Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1017U vs Intel Celeron 1047UE vs Intel Celeron 927UE

Intel Celeron 1017U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1017U is an entry-level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set compared to the faster Core processors. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are all disabled.

Compared to previous generations, the 1017U is similar to a Celeron B820 in terms of performance.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1017U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

Intel Celeron 927UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 927UE is an ultra low voltage single core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 927UE should be similar fast as a 2.13 GHz Celeron M 560.

ModelIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 927UE
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Clock1600 MHz1400 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 21 / 1
TDP17 Watt17 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1023BGABGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$134 U.S.$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1017U +
1.3 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1017U +
0.6 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1017U +
2201 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1017U +
4155 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1017U +
5280 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1017U +
2797 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1017U +
1449 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1017U +
46.4 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1017U +
1150 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1017U +
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1017U +
41.9 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1017U +
1719 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1017U +
24.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1017U +
53.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1017U +
1219 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1017U +
19720 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1017U +
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1017U +
4130 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1017U +
1532 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1017U +
11797 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1017U +
1041 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 1017U +
2308 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 1017U +
1367 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1017U +
3985 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1017U +
3500 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1017U +
2631 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1017U +
2494 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1017U +
2892 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1017U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 02:20:46

#0 checking url part for id 3947 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3594 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3947 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 3947 +0.013s ... 0.041s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.045s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3594 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#12 got single benchmarks 3594 +0s ... 0.048s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.101s ... 0.15s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.15s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)