2020 Razer Blade Stealth GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Laptop Review: Like the 2019 Version, But Done Right

Ultrabook powerhouse. After fumbling with the 2019 options, the 2020 Blade Stealth is what the 2019 version should have been especially in regards to the Ice Lake processor. The graphics potential is insane considering the small 13.3-inch chassis.

Allen Ngo 👁, Published 06/15/2020 🇵🇹 🇷🇺 ...

Left: Miicrosoft Surface Laptop 3, Right: Razer Blade Stealth

Razer introduced two Blade Stealth Core i7-1065G7 Ice Lake options last year: one 10 W version with GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics and one 25 W version with integrated Intel UHD Graphics. If you wanted the faster 25 W processor, you would have to sacrifice graphics performance and vice versa.

The 2020 version we have here addresses the compromise by pairing the 25 W CPU with dedicated GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics meaning users can now have their cake and eat it, too. This particular SKU is unique in the subnotebook world as the uncommon GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q allows it to play games far better than any other 13.3-inch laptop available at the moment. However, all that power in a small package comes with some drawbacks which we'll detail below.

The 2020 Blade Stealth currently retails for $1800 USD and $2000 USD with a 1080p120 and 4K60 display, respectively. The chassis design remains almost completely unchanged year-over-year and so we recommend checking out our existing reviews on the 2019 Blade Stealth for more information on the case, clickpad, ports, keyboard, speakers, and other physical features.

Direct competitors are far and few between since 13.3-inch laptops with GeForce GTX graphics are so rare. Potential buyers will still compare the Blade Stealth to other high-end subnotebooks nonetheless including the Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre 13, Asus ZenBook S13, Lenovo IdeaPad S940, Microsoft Surface Book 2, or the 14-inch MSI Prestige 14.

More Razer reviews:

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K (Blade Stealth Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake U

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1035 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, GDDR6, 446.14

Memory

16 GB

, 1866.7 MHz, 20-20-20-45, Dual-Channel

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 331 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, AUO272B, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Storage

Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.3 x 304.6 x 210 ( = 0.6 x 11.99 x 8.27 in)

Battery

53.1 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p IR

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.48 kg ( = 52.21 oz / 3.26 pounds), Power Supply: 570 g ( = 20.11 oz / 1.26 pounds)

Price

2000 USD

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.8 %	06/2020	Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	1.5 kg	15.3 mm	13.30"	3840x2160
88 %	05/2020	Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	1.2 kg	14.8 mm	13.40"	3840x2400
88.4 %	12/2019	HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	1.2 kg	16.9 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
86.6 %	05/2019	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150	1.1 kg	12.9 mm	13.90"	1920x1080
85 %	06/2019	Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620	1.2 kg	12 mm	14.00"	3840x2160
84.2 %	02/2020	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	1.3 kg	16 mm	14.00"	3840x2160

Case

MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD DIN A4 ❌

Communication

The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. We experienced no issues when paired with our Netgear RAX200 router.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1645 (1401^min - 1773^max) MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1484 (1342^min - 1614^max) MBit/s ∼90% +17%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1268 (1103^min - 1385^max) MBit/s ∼77%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1243 (1000^min - 1395^max) MBit/s ∼76% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1178 (1025^min - 1264^max) MBit/s ∼72% -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1479 (1450^min - 1501^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1388 (875^min - 1490^max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1349 (804^min - 1497^max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1251 (803^min - 1358^max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1242 (1133^min - 1283^max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1478 (1450-1501)

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1268 (1103-1385)

Webcam

ColorChecker Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: 9.67 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 22.47 ∆E

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K

Maintenance

2020 Blade Stealth with GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU

2019 Blade Stealth with GTX 1650 Max-Q for comparison. Cooling solution is unchanged

Input Devices

Keyboard

Much like the 2020 Blade 15, the Shift key has been elongated for easier typing. This is the easiest way to tell the 2020 Blade Stealth apart from earlier versions.

Display

HWiNFO is unable to pull the exact panel name yet again, but at least we can confirm that it is of AU Optronics origin similar to the one on the 2019 Blade Stealth. Response times, gamut, and contrast ratio are not all that different between the 2019 and 2020 models as a result. Our 2020 unit is using a different display controller than the one on the 2019 version (AUO272B vs. AUO202B).

The worst aspect of the 4K panel is its slow black-white and gray-gray response times. Normally, we wouldn't complain too much about this since Ultrabooks with 4K panels aren't targeted towards gamers. The Blade Stealth and its gaming-capable GPU, however, will indubitably attract a lot of gamers who may not be aware of the slow response times of the 4K display. Ghosting is very noticeable here and even distracting in fast-paced games like Overwatch or Rocket league.

Other than the slow response times, the glossy 4K touchscreen is otherwise crisp and even brighter than the 4K 2019 Blade Stealth. Note that the less expensive matte 1080p 120 Hz SKU will likely return very different results than what we've recorded below.

Bottom bezel is quite thick for a relatively low screen-to-body ratio of 77 percent

Edge-to-edge glossy glass touchscreen. Matte FHD is available


449.5 cd/m²	459.5 cd/m²	451.7 cd/m²
432.7 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	434 cd/m²
430.7 cd/m²	458.7 cd/m²	447.2 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO272B

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 467 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 447.9 cd/m² Minimum: 10.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 467 cd/m²
Contrast: 1197:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.04
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K AUO272B, IPS, 13.30, 3840x2160	Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 13.40, 3840x2400	HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160	Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080	Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 AUO202B, IPS LED, 13.30, 3840x2160
Display		1%	9%		3%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	63.7	64.5 1%	69.6 9%		65.5 3%	64.3 1%
sRGB Coverage	93.7	91.4 -2%	98.9 6%		96.3 3%	95.8 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.5	66.6 3%	71.5 11%		66.3 3%	65.7 2%
Response Times		30%	-3%	4%	5%	-7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	57.6 ?(28, 29.6)	41.6 ?(23.2, 18.4) 28%	60.8 ?(26, 34.8) -6%	55 ?(27, 28) 5%	57.6 ?(29.2, 28.4) -0%	62 ?(30, 32) -8%
Response Time Black / White *	37.2 ?(21.2, 16)	25.6 ?(15.6, 10) 31%	36.8 ?(15.6, 21.2) 1%	36 ?(22, 14) 3%	34 ?(17.6, 16.4) 9%	39 ?(24, 15) -5%
PWM Frequency					22730 ?(24)
Screen		-22%	-44%	8%	12%	-38%
Brightness middle	467	414 -11%	447.4 -4%	567 21%	429.8 -8%	353 -24%
Brightness	448	401 -10%	420 -6%	516 15%	403 -10%	335 -25%
Brightness Distribution	92	94 2%	85 -8%	86 -7%	89 -3%	90 -2%
Black Level *	0.39	0.28 28%	0.31 21%	0.445 -14%	0.32 18%	0.25 36%
Contrast	1197	1479 24%	1443 21%	1274 6%	1343 12%	1412 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	3.06 -46%	4.23 -101%	1.55 26%	1.08 49%	4.4 -110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.1	6.5 -27%	9.34 -83%	5.14 -1%	3.96 22%	7.21 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.04	3.5 -72%	1.32 35%	1.24 39%	1.21 41%	1.1 46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	3 -131%	6.1 -369%	1.48 -14%	1.3 -0%	5.49 -322%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.11 ^104%	2.19 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6501 ^100%	6840 ^95%	6136 ^106%	6741 ^96%	6452 ^101%	7689 ^85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59.5	61.1 3%	64.8 9%		61.4 3%	61 3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93.4	91.4 -2%	98.9 6%		96.3 3%	96 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -11%	-13% / -29%	6% / 7%	7% / 9%	-14% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

The 4K panel here covers just 60 percent of AdobeRGB compared to >90 percent on most other 4K laptops. This shouldn't bother most users except for serious digital artists. Users are at least guaranteed >95 percent sRGB coverage.

The panel comes well-calibrated out of the box with average grayscale and color deltaE values of just 1.3 and 2.1, respectively. End-user calibration will not be necessary.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28 ms rise
57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is better than last year's model due to the brighter backlight to be roughly on par with the MacBook Pro 13 or HP Spectre x360 13. Still, it's not ideal because of the glossy overlay and inevitable glare even if working under shade.

Wide IPS viewing angles. Pictures degrades only minimally if viewing from extreme angles

Performance

Razer has updated the CPU from the 10 W Core i7-1065G7 to the 25 W Core i7-1065G7 and the GPU from the GTX 1650 Max-Q to the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q when compared to the 2019 model. 8 GB RAM options have been dropped in favor of 16 GB LPDDR4X-3733 across the board. Optimus comes standard again with no G-Sync options.

Processor

We were disappointed by the CPU performance of the 10 W Core i7-1065G7 in the 2019 Blade Stealth. It was so slow that even the older Core i7-8565U would handily outperform it. Thankfully, the 25 W Core i7-1065G7 version runs 40 percent faster than last year's 10 W version to be more in line with other Ultrabooks sporting the same Core i7-1065G7 CPU.

Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop shows a performance dip of about 8 percent over time.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-1065G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. It's too bad that Razer offers no hexa-core Core i7-10710U options which would have boosted multi-thread performance by another 40 percent.

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø694 (683.57-745.3)

Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø573 (480.43-760.86)

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø483 (464-551)

Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø520 (491.24-551.03)

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø671 (663.4-722.7)

Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	1051 Points ∼100% +52%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	889 (827.87^min - 893.75^max) Points ∼85% +28%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	797 Points ∼76% +15%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	693 (683.57^min - 745.3^max) Points ∼66%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	676 Points ∼64% -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	672 Points ∼64% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36)	648 Points ∼62% -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	590 (456.98^min - 589.46^max) Points ∼56% -15%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	551 (464^min - 551^max) Points ∼52% -20%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	538 Points ∼51% -22%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	494 Points ∼47% -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	186 Points ∼100% +15%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	180 Points ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35)	174.2 Points ∼94% +8%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	173 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	171 Points ∼92% +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	171 Points ∼92% +6%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	164 Points ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	162 Points ∼87%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	156 Points ∼84% -4%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	149 Points ∼80% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	135 Points ∼73% -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	2410 Points ∼100% +39%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	2107 Points ∼87% +22%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	1737 Points ∼72% 0%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	1729 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31)	1510 Points ∼63% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	1499 Points ∼62% -13%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	1411 Points ∼59% -18%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	1138 Points ∼47% -34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	1087 Points ∼45% -37%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	1021 Points ∼42% -41%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	460 Points ∼100% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	446 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31)	438 Points ∼95% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	427 Points ∼93%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	418 Points ∼91% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	403 Points ∼88% -6%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	388 Points ∼84% -9%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	383 Points ∼83% -10%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	357 Points ∼78% -16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	334 Points ∼73% -22%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	959 Seconds * ∼100%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	938 Seconds * ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23)	882 Seconds * ∼92%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	585 Seconds * ∼61%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	508 Seconds * ∼53%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	4889 MIPS ∼100% +24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	4742 MIPS ∼97% +20%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	4425 MIPS ∼91% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24)	4284 MIPS ∼88% +9%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	4069 MIPS ∼83% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	3948 MIPS ∼81%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	27115 MIPS ∼100% +31%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	24388 MIPS ∼90% +18%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	20699 MIPS ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24)	17024 MIPS ∼63% -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	16346 MIPS ∼60% -21%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	14784 MIPS ∼55% -29%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18)	1274 Points ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	1195 Points ∼94%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	1183 Points ∼93% -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	977 Points ∼77% -18%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	4844 Points ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	4399 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18)	4215 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	2636 Points ∼54% -46%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	7.28 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	6.032 fps ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22)	4.58 fps ∼63%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	3.88 fps ∼53%
HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Intel Core i7-8565U	3.7 fps ∼51%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	63.6 s * ∼100% -2%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7	62.6 s * ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19)	60.3 s * ∼95% +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	56.1 s * ∼88% +10%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18)	0.708 sec * ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	0.646 sec * ∼91%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Intel Core i7-10510U	0.642 sec * ∼91%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6648 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

64.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

693 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

83.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

162 Points

Help

... in comparison

System Performance

PCMark benchmarks are essentially identical to the 2019 Blade Stealth and most other Whiskey Lake-U or Ice Lake Ultrabooks. Common everyday loads like browsing will not feel any faster on the 2020 Blade Stealth despite the huge leap in graphics performance.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5150 Points ∼51% +15%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4609 Points ∼45% +2%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	4497 Points ∼44%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	4484 Points ∼44% 0%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	4451 Points ∼44% -1%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4219 Points ∼42% -6%
Essentials
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	9664 Points ∼74% +10%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	9096 Points ∼70% +4%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8785 Points ∼68% 0%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8764 Points ∼68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	8373 Points ∼65% -4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	8373 Points ∼65% -4%
Productivity
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7245 Points ∼57% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	7182 Points ∼57%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	6912 Points ∼55% -4%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6754 Points ∼54% -6%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	6739 Points ∼53% -6%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	6575 Points ∼52% -8%
Digital Content Creation
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6248 Points ∼31% +59%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	4338 Points ∼22% +11%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	3920 Points ∼20%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	3807 Points ∼19% -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3796 Points ∼19% -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	3704 Points ∼19% -6%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4030 Points ∼61% +18%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	3873 Points ∼58% +13%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3511 Points ∼53% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	3424 Points ∼51%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	3397 Points ∼51% -1%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	3029 Points ∼46% -12%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5173 Points ∼73% +23%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	5065 Points ∼71% +21%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4422 Points ∼62% +5%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	4314 Points ∼61% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	4202 Points ∼59%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512	4099 Points ∼58% -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3424 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4202 points
PCMark 10 Score		4497 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback is otherwise smooth on YouTube with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB	9856 μs * ∼100% -116%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA5-8D512	4572 μs * ∼46%
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	3906 μs * ∼40% +15%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	2841 μs * ∼29% +38%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1521 μs * ∼15% +67%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	1388 μs * ∼14% +70%
Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD	515 μs * ∼5% +89%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The 2020 Blade Stealth is using the newer 512 GB Lite-On CA5-8D512 NVMe SSD compared to last year's Lite-On CA3-8D512. This exact same drive can also be found on the 2020 Blade 15 Base Model. Running DiskSpd Read in a loop 50 times shows no performance throttling issues.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

	Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Lite-On CA5-8D512	Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Lite-On CA3-8D512
AS SSD		-11%	8%	39%	-5%
Seq Read	2220	1821 -18%	1224 -45%	2300 4%	2666 20%
Seq Write	2006	931 -54%	907 -55%	2051 2%	1497 -25%
4K Read	51.4	56.4 10%	41.46 -19%	46.23 -10%	53.7 4%
4K Write	119.2	127.2 7%	126.2 6%	84.6 -29%	133.7 12%
4K-64 Read	740	462.6 -37%	1021 38%	1552 110%	652 -12%
4K-64 Write	968	541 -44%	1251 29%	1789 85%	272 -72%
Access Time Read *	0.051	0.04 22%	0.053 -4%	0.049 4%	0.075 -47%
Access Time Write *	0.1	0.123 -23%	0.027 73%	0.045 55%	0.032 68%
Score Read	1013	701 -31%	1185 17%	1828 80%	972 -4%
Score Write	1288	762 -41%	1468 14%	2079 61%	555 -57%
Score Total	2822	1797 -36%	3250 15%	4831 71%	1982 -30%
Copy ISO MB/s	1881	1068 -43%	1404 -25%		1495 -21%
Copy Program MB/s	441.8	446.4 1%	402.4 -9%		458.4 4%
Copy Game MB/s	505	1163 130%	902 79%		964 91%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-23%	-22%	-11%	-7%
Write 4K	158.7	126.2 -20%	149.2 -6%	163.8 3%	153 -4%
Read 4K	58.2	61.1 5%	47.18 -19%	48.6 -16%	59.5 2%
Write Seq	2219	1049 -53%	750 -66%	2269 2%	1608 -28%
Read Seq	2444	2231 -9%	1137 -53%	1963 -20%	2293 -6%
Write 4K Q32T1	475.9	410.1 -14%	749 57%	289.8 -39%	497 4%
Read 4K Q32T1	509	418.9 -18%	478.7 -6%	373.6 -27%	544 7%
Write Seq Q32T1	2202	784 -64%	1453 -34%	2395 9%	1640 -26%
Read Seq Q32T1	3372	2964 -12%	1713 -49%	3479 3%	3158 -6%
Write 4K Q8T8					960
Read 4K Q8T8					844
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-17% / -16%	-7% / -3%	14% / 18%	-6% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Lite-On CA5-8D512

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3372 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2202 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 509 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 475.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2444 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2219 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 158.7 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is approximately 10 percent slower than the mobile GTX 1060 and only 7 percent faster than the GTX 1650 Max-Q in last year's Blade Stealth according to 3DMark benchmarks. Thus, you're not missing much in terms of GPU power if you already own the 2019 Blade Stealth. Users with the GeForce MX150 or MX250, however, will see significant gains of over 150 percent and have the most to benefit from jumping to the GTX 1650 series.

See our dedicated page on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. The Blade Stealth is the first laptop to ship with this specific GPU.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points ∼100% +150%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	5850 Points ∼76% +89%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5335 Points ∼69% +72%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	4734 Points ∼61% +53%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	3601 Points ∼47% +16%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	3492 Points ∼45% +13%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3478 Points ∼45% +12%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3353 Points ∼43% +8%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7	3098 Points ∼40%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	2896 Points ∼37% -7%
Schenker XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2499 Points ∼32% -19%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H	2130 Points ∼28% -31%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	1147 Points ∼15% -63%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points ∼100% +139%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	15650 Points ∼81% +93%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14753 Points ∼76% +82%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	14463 Points ∼75% +79%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	10715 Points ∼55% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	9930 Points ∼51% +23%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	9195 Points ∼48% +14%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8532 Points ∼44% +5%
Schenker XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8376 Points ∼43% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7	8093 Points ∼42%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	7740 Points ∼40% -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H	6651 Points ∼34% -18%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3726 Points ∼19% -54%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7878 Points ∼100% +147%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	6171 Points ∼78% +93%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5406 Points ∼69% +69%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	4763 Points ∼60% +49%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	3839 Points ∼49% +20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	3774 Points ∼48% +18%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3676 Points ∼47% +15%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3538 Points ∼45% +11%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7	3193 Points ∼41%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	3004 Points ∼38% -6%
Schenker XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2659 Points ∼34% -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H	2258 Points ∼29% -29%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	1280 Points ∼16% -60%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points ∼100% +130%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	21105 Points ∼80% +84%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19329 Points ∼73% +68%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	18234 Points ∼69% +59%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13759 Points ∼52% +20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	12865 Points ∼49% +12%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	12388 Points ∼47% +8%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7	11501 Points ∼44%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	11046 Points ∼42% -4%
Schenker XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	10402 Points ∼39% -10%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H	8903 Points ∼34% -23%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4905 Points ∼19% -57%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points ∼100% +39%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	13533 Points ∼98% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	13027 Points ∼95% +32%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	11707 Points ∼85% +19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	11416 Points ∼83% +16%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7	9874 Points ∼72%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	8855 Points ∼64% -10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8801 Points ∼64% -11%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	8584 Points ∼62% -13%
Schenker XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7792 Points ∼57% -21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H	6864 Points ∼50% -30%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4394 Points ∼32% -55%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 06 Standard Score		30266 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		31116 points
3DMark 11 Performance		11070 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		19073 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7356 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3193 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	247.6 fps ∼100% +55%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	159.5 (147^min - 171^max) fps ∼64%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	137.5 fps ∼56% -14%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	68.8 fps ∼28% -57%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	169.7 fps ∼100% +84%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	92 (85^min - 98^max) fps ∼54%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	84.9 fps ∼50% -8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	38.2 fps ∼23% -58%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	97.5 fps ∼100% +85%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	52.6 (48^min - 58^max) fps ∼54%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	46.3 fps ∼47% -12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	22.6 fps ∼23% -57%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	51.6 fps ∼100% +73%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	29.8 (27^min - 34^max) fps ∼58%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	27.5 fps ∼53% -8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	12.6 fps ∼24% -58%

Frame rates are stable when idling on Witcher 3 for over an hour unlike what we observed on the XPS 15 9500.