Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1020M vs Intel Celeron 1047UE

Intel Celeron 1020M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1020M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 2.1 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1020M should be similar fast as a Pentium B960. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

ModelIntel Celeron 1020MIntel Celeron 1047UE
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock2100 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketrPGA988BBGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$134 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1020MIntel Celeron 1047UE

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 07. 08:17:44

#0 checking url part for id 3718 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3718 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#20 got single benchmarks 3718 +0s ... 0.009s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#22 got single benchmarks 3596 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 return log +0.004s ... 0.016s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)