, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Pentium 2030M vs Intel Pentium 2127U

Intel Pentium 2030M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium 2030M is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part (HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync) are deactivated. The Pentium 2030M integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the desktop HD Graphics 2500.

The performance of the Pentium 2030M should be approximately 5% above a similar clocked Sandy Bridge CPU. Therefore, the 2030M should end up somewhat faster than the AMD A10-4600M.

The 35 W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the DDR3-1600 memory controller.

Intel Pentium 2127U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium 2127U is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual-core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture but many of its core features disabled like Turbo Boost, Virtualization VT-d, HyperThreading, AES and Trusted Execution. The Pentium 2127U integrates an Intel HD Graphics core (350 - 1100 MHz) that is based on the HD Graphics 2500.

The performance of the Pentium 2127U is slightly faster than a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge Pentium CPU. Therefore, the performance is slightly above that of the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU, the memory controller and the CPU cores. As a result, the 2127U is well-suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Pentium 2030MIntel Pentium 2127U
Intel PentiumIntel Pentium
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Pentium Ivy Bridge
» Intel Pentium 2030M2.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2020M compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2127U1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2117U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2129Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2030M2.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2020M compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium 2127U1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2117U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 2129Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
2500 MHz1900 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 17
22 22
90 °C105 °C
FCPGA988BGA1023
HD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$134 U.S.$134 U.S.
Intel Pentium 2030MIntel Pentium 2127U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2127U +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2127U +
0.8 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 2127U +
2625 (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 2127U +
5016 (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2127U +
6257 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2127U +
3305 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 2127U +
1266 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 2127U +
39.6 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2127U +
1810 (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2127U +
8.9 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2127U +
49.2 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2127U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2127U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2127U +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 2127U +
2027 Points (11%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 2127U +
20.4 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 2127U +
45.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 2127U +
1044 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 2127U +
23240 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 2127U +
14110 MFLOPS (11%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 2127U +
4896 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 2127U +
1782 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 2127U +
13888 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 2127U +
1243 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 2127U +
1718 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 2127U +
4588 Points (37%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 2127U +
3967 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 2127U +
3150 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 2127U +
2992 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 2127U +
3401 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium 2127U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 27. 03:50:36

#0 checking url part for id 3732 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4065 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3732 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 3732 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4065 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 4065 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.023s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)