ZTE Blade V2020 smartphone in review: With IPS panel and plastic case
After having reviewed the Axon 11 and the Blade V10 Vita ZTE devices, we can definitely make a purchase recommendation for the devices from the Chinese manufacturer. Of course, there were points of criticism too, although these are by all means bearable considering the asking price. In the following review, we will clarify whether the ZTE Blade V2020 repeats similar mistakes and whether it can also differentiate itself.
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.6 % | 11/2020 | ZTE Blade V2020 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 185 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
81.8 % | 10/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
74 % | 09/2020 | LG K61 Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 191 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
77.9 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Play SD 662, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
Case - Robust plastic
ZTE equips the Blade V2020 with a plastic case. The frame of the latter is surrounded by a wide groove that allows the smartphone to be held firmly in the hand. The available colors are Aurora Black and Dazzling White. At a weight of 185 grams, it's also the lightest phone in our test field. In addition, the Blade V2020 is slightly shorter than comparable competing products.
Connectivity - No Widevine L1 in the Blade V2020
The ZTE Blade V2020 packs hardware that belonged to the mid-range in early 2019. However, in combination with the built-in 4 GB of RAM, most everyday applications should run without issues. In addition, there's 128 GB of internal storage that can be expanded by up to 512 GB via a microSD card, according to the manufacturer. However, this blocks the second nano SIM slot.
Both SIM slots can also handle VoLTE and VoWLAN. Furthermore, there's a 3.5 mm audio jack as well as a very small and somewhat dim notification LED. DRM Widevine L1 isn't available, and the Camera2 API only provides the "Limited" support level.
Software - Android with MiFavor UI
The Blade V2020 runs Android 10 with security patches at the level of September 5, 2020; the smartphone comes with MiFavor UI 10 as its user interface. This is similar to pure Android and can be used quickly and intuitively even by beginners. Any preinstalled third-party apps, such as Asphalt Nitro, CleanMaster, and WPS Office, can be uninstalled easily. On the other hand, the manufacturer's applications, such as ZTE Cares, can only be deactivated.
Communication and GPS - Moderate WLAN performance
With the Blade V2020, users can use GSM, 3G, and LTE networks. In terms of the latter, LTE Cat. 7 enables download speeds of up to 300 Mb/s and upload rates of up to 100 Mb/s. NFC, Bluetooth 4.1, and Wi-Fi 5 are available in close ranges. With our Netgear Nighthawk A12 reference router, ZTE's smartphone achieves average WLAN speeds of 335 Mb/s for receiving data and 329 Mb/s for sending data.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
LG K61 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
LG K61 |
To determine its own location, the ZTE Blade V2020 can make use of GPS and GLONASS. With the GPS Test app, we can achieve an accuracy of up to four meters outdoors.
During our requisite bike ride, the Android smartphone showed a slightly greater deviation from our reference device, the Garmin Edge 500, both in curves and on long, straights roads.
Telephone and call quality - Clear transmission
The ZTE Blade V2020 offers a fairly high volume during conversations, with participants on both sides being easily understood. The telephone app offers a direct view of stored favorites and allows the display of a numeric keypad. Two additional tabs allow access to the call history and stored contacts.
Cameras - Suitable zoom, pale colors
The main camera of the Blade V2020 features a 48 MP main sensor, 8 MP for wide-angle shots, 2 MP for macro subjects, and another 2 MP for depth information. The camera can capture our test subject with many details and sharply defined objects in the focus area. Colors look a little pale, which is reflected again in our panorama shot. Subjects photographed with the wide-angle lens appear somewhat blurred, and smooth surfaces look soft. If the zoom is used, many details are lost, and the image comes out overexposed. Our test subject is just about recognizable in low light.
The 16 MP front-facing camera successfully produces portraits with much stronger colors. Details can be easily recognized, and object edges are sharply captured. Image quality can be modified by applying color filters and beautifying options. In addition, a manual mode is available for the main camera, offering a timer function and the possibility to adjust the ISO value, the brightness, and the white balance.
Video recordings achieve a similar quality to that of our sample photographs. The camera can quickly adjust to different lighting conditions, and the optional image stabilizer ensures videos without shakiness. Possible resolutions are 1080p and 720p. A high frame-rate mode or the like is not offered.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Close-upPanoramaWide-angleZoom (5x)Low lightThe photo of the ColorChecker Passport shows that the camera of the ZTE smartphone captures colors brighter than they should be. The text chart looks sharp, but it's also a bit too bright. In addition, there's a weakness in contrast at the lower corners.
Accessories and warranty - Protective case and headset in the box
The box includes a USB power adapter with a matching USB Type-C cable, a protective silicone case, a 3.5 mm stereo headset, and a tool for removing SIM cards. In addition, the manufacturer grants buyers a warranty period of 24 months.
Input devices and handling - Responsive touchscreen
ZTE uses Google's GBoard for text input. The touchscreen responds very well to touch and is also suitable for wide swiping gestures. The fingerprint scanner on the back unlocks the smartphone reliably, and face recognition also worked very well in our test.
Display - ZTE smartphone with IPS panel
The screen of the Blade V2020 consists of a 6.53-inch IPS panel and offers a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. At an average brightness of 474 cd/m², it sits in the lower half of our test field. In the APL50 test, a slightly better 482 cd/m² is achieved, and we measure a maximum of 466 cd/m² with the sensor activated. The lowest possible luminosity is 12.09 cd/m².
We also notice very high-frequency flickering at brightness levels below 23%. At a value of 63,290 Hz, this should only cause problems for users with very sensitive eyes.
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 465 cd/m²
Contrast: 1788:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
ZTE Blade V2020 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | LG K61 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53 | Motorola Moto G9 Play IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 10% | -21% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 465 | 623 34% | 505 9% | 450 -3% |
Brightness | 474 | 600 27% | 511 8% | 428 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 95 3% | 88 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.54 -108% | 0.56 -115% | 0.23 12% |
Contrast | 1788 | 1154 -35% | 902 -50% | 1957 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 1.8 66% | 5.76 -9% | 5.49 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.9 | 4.7 53% | 12.04 -22% | 10.19 -3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 3.3 40% | 4.9 11% | 7.5 -36% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.244 98% | 2.495 88% |
CCT | 7659 85% | 6712 97% | 7807 83% | 8711 75% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 63290 Hz | ≤ 23 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 63290 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 23 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 63290 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
With a very good contrast ratio of 1,788:1 and an equally good black level of 0.26 cd/m², the ZTE Blade V2020 takes second place in our test field. However, colors are shown on the display with a slightly increased blue proportion. Users can balance out this condition by manually adjusting color reproduction in the settings, though.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Outdoors, the Blade V2020 can be used well, especially in places in the shade. In direct sunlight or in very bright environments, however, bothersome reflections and glare can occur.
The IPS panel of the ZTE Blade V2020 is very viewing-angle stable, allowing content to be read without distorted colors or the like even from very steep angles.
Performance - Powerful and suitable for everyday use
The MediaTek Helio P70 installed here belonged to the upper mid-range when it was released in April 2019. In combination with the 4 GB of RAM used here, performance is still sufficient for most common apps today as well. In the benchmarks, the ZTE Blade V2020 shows a performance level on par with the installed hardware. The results are usually surpassed by the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and are comparable to the performance of the Motorola Moto G9 Play.
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
LG K61 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (282 - 320, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
LG K61 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1184 - 1475, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Vulkan Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1308 - 1410, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 15910, n=90, last 2 years) | |
OpenCL Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1254 - 1353, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (434 - 13654, n=82, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
LG K61 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (7160 - 11781, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
LG K61 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (5992 - 8365, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (29 - 46, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (34 - 43, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (16 - 35, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (18 - 23, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (10 - 25, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6.9 - 14, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (167477 - 183710, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1959 - 2285, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years) | |
System (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (3722 - 4849, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Memory (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1856 - 2909, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Graphics (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1712 - 1805, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Web (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1045 - 1244, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years) |
In the browser benchmarks, the V2020 achieves averagely good values, but it can only take second place in our test field in the Octane V2 test. Moreover, a smooth browsing experience is possible, and websites are loaded quickly in everyday life.
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 (Chrome 86) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (34.3 - 50.2, n=7) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (35 - 55, n=8) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 (Chrome 86) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
ZTE Blade V2020 (Chrome 86) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6269 - 9863, n=8) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
ZTE Blade V2020 (Chrome 86) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (4198 - 5659, n=8) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The internal storage of the ZTE smartphone has a capacity of 128 GB. Speed is on par with other eMMC storage devices, but it doesn't come close to the performance of smartphones with UFS storage.
The internal card reader, on the other hand, reaches values at the level of the competition with our reference memory card, the Toshiba Exceria Pro M401.
ZTE Blade V2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | LG K61 | Motorola Moto G9 Play | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 96% | -13% | 71% | 27% | 557% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 308.7 | 506 64% | 273.4 -11% | 315.2 2% | 283 ? -8% | 1471 ? 377% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 256.9 | 173.1 -33% | 224.1 -13% | 187.2 -27% | 192.9 ? -25% | 1084 ? 322% |
Random Read 4KB | 72.5 | 123.4 70% | 58.3 -20% | 98.4 36% | 82.6 ? 14% | 243 ? 235% |
Random Write 4KB | 19.16 | 112.6 488% | 13.7 -28% | 96.1 402% | 53.9 ? 181% | 267 ? 1294% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.1 ? | 75.2 ? -5% | 79.8 ? 1% | 85.4 ? 8% | 78.1 ? -1% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.8 ? | 55.6 ? -10% | 58.6 ? -5% | 65.3 ? 6% | 61.8 ? 0% |
Games - Gaming is possible without issues
An ARM Mali-G72 MP3 takes care of displaying image content in the ZTE Blade V2020. This graphics unit is sufficient enough to run modern games smoothly at medium to high settings. The titles that we tested ran smoothly and could be controlled without problems via the touchscreen.
Emissions - Barely heats up and has a loud speaker
Temperature
In our test, the ZTE Blade V2020 heats up to 30.2 °C (~86 °F) under load. As a result, it only feels slightly warm and can be used without restrictions at all times.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Speaker
The Blade V2020 offers relatively high volume and a sound spectrum with pronounced high tones. This makes it well suited for the reproduction of voice content, for example. However, for more complex media content, such as music, users should upgrade to external speakers or headphones.
ZTE Blade V2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life - Very good endurance
Energy consumption
The ZTE smartphone has a slightly higher power consumption under load than comparably equipped devices. In idle usage or under low system load, however, it's more energy efficient. The included power adapter offers an output of 18 watts and has, therefore, enough capacity to ensure a reliable power supply.
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.29 Watt |
Idle | 0.64 / 1.54 / 1.65 Watt |
Load |
4.73 / 7.5 Watt |
ZTE Blade V2020 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P70 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -6% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.93 -45% | 0.801 ? -25% | 0.896 ? -40% |
Idle Average * | 1.54 | 2.47 -60% | 1.739 ? -13% | 1.449 ? 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.65 | 2.51 -52% | 2.06 ? -25% | 1.629 ? 1% |
Load Average * | 4.73 | 5.62 -19% | 3.59 ? 24% | 5.51 ? -16% |
Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 6.93 8% | 6.65 ? 11% | 8.19 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery life
In our practical WLAN test, the ZTE Blade V2020 reaches a runtime of 17:22 hours. Therefore, it can make very good use of its 4,000-mAh battery. With the included fast charger, the smartphone is fully recharged again after about one-and-a-half hours.
ZTE Blade V2020 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | LG K61 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G9 Play 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 1042 | 1116 7% | 842 -19% | 962 -8% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Inexpensive and suitable for everyday life
The ZTE Blade V2020 shows no significant weaknesses in our test. The system performance is good, workmanship leaves nothing to be desired, and the large display provides a good image. Thanks to the large internal storage, users don't have to expect storage space problems too quickly and can use the hybrid slot for a second nano SIM instead of a memory card without giving it a second thought. The Blade V2020 can hardly be reproached for something considering its price.
With the ZTE Blade V2020, price and performance are right.
When it comes to the details, however, there are still things that can be criticized. Especially the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC sets the bar very high here and delivers significantly more, for example, in terms of WLAN and performance for a similar price. But if one disregards this particular competitor, the ZTE Blade V2020 has earned itself a very good position in the field of low-cost smartphones.
ZTE Blade V2020
-
11/10/2020 v7
Mike Wobker