Notebookcheck Logo

Telekom T Phone Pro smartphone review - Happily big

Like a Pro? Telekom have introduced their own range of T Phone smartphones - there is even a Pro model. The phones feature a quad camera, large display, NFC and an audio jack. On top of this, software updates are available for a long time. In this review, you can find out whether the T Phone Pro is a Pro model for everyone.
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Telekom's T Phone Pro is the result of the mobile carrier and Google working together - at least as far as the software is concerned. Besides the Pro model, there is also a "normal" T Phone. The Pro model is only available with 128 GB of storage and 6 GB of RAM.

Telekom T Phone Pro (T Phone Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.82 inch 20.5:9, 1640 x 720 pixel 263 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), LTE (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), 5G Sub6 FDD: N1 (2100), N3 (1800), N7 (2600), N28 (700), 5G Sub6 TDD: N38 (2600), N78 (3500), LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 173.9 x 77.4 ( = 0.35 x 6.85 x 3.05 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Hynix-Hi-5021 + 5 MPix Ultrawide + 2 MPix Macro + 2 MPix depth of field
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 1, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM eject tool, 24 Months Warranty, Camera2 API: Level 3, IP52, SAR-Head 0.84 W/kg, SAR-Body 1.36 W/kg, fanless
Weight
215 g ( = 7.58 oz / 0.47 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
269 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.2 %
04/2023
Telekom T Phone Pro
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		215 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.82"1640x720
83.2 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4		186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.5 %
07/2022
Honor X8
SD 680, Adreno 610		177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2388x1080
80.8 %
07/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
81.9 %
08/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - The T Phone Pro is made of aluminum and plastic

The T Phone Pro is a large smartphone. Its 6.8-inch display is surrounded by expansive display edges. The back is made of plastic, the frame of aluminum. The phone's construction is stable and can barely be bent. Its display is protected by an unspecified type of glass. A magenta-colored power button and a volume rocker are located on the right side of the phone.

The device is only available in the color "dark shadow" - a dark, matte gray. Despite its matte color, quite a few fingerprint marks are left behind. Its camera unit barely protrudes from the device, and it doesn't wobble if you type while the phone is placed on the table. The included extra-long SIM eject tool is necessary to open the SIM card slot. The device is protected according to IP52.

Size comparison

❌
173.9 mm / 6.85 inch 77.4 mm / 3.05 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 215 g0.474 lbs164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs164.19 mm / 6.46 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 8.12 mm / 0.3197 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs163.4 mm / 6.43 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 7.45 mm / 0.2933 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs159.7 mm / 6.29 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 186 g0.4101 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Pro model with wireless charging

The phone's processor is a Mediatek Dimensity 700 and it is supported by a Mali-G57 MP2 GPU. A few great features are that Telekom have decided to install a microSD reader as well as NFC, an audio jack, and wireless Qi charging. However, users sadly have to do without Wi-Fi6 or dual-SIM. However, the smartphone is 5G-capable.

microSD card reader

The T Phone Pro's memory can be expanded by inserting microSD cards. Cards with a capacity of up to 2 TB are supported. However, its transfer rates were mediocre in our test using an AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference card. Although the T Phone Pro clearly beat the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, the Samsung A33 was able to transfer data three times as fast.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s +234%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.72 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.13 MB/s -32%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.5 (26.1-50.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.6 (24.4-44)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø67.8 (35.5-78.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.2 (34.6-89.2)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)

Software - Telekom have used Vanilla Android

The T Phone Pro runs Vanilla Android in its purest form - no bloatware is installed, which is great. Only the typical Google apps can be found. This means its system is nice and slim, and 117 GB are available for free use. 

In our test, the smartphone still ran Android 12, and the security patch was from the current month. Telekom promise four years of security updates. These are supposedly delivered monthly for the first three years, and quarterly in the fourth year.

There is still no native one-handed mode in Android 12, which is a shame considering it's such a large smartphone. However, the manufacturer has promised to deliver Android 13 "soon", which apparently will also introduce a one-handed mode.

Communication and GNSS - Stable transmission on the T Phone Pro

The T Phone Pro didn't show any abnormalities in the network measurements using our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. The connection was stable, and the transfer rates were average for its class.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s +76%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
370 (362min - 371max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (334min - 353max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s -7%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247 (47min - 312max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s +84%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
373 (364min - 385max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 (180min - 373max) MBit/s -5%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (108min - 372max) MBit/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s -28%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (362-371)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø373 (364-385)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)
GNSS outdoor measurement
GNSS outdoor measurement
GNSS indoor measurement
GNSS indoor measurement

Its satellite connection did not cause any problems in our test. It takes a bit of time to establish a connection from inside buildings, but it is stable and accurate.

The T Phone Pro's route navigation also worked well on a bike trip. In practice, the device didn't show any problems when navigating with Google Maps, for example. The T Phone Pro supports GPS, Glonass and Galileo, but only with one band (L1/L1/E1).

GNSS test trip: lake round trip
GNSS test trip: lake round trip
GNSS test trip: turning point
GNSS test trip: turning point
GNSS test trip: summary
GNSS test trip: summary

Phone functions and voice quality - More could be possible

Even though this is a Telekom smartphone, the device works smoothly with SIM cards from other providers. The voice quality is okay, however, the smartphone could filter out noise better. In addition, you can sometimes hear a slight echo from time to time when you are on a call using the phone.

The smartphone supports the most common frequency bands in Europe, and there were no reception problems in our test. VoLTE and WLAN calls are also supported.

Cameras - Only the main camera is any good on the T Phone Pro

Selfie using the T Phone Pro
Selfie using the T Phone Pro

Telekom advertise the T Phone Pro as having a quad-camera system. However, only the pictures from the 50-megapixel main camera were really usable - and even so, only if there was sufficient light. Compared to the small T Phone, the Pro has an additional ultra-wide-angle lens. However, it only has a resolution of 5 MPix, and pictures were correspondingly poor in detail.

A slightly different color balance could also be noticed in comparison with the small T Phone, and deviations on the test chart were larger.

The camera's pictures were barely usable in low light. Its software tried to brighten the pictures, but this mainly resulted in image noise. The 16 MPix front-facing camera is just as mediocre. It features a higher resolution than that of the T Phone, but was still not convincing. It lacked details, and the peripheral areas were also a little too brightened.

Videos can be recorded using the main camera with a maximum resolution of 2K, but then only at 30 fps. At 1080p, 60 fps is also possible. The front-facing camera records at a maximum of 1,080p and 30 fps.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HaseSeeUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
13.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Telekom T Phone Pro: 9.06 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 19.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.7 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Telekom T Phone Pro: 47.15 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.93 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Telekom are thrifty

The T Phone Pro's scope of delivery is unspectacular. Telekom include a SIM card tool, a quick guide, and a USB cable (A to C) with the smartphone. A power adapter or a case has to be purchased separately. A screen protector is not installed.

Input devices & operation - No problem unlocking the T Phone Pro

The T Phone Pro's touchscreen was inconspicuous in our test and did not produce any errors. One-handed operation would come in handy due to the device's size, which will supposedly be introduced with Android 13. The T Phone Pro uses the GBoard keyboard ex-works.

The smartphone is unlocked via a fingerprint scanner located in the power button or via 2D facial recognition. Both unlocking methods work reliably - but the camera needs enough light to recognize your face. However, the smartphone also asks for the PIN or password several times a day.

Display - Nice and big, but unfortunately quite dim

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The 6.82-inch IPS display is a real highlight of the T Phone Pro - at least indoors. Its resolution is okay, and the panel also has a nice level of contrast. The display's biggest weakness is definitely its low maximum brightness. Except for the Honor X80, all of its competitors showed better brightness levels, at times significantly.

Furthermore, the display only supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz, whereas some competitors in this price range offer 90 or 120 Hz. On a positive note, we could not measure PWM.

386
cd/m²		413
cd/m²		378
cd/m²
381
cd/m²		436
cd/m²		371
cd/m²
375
cd/m²		419
cd/m²		371
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 436 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 436 cd/m²
Contrast: 1557:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Telekom T Phone Pro
IPS, 1640x720, 6.82		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40		Honor X8
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.70		OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
62%
-12%
5%
59%
Brightness middle
436
693
59%
510
17%
590
35%
675
55%
Brightness
392
695
77%
469
20%
561
43%
686
75%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
78
-8%
92
8%
95
12%
Black Level *
0.28
0.82
-193%
0.38
-36%
Contrast
1557
622
-60%
1553
0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.2
1.3
75%
2.5
52%
5.15
1%
1.3
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.5
3.5
63%
5.8
39%
10.35
-9%
3.9
59%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7
1.3
81%
4.1
41%
7.1
-1%
1.7
76%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.14 103%
2.45 90%
2.143 103%
2.16 102%
CCT
8585 76%
6530 100%
6307 103%
8540 76%
6591 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The T Phone Pro primarily owes its good contrast rates to a very low black value. Its DeltaE deviations were overall considerable, especially in the grayscale.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
41.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.63 ms rise
↘ 22.12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
66.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.32 ms rise
↘ 37.31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

The IPS panel's viewing angle stability is okay - at least indoors. Outdoors, readability is primarily impeded by the phone's low maximum brightness. The screen is hardly legible when viewed from the side.

 

Performance - The T Phone Pro is sufficient for everyday use

The T Phone Pro will likely not win any trophies for its performance. Yet, the Dimensity 700 is not badly handled by Deutsche Telekom; the SoC is simply not that fast. In the test field, the T Phone Pro lost out to devices with Snapdragon 695 in all benchmarks.

This performance is sufficient enough to play current games such as PUBG Mobile. However, you can only select HD resolution and stutters do sometimes occur. The phone's performance is currently sufficient for everyday tasks, but the "Pro" in the title certainly got our hopes up a little.

Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +93%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (664 - 692, n=3)
680 Points +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
664 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +94%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1756 - 1826, n=3)
1802 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1756 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +121%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
399726 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
398969 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398622 Points +19%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
334015 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (243323 - 356312, n=5)
305947 Points -8%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10396 Points +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=11)
8048 Points +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
7854 Points
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7645 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
593 Points +14%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
520 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (371 - 534, n=5)
496 Points -5%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
413 Points -21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3638 Points +31%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3596 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3477 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2779 - 3107, n=8)
2926 Points +5%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2779 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +98%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7976 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7836 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7184 Points +47%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4888 - 6712, n=8)
5669 Points +16%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4888 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4311 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4183 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3685 - 4473, n=8)
4100 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3829 Points +4%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3685 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +447%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5104 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4426 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4323 Points +66%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2599 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2676, n=8)
2572 Points -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +17%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1274 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1083 - 1353, n=8)
1237 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1207 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1125 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1041 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +136%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9243 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9167 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4863 - 9243, n=5)
6899 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4126 Points -55%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +1722%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
979 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (949 - 979, n=2)
964 Points -2%

The phone's GPU performance matched the CPU's impression. The T Phone Pro always came in last in the comparison field in demanding benchmarks. Samsung's Galaxy A33 with the Mali-G68 MP4 was in a league of its own.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
617 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points +10%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
318 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points +11%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2238 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1166 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
442 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2262 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1175 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2824 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2822 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2594 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2721 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2710 Points +18%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2296 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3514 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2734 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2711 Points +13%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2396 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3613 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points +1%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3532 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points -14%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2571 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3922 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points +28%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2973 Points +28%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2329 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1186 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3107 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points +22%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2520 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1347 Points -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +52%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +47%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
62 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +5%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -25%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +24%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
45 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -33%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +162%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +162%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +27%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -29%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -29%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.6 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +37%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps +35%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.2 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -27%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -37%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.4 fps +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +80%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +80%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -30%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
66.011 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
64.223 Points +22%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64.165 Points +22%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
52.47 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8)
45.6 Points -13%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
47.99 runs/min
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
47.11 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
38.7 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6)
37.4 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
65 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64 Points +8%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
59 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4)
54.3 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
100 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
96 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
82 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4)
56.8 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
24521 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
22285 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
21269 Points +23%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
17266 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9)
17130 Points -1%
Honor X8 (Chrome 103)
13141 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8)
2693 ms * -15%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
2349 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
2013.3 ms * +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1922.7 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
1856.6 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Telekom T Phone ProSamsung Galaxy A33 5GHonor X8OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
7%
14%
-7%
5%
-37%
84%
Sequential Read 256KB
948
512.84
-46%
926.58
-2%
509.21
-46%
523
-45%
530 ?(286 - 948, n=36)
-44%
1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years)
59%
Sequential Write 256KB
455
487.66
7%
510.25
12%
482.15
6%
488.91
7%
215 ?(142.8 - 466, n=36)
-53%
1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years)
146%
Random Read 4KB
141
216.48
54%
189.38
34%
179.02
27%
204.3
45%
129.6 ?(65 - 233, n=36)
-8%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years)
75%
Random Write 4KB
173
194.12
12%
195.75
13%
147.46
-15%
196.38
14%
100.7 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=36)
-42%
272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years)
57%

Emissions - The T Phone Pro stays cool

Temperature

The T Phone Pro is no performance beast, but it always managed to stay pleasantly cool. Even under full load, such as during benchmarks, its temperature didn't get higher than lukewarm.

Max. Load
 31.8 °C
89 F		30.7 °C
87 F		32.4 °C
90 F		 
 31.9 °C
89 F		30.8 °C
87 F		32.5 °C
91 F		 
 31.1 °C
88 F		31.2 °C
88 F		29.8 °C
86 F		 
Maximum: 32.5 °C = 91 F
Average: 31.4 °C = 89 F
29.4 °C
85 F		30.7 °C
87 F		31.3 °C
88 F
29 °C
84 F		30.2 °C
86 F		31.5 °C
89 F
28.9 °C
84 F		29 °C
84 F		29.9 °C
86 F
Maximum: 31.5 °C = 89 F
Average: 30 °C = 86 F
Room Temperature 20.9 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.2 %
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.2 %
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.9 % -1%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.954 (1.947-1.963)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.77 (3.76-3.79)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.753 (0.745-0.76)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.68)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.01 (7.01-7.06)

Speakers

Telekom have installed a mono speaker on the bottom of the T Phone Pro. It sounds good enough with a linear output - especially in the mids and trebles. However, there is no bass to be heard.

Its volume control is also surprising. Sounds are only audible in normal surroundings when the volume bar is at about 50%. Nevertheless, the speaker can get loud when needed, but the volume adjustment levels only come in big steps - not much nuance here. 

It is great that Telekom chose to install an audio jack, and the output is low-noise (SNR 79.36). The T Phone Pro also supports common Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD and LDAC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202933.32525.332.23125.738.84026.738.35029.338.86321.136.18017.839.41001739.212513.142.816012.644.620011.750.125011.156.73151260.440010.962.150011.969.163010.469.38009.773.1100010.776.7125011.974.7160011.177.4200011.776.6250012.377.7315013.582.1400012.582.9500012.684.3630013.379.5800013.677.21000014.176.91250013.572.61600013.261.5SPL24.491.2N0.585.4median 12.3median 74.7Delta1.18.642.641.22930.527.825.725.822.632.528.522.423.324.520.619.43316.541.918.448.112.848.89.952.211.354.913.15611.466.51169.411.670.612.374.61275.912.475.512.276.61376.412.876.513.278.413.479.113.876.913.370.313.363.313.567.913.161.324.987.60.670.6median 13median 70.30.810.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTelekom T Phone ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Telekom T Phone Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Large battery and long runtimes in the T Phone Pro

Power consumption

The T Phone Pro's power consumption is well balanced, especially compared to other Dimensity 700 devices. Its low minimum consumption is especially good, which suggests it probably has great standby times. However, the rates could be lower in comparison with other processors and in view of its low maximum brightness.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 2.05 / 2.15 Watt
Load midlight 3.34 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
20%
-11%
-18%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.88
-44%
0.8
-31%
0.96
-57%
0.841 ?(0.61 - 1.28, n=8)
-38%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-47%
Idle Average *
2.05
1.47
28%
1
51%
2.31
-13%
2.1 ?(1.1 - 4.52, n=8)
-2%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
29%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
1.52
29%
1.4
35%
2.34
-9%
2.26 ?(1.2 - 4.58, n=8)
-5%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
3.34
5.38
-61%
2.4
28%
2.88
14%
4.39 ?(3.27 - 10.5, n=8)
-31%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-66%
Load Maximum *
5.4
6.62
-23%
4.6
15%
4.88
10%
6.21 ?(5.3 - 11.2, n=8)
-15%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-54%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.89 (1.099-5.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.96 (1.151-5.46)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.143 (1.073-1.61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.53 (2.07-3.02)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.14 (2.9-4.32)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.143 (1.073-1.61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

Battery life - The T Phone Pro's long charging times

The T Phone Pro's battery life is good. The device lasted over 14 hours in our realistic Wi-Fi test. However, OnePlus' Nord CE 2 Lite 5G managed even longer runtimes with a 5,000 mAh battery.

In everyday use, the T Phone Pro can even run for two days without stopping to recharge if it is not put through its paces too much. Compared with the normal T Phone, Telekom also offers wireless charging for the Pro model. However, it takes a long time until the battery is fully charged again. The T Phone Pro is 64 per cent charged after one hour, and it takes more than two hours on a 24-watt power supply for a full charge.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 11min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh
851 min
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
771 min
Honor X8
4000 mAh
858 min
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
1064 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
788 min

Pros

+ large display
+ great battery life
+ wireless charging
+ expandable storage

Cons

- dim display
- only the main camera is useable
- long charging times

Verdict - The T Phone lacks the Pro

Telekom T Phone Pro review. Test device provided by Telekom Germany.
Telekom T Phone Pro review. Test device provided by Telekom Germany.

Telekom have introduced their own line of smartphones: the T Phone and the T Phone Pro. While the normal T Phone scores with its low price, the Pro model has a harder time.

In the price range of the T Phone Pro, 5G reception is not a unique selling point - instead, it is pretty standard in the meantime. The main camera's pictures are usable when there is sufficient light, but they are by no means outstanding. The other lenses on the phone can be seen as decorative accessories. The display is large but quite dim and it only supports 60 Hz.

However, the biggest disappointment for a Pro model lies in its performance. Although there should be no problems in everyday use, but any more and the T Phone Pro will likely struggle. That is quite a shame, seeing as how Telekom have promised long updates for the device. 

The T Phone Pro is just as ambivalent when it comes to energy. Although the battery lasts for a long time, its charging times are unfortunately quite slow. 

The T Phone Pro isn't a bad device, but it is definitely missing some positive features.

At least the rest of its features are comprehensive with expandable storage, NFC and an audio jack. However, Samsung's Galaxy A33 offers more power, faster storage and similarly long updates. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite features even longer battery runtimes and a 120 Hz display.

Price and availability

The T Phone Pro is currently available to purchase in 10 European markets (Germany, Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) for around $300. At the time of writing, the phone is not yet available to purchase in the US.

Telekom T Phone Pro - 04/17/2023 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 83%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 88%
Camera
52%
Average
74%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Telekom T Phone Pro (T Phone Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Telekom T Phone Pro smartphone review - Happily big
Benedikt Winkel, 2023-04-19 (Update: 2023-04-19)