Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1020E vs Intel Celeron 1007U

Intel Celeron 1020E

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1020E is an entry level dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Compared to previous generations, the 1020E should be similar fast as a Pentium B980.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1000 MHz with Turbo Boost. Only some older and less demanding games can be played fluently in low settings.

Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1007U

► remove from comparison Intel 1007U

The Intel Celeron 1007U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.5 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1007U should be similar fast as a Celeron B820.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1007U is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 1020EIntel Celeron 1007U
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
» Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock2200 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGAFCBGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1020EIntel Celeron 1007U
Die Size94 mm2
$86 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1007U +
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1007U +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1007U +
4962 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1007U +
2480 Points (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1007U +
1610 Points (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1007U +
3440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1007U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 09:50:24

#0 checking url part for id 3598 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3720 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3598 +0s ... 0.01s

#20 got single benchmarks 3598 +0s ... 0.01s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 3720 +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 got single benchmarks 3720 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#33 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.02s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#35 return log +0.004s ... 0.024s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)