to HD Graphics 3000 in 35W and 45W processors (usually clocked at 650 base speed in non LV processors), the performance should be noticeable lower.

The performance of the CPU should be a bit higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost frequencies, the performance should be similar to the Core i3-2310M. However, the laptop cooling system has to keep the processor relatively cool for the Turbo Boost to work often.

The TDP of 17W (includes the integrated GPU and memory controller) allows the use of the 2637M CPU in small subnotebooks.

Intel Core i7-2860QM

► remove Intel 2860QM

The Intel Core i7-2860QM is a fast high-end quad core processor for laptops and successor to the Core i7-2820QM. At the time of announcement (Sept. 2011) it was the fastest 45 Watt processor and even beats the older Core 7-2920XM. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 8 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the previous Clarksdale quad-cores, the i7-2860QM is now manufactured in 32nm and offers an integrated graphics card and AES functions. Compared to the slower clocked 2760QM, the 2860QM also offers more level 3 cache (8 vs. 6MB).

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements are the new 256Bit AVX instructions, the improved Turbo Boost and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. Furthermore, the integrated memory controller was improved and supports up to 8 GB DDR3-1333.

The i7-2860QM offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which proved to be clearly faster than the old Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs and on a level with entry level dedicated graphics cards like the GeForce 310M. The HD Graphics 3000 also supports Turbo Boost and clocks between 650 MHz and 1300 MHz in the i7-2820QM (which should be similar to the 2860QM). As the graphics card shares the fast last level cache, the processor is a bit slower with activated GPU.

The performance of the Core i7-2860QM should be above the former fastest mobile CPU, the Core i7-2920XM. Therefore, the performance should be sufficient for modern 3D games and demanding applications. Thanks to the fast Turbo Boost 2.0 even single threaded applications run very fast.

The relative high TDP rating of the 2860QM of 45 Watt enables the usage of the quad core only in 15" laptops and up. However, compared to the previous generation of quad-cores, the TDP improved, as the integrated GPU is now included.

Intel Core i7-2637MIntel Core i7-2860QM
Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Core i7 Sandy Bridge
Intel Core i7-2960XM (compare)2700 - 3700 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2860QM2500 - 3600 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2920XM (compare)2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2760QM (compare)2400 - 3500 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2820QM (compare)2300 - 3400 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2720QM (compare)2200 - 3300 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2675QM (compare)2200 - 3100 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2670QM (compare)2200 - 3100 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2635QM (compare)2000 - 2900 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2630QM (compare)2000 - 2900 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2640M (compare)2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2620M (compare)2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2649M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2629M (compare)2100 - 3000 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2677M (compare)1800 - 2900 MHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Core i7-2637M1700 - 2800 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2657M (compare)1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2617M (compare)1500 - 2600 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2960XM (compare)2700 - 3700 MHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-2860QM2500 - 3600 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2920XM (compare)2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2760QM (compare)2400 - 3500 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2820QM (compare)2300 - 3400 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-2720QM (compare)2200 - 3300 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2675QM (compare)2200 - 3100 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2670QM (compare)2200 - 3100 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2635QM (compare)2000 - 2900 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2630QM (compare)2000 - 2900 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-2640M (compare)2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2620M (compare)2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2649M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2629M (compare)2100 - 3000 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2677M (compare)1800 - 2900 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2637M1700 - 2800 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2657M (compare)1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-2617M (compare)1500 - 2600 MHz2 / 44 MB
1700 - 2800 MHz2500 - 3600 MHz
128 KB256 KB
512 KB1 MB
4 MB8 MB
2 / 44 / 8
17 45
624 995
32 32
149 mm2216 mm2
100 °C100 °C
BGA1023
Turbo Boost 2.0, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d), Trusted Execution, AES, Intel 64, Anti-Theft, My WiFi, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitorin, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics 3000, DDR-1333 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1300 MHz)
$289 U.S.$568 U.S.
Intel Core i7 2637M

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
201 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
93 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
2.2 Points (5%)
5.9 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
1.1 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 3529     avg: 3578     median: 3600 (37%)     max: 3605 Points
min: 4515     avg: 4576     median: 4576 (47%)     max: 4637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 7046     avg: 7068.7     median: 7074 (11%)     max: 7086 Points
min: 16700     avg: 16809.5     median: 16809 (26%)     max: 16919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 8430     avg: 8639     median: 8722 (11%)     max: 8765 Points
min: 20290     avg: 20328     median: 20328 (27%)     max: 20366 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 4464     avg: 4469     median: 4471 (42%)     max: 4472 Points
min: 5639     avg: 5719.5     median: 5719 (53%)     max: 5800 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 690     avg: 744     median: 765 (9%)     max: 776 seconds
278.1 seconds (3%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 20     avg: 21.2     median: 21 (4%)     max: 21 seconds
7.8 seconds (2%)
WinRAR - Result
min: 2286     avg: 2324.5     median: 2324 (27%)     max: 2363 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
min: 11     avg: 12.1     median: 12 (7%)     max: 12 fps
32 fps (18%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
min: 68     avg: 70.1     median: 69 (25%)     max: 72 fps
131.7 fps (47%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0.5 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
1.2 GB/s (6%)
2.7 GB/s (14%)
Blender 2.79 *
996 Seconds (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2814     avg: 2836     median: 2834 (19%)     max: 2860 Points
min: 6273     avg: 6323     median: 6323 (42%)     max: 6373 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 13     avg: 14     median: 14 (3%)     max: 14 Seconds
10.3 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 31     avg: 32.3     median: 32 (1%)     max: 33 Seconds
23.5 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 735     avg: 755     median: 757 (3%)     max: 772 Seconds
min: 587     avg: 590.1     median: 590 (3%)     max: 593 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
45450 MIPS (22%)
min: 111300     avg: 115310     median: 115310 (55%)     max: 119320 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
29870 MFLOPS (23%)
min: 72360     avg: 73330     median: 73330 (56%)     max: 74300 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
6.9 points (99%)
7.6 points (109%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 7546     avg: 7733     median: 7552 (11%)     max: 8101 Points
21417 Points (30%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
3258 points (17%)
7590 points (39%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
27910 Points (18%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
29096 Points (34%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
2382 Points (6%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
3294 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
4566 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
2288 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
4800 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2703 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2769 Points (44%)
3508 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
5048 Points (9%)
11209 Points (19%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
16640 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 2637M +
29.1 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 2637M +
30.5 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-2637M → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-2860QM → 179%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)