Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1047UE vs Intel Celeron 1000M

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

Intel Celeron 1000M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1000M is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

ModelIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 1000M
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1400 MHz1800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGArPGA988B
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$134 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 1000M
Die Size94 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1000M +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1000M +
0.7 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1000M +
2480 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1000M +
6023 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1000M +
3151 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1000M +
1314 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1000M +
41.6 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1000M +
1285 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1000M +
8.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1000M +
47.2 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1000M +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1000M +
1923 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1000M +
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1000M +
47.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1000M +
1076 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1000M +
22230 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1000M +
13410 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1779 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1000M +
13537 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1214 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1648 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1000M +
4938 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1000M +
4298 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1000M +
3016 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1000M +
2848 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1000M +
3405 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1000M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 01:14:54

#0 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3717 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0s ... 0.007s

#20 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.007s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 3717 +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 got single benchmarks 3717 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.025s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#57 return log +0.004s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)