Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i7-1065G7

Intel Core i5-1035G4

► remove Intel 1035G4

The Intel Core i5-1035G4 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.1 (base) - 3.7 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.6 GHz and all four 3.3 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock)  and therefore the CPU performance should be similar to the higher clocked Whiskey-Lake predecessors (e.g. Core i5-8365U with up to 4.1 GHz). 

Compared to the similar called Core i5-1035G7, the G4 variant uses a slower GPU and offers 100 MHz less base clock. Therefore, the CPU speed should be quite similar to the second fastest Ice Lake-U CPU, the Core i5-1035G7.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G4 integrates the smaller G4 variant with 48 of the 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1050 MHz. 

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i5-1035G4 is produced in the new 10nm process at Intel (2nd generation) that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 15 Watts and therefore the CPU can be used in thin and light laptops (but usually with a fan). Intel offers a configurable TDP of 7.5 - 25 Watts for the partners resulting in significant performance differences (due to longer periods of Turbo Boost).

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove Intel 1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock)  and therefore the CPU performance should be similar to the higher clocked Whiskey-Lake predecessors (e.g. Core i5-8665U with up to 4.8 GHz). The Core i7-1065G7 is the fastest 15 W Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019 and only bested from the 28 W Core i7-1068G7.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i7-1065G7 is produced in the new  10nm process at Intel that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 15 Watts and therefore the CPU can be used in thin and light laptops (but usually with a fan). Intel offers a configurable TDP of 7.5 - 25 Watts for the partners resulting in significant performance differences (due to longer periods of Turbo Boost).

Intel Core i5-1035G4Intel Core i7-1065G7
Intel Ice LakeIntel Ice Lake
Ice Lake UIce Lake U
: Ice Lake Ice Lake U
Intel Core i7-1068G7 (compare)2300 - 4100 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-1065G71300 - 3900 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-1035G7 (compare)1200 - 3700 MHz4 / 86 MB
» Intel Core i5-1035G41100 - 3700 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-1035G1 (compare)1000 - 3600 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-1034G1 (compare)800 - 3600 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-1005G1 (compare)1200 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-1068G7 (compare)2300 - 4100 MHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-1065G71300 - 3900 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-1035G7 (compare)1200 - 3700 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-1035G41100 - 3700 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-1035G1 (compare)1000 - 3600 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-1034G1 (compare)800 - 3600 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-1005G1 (compare)1200 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
1100 - 3700 MHz1300 - 3900 MHz
192 KB192 KB
2 MB2 MB
6 MB8 MB
4 / 84 / 8
15 15
10 10
AVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0AVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)
Intel Ice Lake 1035G4

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
441 Points (86%)
min: 377     avg: 434     median: 452 (88%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
1410 Points (16%)
min: 1189     avg: 1592     median: 1590 (18%)     max: 2024 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 538     avg: 591     median: 591 (14%)     max: 644 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
min: 521     avg: 686     median: 705.5 (16%)     max: 830 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points (79%)
min: 149     avg: 177     median: 179 (82%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
7.4 Points (19%)
min: 5.69     avg: 7.7     median: 8.1 (21%)     max: 9.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
2 Points (83%)
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (87%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
6829 Points (70%)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (75%)     max: 7390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22252 Points (37%)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (38%)     max: 26481 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
308 seconds (4%)
min: 232.895     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.368 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
7.4 seconds (1%)
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 seconds
WinRAR - Result
4526 KB/s (53%)
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (58%)     max: 4995 KB/s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
11030 MIPS (12%)
min: 15460     avg: 19315     median: 19450.5 (21%)     max: 22898 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
1307 MIPS (9%)
min: 4231     avg: 4377     median: 4421.5 (29%)     max: 4434 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
35.8 fps (23%)
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (29%)     max: 49.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
154 fps (55%)
min: 175.5     avg: 185     median: 184.9 (66%)     max: 194.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
5.1 fps (18%)
min: 3.92     avg: 5.2     median: 5.3 (19%)     max: 6.38 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (23%)
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (24%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.8 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
4.7 GB/s (24%)
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (26%)     max: 5 GB/s
Blender 2.79 *
900 Seconds (10%)
min: 679     avg: 783     median: 735.5 (8%)     max: 981 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
7976 Points (53%)
9295 Points (62%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 Seconds (2%)
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.715 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.4 Seconds (1%)
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.417 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
458 Seconds (2%)
min: 430.968     avg: 481     median: 480.9 (2%)     max: 530.738 Seconds
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
8319 points (41%)
min: 6475     avg: 8456     median: 9009.5 (44%)     max: 10494 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 43291     avg: 49935     median: 52089.5 (33%)     max: 54876 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 36324     avg: 48606     median: 50157 (60%)     max: 54424 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 52974     avg: 56646     median: 57573.5 (67%)     max: 58858 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 5372     avg: 7056     median: 7393 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
9174 Points (31%)
min: 8119     avg: 10455     median: 11097 (38%)     max: 12021 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
3863 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
60853 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
18772 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
5752 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 5239     avg: 5381     median: 5381 (85%)     max: 5523 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 14557     avg: 16542     median: 16542 (29%)     max: 18527 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 1184     avg: 1256     median: 1256 (93%)     max: 1328 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 3375     avg: 4056     median: 4055.5 (25%)     max: 4736 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
1035 ms (2%)
min: 950.5     avg: 1013     median: 1002.5 (2%)     max: 1114.3 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
35435 Points (68%)
min: 25166     avg: 34560     median: 36044 (69%)     max: 38416 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 1035G4 +
26.8 Watt (7%)
94%
1 1065G7 +
48.3 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 1035G4 +
41.6 Watt (11%)
98%
1 1065G7 +
48.9 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G4 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 112%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)