AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

► remove AMD 1700

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the slowest model at the time of announcement. With 65 Watt it is also less power hungry than the Ryzen 1700X.

The CPU cores clock from 3 base speed up to 3.75 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 3.7 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.2 GHz. The clock rate and TDP rating is the only difference to the faster Ryzen 7 models.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove AMD PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

► remove AMD 1800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the fastest model at the time of announcement.

The CPU cores clock from 3.6 base speed up to 4.1 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 4 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.7 GHz. Therefore, the CPU offers 200 MHz more than the Ryzen 7 1700X.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7
ZenZenZen
: Ryzen 7 Zen
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X3600 - 4000 MHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X3400 - 3800 MHz8 / 1616 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 17003000 - 3700 MHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3600 - 3900 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3300 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3200 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3500 - 3700 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 1800X3600 - 4000 MHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X3400 - 3800 MHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 17003000 - 3700 MHz8 / 1616 MB
3000 - 3700 MHz2200 - 3800 MHz3600 - 4000 MHz
4 MB2 MB4 MB
16 MB4 MB16 MB
8 / 164 / 88 / 16
65 15 95
4800 4500 4800
14 14 14
AM4AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
$329 U.S.$499 U.S.
384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) PRO 2700U

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
403 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
3677 Points (41%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 1408     avg: 1415     median: 1413.8 (32%)     max: 1424 Points
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430Tooltip
min: 1617     avg: 1628     median: 1619 (37%)     max: 1647 Points
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 144     avg: 146     median: 147 (67%)     max: 147.65 Points
min: 157     avg: 161     median: 162 (74%)     max: 164 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 15.56     avg: 15.7     median: 15.7 (41%)     max: 15.76 Points
18 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 1.63     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (67%)     max: 1.67 Points
1.8 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 4286     avg: 4449     median: 4419 (45%)     max: 4643 Points
5062 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1700 +
min: 28947     avg: 29222     median: 29330 (49%)     max: 29388 Points
32833 Points (55%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
1700 +
120 seconds (1%)
min: 103     avg: 104     median: 103.5 (1%)     max: 104 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
1700 +
6 seconds (1%)
min: 3.8     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (1%)     max: 5.4 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
1700 +
min: 3364     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (40%)     max: 3530 KB/s
min: 3814     avg: 3967     median: 3967 (46%)     max: 4120 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1700 +
min: 67     avg: 74.4     median: 74.4 (47%)     max: 81.8 fps
min: 73     avg: 84     median: 84 (53%)     max: 95 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1700 +
min: 147     avg: 154     median: 153.9 (55%)     max: 160.7 fps
min: 163     avg: 179     median: 179 (64%)     max: 195 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1700 +
min: 0.823     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (44%)     max: 0.83 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1700 +
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1700 +
min: 6     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (37%)     max: 8.4 GB/s
min: 9.6     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (50%)     max: 9.8 GB/s
Blender 2.79 *
290 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1700 +
min: 7730     avg: 8335     median: 8335 (56%)     max: 8940 Points
min: 8462     avg: 9302     median: 9585 (64%)     max: 9858 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1700 +
min: 11.4     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (3%)     max: 12.1 Seconds
12.7 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1700 +
min: 24.9     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (1%)     max: 26.4 Seconds
27.1 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1700 +
min: 594     avg: 636     median: 635.6 (3%)     max: 677.2 Seconds
613 Seconds (3%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
54690 Points (76%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1700 +
min: 10162     avg: 12003     median: 12723 (62%)     max: 13124 points
min: 12983     avg: 13638     median: 13782 (67%)     max: 14150 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1700 +
60924 Points (39%)
min: 68390     avg: 69090     median: 69090 (44%)     max: 69790 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 67876     avg: 68235     median: 68234.5 (81%)     max: 68593 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 66264     avg: 67071     median: 67070.5 (78%)     max: 67877 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1700 +
12048 Points (30%)
min: 13294     avg: 13818     median: 13818 (35%)     max: 14342 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1700 +
min: 16715     avg: 16759     median: 16732 (57%)     max: 16830 Points
min: 18915     avg: 19158     median: 19232 (66%)     max: 19328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1700 +
18461 Points (48%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1700 +
23920 Points (42%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1700 +
3343 Points (69%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1700 +
min: 25002     avg: 25451     median: 25451 (40%)     max: 25900 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1700 +
min: 3609     avg: 3805     median: 3804.5 (77%)     max: 4000 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1700 +
min: 18800     avg: 19292     median: 19292 (54%)     max: 19784 Points
min: 21180     avg: 21595     median: 21594.5 (60%)     max: 22009 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1700 +
min: 4110     avg: 4145     median: 4144.5 (66%)     max: 4179 Points
min: 4481     avg: 4490     median: 4490 (71%)     max: 4499 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1700 +
3884 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1700 +
18457 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
100%
1700 +
1054 ms (2%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1700 +
84.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
100%
1700 +
32176 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 1700 +
141 Watt (38%)
94%
1 1800X +
155 Watt (42%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 1700 +
133 Watt (35%)
88%
1 1800X +
162 Watt (43%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1700 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1800X → 109%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)