Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Celeron 1037U

Intel Celeron 1000M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1000M is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 1000MIntel Celeron 1037U
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1800 MHz1800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm294 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketrPGA988BFCBGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1000MIntel Celeron 1037U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.7 Points (2%)
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2480 Points (22%)
2500 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4757 Points (6%)
4824 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6023 Points (5%)
6107 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3151 Points (19%)
3165 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1314 s (16%)
1304 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
41.6 s (8%)
41.5 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1285 Points (7%)
1276 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.5 fps (4%)
8.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
47.2 fps (13%)
46.8 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1923 Points (4%)
1903 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.3 s (5%)
21.5 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.1 s (2%)
47.2 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1076 s (5%)
1091 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22230 MIPS (11%)
22380 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13410 MFLOPS (10%)
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 1037U +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4757 Points (5%)
4744 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1779 Points (6%)
1880 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13537 Points (9%)
13626 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1214 Points (3%)
1225 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1648 Points (4%)
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4938 Points (40%)
4937 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4298 Points (39%)
4278 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3016 Points (6%)
3032 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2848 Points (6%)
2850 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3405 Points (9%)
3408 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1000M → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → 100% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 02. 07:54:38

#0 checking url part for id 3717 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3719 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3717 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 got single benchmarks 3717 +0.01s ... 0.02s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 3719 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#25 got single benchmarks 3719 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.029s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.045s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.052s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#87 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.055s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#89 return log +0.003s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)