Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi is set to launch the Redmi Note 10s in various markets soon

The Redmi Note 10s. (Source: Xiaomi)
The Redmi Note 10s. (Source: Xiaomi)
The Redmi Note 10s' imminent global debut has effectively been confirmed through a new certification issued by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG). The new document registers the phone by name, and also specifies multiple variants that might be destined for different regions. They may include India and the EU.

Xiaomi has already announced the Redmi Note 10s, although its availability is thin on the ground at present. However, it seems it will soon launch in a number of markets. This new leak comes courtesy of the Bluetooth SIG, and provides fairly concrete evidence that it will launch soon.

In fact, it seems the Note 10s has a number of variants: M2101K7BI, M2101K7BG, M2101K7BNY and M2101K7BL. They may denote market specificity rather than different RAM/storage configurations: for example, the first of them as listed is now thought to be destined for India.

The Note 10s might also be headed to Europe soon. However, this new phone will land there with an SoC that is far from novel. The phone runs on the 4G/LTE-only MediaTek Helio G95, which has been around for some time now.

Then again, this detail might keep the Redmi Note 10s' starting cost nice and low at its putative new launch events. Similarly, it makes do with an increasingly repetitive 64+8+2+2MP rear camera array, especially next to its 108MP main sensor siblings.

Pick a Redmi Note 10 up from Amazon

Xiaomi registers a number of Redmi Note 10s variants. (Source: Bluetooth SIG via MySmartPrice)
Xiaomi registers a number of Redmi Note 10s variants. (Source: Bluetooth SIG via MySmartPrice)
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2021 04 > Xiaomi is set to launch the Redmi Note 10s in various markets soon
Deirdre O'Donnell, 2021-04- 9 (Update: 2021-04- 9)