Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a high-end desktop processor with 6 cores (12 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the second fastest Ryzen CPU behind the Ryzen 7 2700X. The CPU cores clock at 3.6 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.2 GHz. All 6 cores and 12 threads can clock up to 3.9 GHz. The 6 cores are divided in two cluster (3 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1600X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600XAMD Ryzen 5 2600
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5
CodenameZen+Pinnacle Riege (Zen+)
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz3400 - 3900 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB3 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP95 Watt65 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4940 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
Die Size209.78 mm2213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)AM4 (LGA1331)
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Architecturex86
$229 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.95 °C
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600X
31 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600
29.7 pt (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
421 Points (47%)
380 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2688 Points (7%)
2793 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1341 Points (8%)
min: 1245     avg: 1254     median: 1248 (8%)     max: 1270 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
163 Points (49%)
min: 155.9     avg: 157.4     median: 157.3 (47%)     max: 159 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.6 Points (19%)
13.7 Points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (45%)
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4958 Points (30%)
4726 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
29954 Points (22%)
28173 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
48146 Points (33%)
45033 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8272 Points (10%)
8024 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
133.8 s (2%)
140.9 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
5.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4599 Points (7%)
4517 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
33222 MIPS (19%)
30898 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4293 MIPS (51%)
4020 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (28%)
75 fps (26%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
207.4 fps (48%)
205.3 fps (47%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.3 fps (15%)
min: 7.79     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 7.82 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8 GB/s (21%)
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 350     avg: 352     median: 352 (2%)     max: 353.9 Seconds
min: 374.2     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 375.7 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R5 2600 +
9290 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
11.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.8 s (1%)
24.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
616 s (3%)
615 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
45760 Points (40%)
43794 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12074 Points (33%)
12405 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73430 Points (60%)
69692 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73424 Points (60%)
69478 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74442 Points (63%)
70522 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11855 Points (30%)
11219 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18091 Points (32%)
17063 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6530 Points (28%)
6265 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1066     avg: 1145     median: 1144.5 (48%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 1014     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5816     avg: 6094     median: 6094 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
min: 5767     avg: 6070     median: 6069.5 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1067 Points (5%)
1020 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5939 Points (19%)
5885 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4577     avg: 4642     median: 4641.5 (46%)     max: 4706 Points
min: 4631     avg: 5109     median: 5109 (51%)     max: 5587 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21616     avg: 22301     median: 22301 (25%)     max: 22986 Points
min: 20633     avg: 23018     median: 23018 (26%)     max: 25403 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
884 ms (1%)
951 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (39%)
179 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
171.7 Watt (30%)
103%
1 R5 2600 +
157.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
164.4 Watt (30%)
104%
1 R5 2600 +
149.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)
104%
1 R5 2600 +
8.5 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600X → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 97% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 13:32:25

#0 checking url part for id 9980 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10032 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.018s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.021s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.015s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10032 +0.018s ... 0.072s

#9 got single benchmarks 10032 +0.012s ... 0.084s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.371s ... 0.455s

#12 return log +0.036s ... 0.491s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)