, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-2308M vs Intel Core i3-2328M

Intel Core i3-2308M

► remove from comparison Intel 2308M

The Intel Core i3-2308M is a dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i5, the i3 does not offer the Turbo Boost technique for the CPU part and is therefore clocked at 2.1 GHz (max).

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements are the new 256Bit AVX instructions, the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. The CPU is similar to the Core i3-2310M, but does not support Intel's Small Business Advantage tools, such as USB blocker, PC health check, data backup and wireless display (according to CPU World).

Der i3-2308M offers an integrated graphics card ( Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2308M it is clocked from  650-1100MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture, the average performance of the Core i3-2308M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i3 without Turbo Boost. In synthetic benchmarks, the performance was about on par with the faster clocked Core i5-430M (2.3-2.5 GHz) and therefore adequate for most applications.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i3-2328M

► remove from comparison Intel 2328M

The Intel Core i3-2328M is a dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i5, the i3 does not offer the Turbo Boost technique for the CPU part and is therefore clocked at 2.2 GHz (max). Compared to the Core i3-2310M, the 2328M offers only 100 MHz more core clock rate. The CPU is similar to the Core i3-2330M, but does not support Intel's Small Business Advantage tools, such as USB blocker, PC health check, data backup and wireless display.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements are the new 256Bit AVX instructions, the improved Turbo Boost 2.0 (not enabled for the processor part of the 2328M) and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core.

The i3-2328M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2328M it is clocked from  650-1100MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture, the average performance of the Core i3-2328M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i3 without Turbo Boost. In synthetic benchmarks, the performance is about on par with the faster clocked Core i3-380M (2.5 GHz) and therefore adequate for most applications.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i3-2308MIntel Core i3-2328M
Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Core i3 Sandy Bridge
Intel Core i3-2370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2350M compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2348M compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2330M compare2.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2328M2.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2312M compare2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2310M compare2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-2308M2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2377M compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2375M compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2367M compare1.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2365M compare1.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2357M compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2350M compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2348M compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2330M compare2.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-2328M2.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2312M compare2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2310M compare2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2308M2.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2377M compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2375M compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2367M compare1.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2365M compare1.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-2357M compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
2100 MHz2200 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
35 35
624 624
32 32
149 mm2149 mm2
85 (PGA); 100(BGA) °C
rPGA988B / BGA1023
HD Graphics 3000 (650-1100MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 3000 (650-1100MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core i3 2328M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2.01     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (4%)     max: 2.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2328M +
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (28%)     max: 0.88 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2764     avg: 2864     median: 2880 (26%)     max: 2912
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 6098     avg: 6433     median: 6475 (10%)     max: 6551
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 7398     avg: 7794     median: 7826 (7%)     max: 7981 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 3414     avg: 3560     median: 3582 (25%)     max: 3600 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 2328M +
min: 777.94     avg: 845     median: 800.7 (9%)     max: 1065.84 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 2328M +
min: 24.771     avg: 26.7     median: 25.2 (5%)     max: 32.91 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2328M +
2003 (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2328M +
11.8 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2328M +
62.2 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2328M +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2328M +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2328M +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2638     avg: 2694     median: 2697 (15%)     max: 2741 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 2328M +
min: 17.688     avg: 18     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18.595 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 2328M +
min: 39.909     avg: 40.4     median: 40.2 (2%)     max: 41.044 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 2328M +
min: 924.142     avg: 933     median: 927.7 (4%)     max: 951.992 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 37460     avg: 39557     median: 37820 (18%)     max: 43390 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 2328M +
min: 26610     avg: 26837     median: 26900 (21%)     max: 27000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2328M +
min: 5.8     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (79%)     max: 6.5 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 2328M +
min: 6842     avg: 6996     median: 7032 (8%)     max: 7052 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2277     avg: 2508     median: 2508 (9%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 2328M +
min: 22765     avg: 23526     median: 23131 (15%)     max: 24681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2035     avg: 2044     median: 2041 (5%)     max: 2057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 2328M +
min: 2821     avg: 2861     median: 2861 (7%)     max: 2901 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 2328M +
4385 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 2328M +
4009 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 2328M +
4616 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 2328M +
3998 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 2328M +
4255 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-2328M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 18. 06:26:17

#0 checking url part for id 3511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3504 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3511 +0s ... 0.014s

#7 got single benchmarks 3511 +0s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3504 +0s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 3504 +0.015s ... 0.03s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.042s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)