, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 212 APQ8009

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 is an entry level SoC for Android based tablets and smartphones. It contains four ARM Cortex-A7 CPU cores (quad core) with a clock rate of up to 1.3 GHz, an Adreno 304 graphics card, an LPDDR2/LPDDR3 memory controller (max. 533 MHz), a eMMC 4.5 port, but no 3G/LTE radio module.

The performance of the Cortex-A7 cores is rather low and positioned in the entry level of 2015. In our tests of the CAT S40 smartphone, daily tasks and browsing however imposed no problem for the SoC. 

The integrated Adreno 304 graphics card is clocked at 400 MHz and also positioned in the entry level. Therefore, demanding games may not run smoothly in high settings.

The integrated video engine allows the encoding and decoding of 1080p H.264 videos and decoding of H.265 videos. The main display can be driven with up to 1280x720 Pixels.

The SoC integrates Bluetooth 4.1 + BLE and 802.11n (2.4 GHz) WiFi.

The SoC is manufactured in a 28 nm LP process (at TSMC most likely). Due to the low energy consumption of the SoC it is also suited for small smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 200 8210

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM 8210 is an entry level SoC for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It contains two ARM Cortex A7 processor cores clocked at max 1.2 GHz. Furthermore the SoC (System on a Chip) includes a Adreno 302 graphics card, a 720p video en- and decoder, and a LPDDR2 memory controller.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Snapdragon 200 Cortex-A7
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80091.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 compare1.1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82101.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80091.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 compare1.1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82101.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
1300 MHz1200 MHz
4 / 42 / 2
28 28
Bluetooth 4.1, 802.11n (2.4 GHz) WLANUSB 2.0, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11n WLAN
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 304 (400 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 302
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 212 APQ8009Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 200 8210

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
6539 Points (4%)
min: 3939     avg: 4030     median: 4041.5 (3%)     max: 4075 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
6517 Points (7%)
min: 3578     avg: 3905     median: 4027 (4%)     max: 4033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 6786     avg: 6968     median: 6968 (7%)     max: 7150 Points
min: 4136     avg: 4246     median: 4262 (4%)     max: 4322 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1075 (2%)
min: 580     avg: 601     median: 604 (1%)     max: 609
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
331 (7%)
min: 315     avg: 323     median: 324.5 (7%)     max: 327
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
423 (5%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1118 (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
224 MFLOPS (8%)
min: 109.3     avg: 133     median: 144.2 (5%)     max: 145.528 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
55.9 MFLOPS (5%)
min: 54.5     avg: 69.1     median: 75.2 (7%)     max: 77.48 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 15228.5     avg: 17580     median: 18237.4 (31%)     max: 19274.5 ms
min: 16366.4     avg: 19148     median: 17651.2 (30%)     max: 28910 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 612.9     avg: 1161     median: 1245.9 (14%)     max: 1538.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1625.4     avg: 1649     median: 1648.6 (16%)     max: 1671.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1948     avg: 2225     median: 2152 (3%)     max: 2574 Points
min: 1166     avg: 1605     median: 1746 (3%)     max: 1904 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 12124     avg: 12761     median: 12811 (30%)     max: 13137 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
14033 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 22422     avg: 26397     median: 24924 (8%)     max: 31844 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 153     avg: 167     median: 166.5 (5%)     max: 180 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 3178     avg: 3181     median: 3181 (10%)     max: 3184 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 1295     avg: 3054     median: 3466 (0%)     max: 3641 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
2304 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2720     avg: 2915     median: 2914.5 (15%)     max: 3109 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 → 80% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 28. 02:38:14

#0 checking url part for id 8007 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5931 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8007 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 8007 +0.008s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5931 +0s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 5931 +0.011s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.037s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)