Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Tablet Review

Insanely slim. With a more compact chassis and a different screen ratio, the new Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 aims to outdo its predecessor. Our in-depth review will show whether this is a success despite – or because – of the shrunken dimensions.

For the original German review, see here.

Approximately one year after the Galaxy Tab S 10.5, Samsung launches its successor. As well as a different design, which is now similar to the smartphones from the Galaxy A series, the most noticeable change is the screen ratio: Instead of the 16:10 display of the old devices, the manufacturer now uses a Super-AMOLED panel with a 4:3 screen ratio. Once again, it is equipped with 3 GB of RAM as well as Samsung’s own 1.9 GHz octa-core SoC that is based on a newer chip generation. Our review unit is also equipped with the optional LTE modem and retailed for around 550 Euros (~$619) at the time of the review (RRP: 599 Euros/~$674). The Wi-Fi only version is 80 Euros (~$90) less expensive.

Direct rivals for the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 are the Apple iPad Air 2 as well as Android competitors like the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet and the slightly smaller Google Nexus 9. There are also some windows-based alternatives such as the much cheaper Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F as well as the slightly more expensive Surface 3 from Microsoft.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa 8 x 1.9 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T760 MP6, Core: 600 MHz
Memory
3 GB 
Display
9.70 inch 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo stereo jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Gyroscope, Ambient light sensor, compass, GPS, GLONASS, Wifi Direct, ANT+, OTG, MHL, Nano-SIM
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G-Quadband (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G-Quadband (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 4G-Octaband (700/800/850/900/1800/1900/2100/2600), SAR Body: 0.885 W/Kg
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.6 x 237.3 x 169 ( = 0.22 x 9.34 x 6.65 in)
Battery
22 Wh, 5870 mAh Lithium-Ion, 5870 mAh, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 30 h
Operating System
Android 5.0 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: 2.1 MP (fixed focus f/2.2, 1080p video @ 30 fps), main camera: 8 MP (auto focus f/1.9, 2560p video @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers at the bottom side, Keyboard: virtual, Power adaptor, USB cable, slot tool, Galaxy Apps, SideSync, WPS Office, Microsoft Office, Todoist, Smart Manager, Samsung TouchWiz UI, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
387 g ( = 13.65 oz / 0.85 pounds), Power Supply: 55 g ( = 1.94 oz / 0.12 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

Compared to its predecessor, the Galaxy Tab S 10.5, the new Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is noticeably smaller in term of the width and the length, which is mainly due to the new 4:3 screen ratio. According to the manufacturer, the slim construction of just 5.6 mm (~0.22 in) is particularly impressive and no comparison device can keep up with this. However, we have to be fair since the protruding camera is not included. We can measure 6.2 mm at this point (~0.24 in). The dimensions of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 can be compared with an iPad Air 2, but at 387 grams (~14 oz/ iPad Air 2 LTE: 444 grams/~16 oz), our review unit is much lighter.

While the design of the predecessor is reminiscent of the top smartphone Galaxy S5 , the new tablet follows the design philosophy of the Galaxy A smartphone series: The utilization of a metal frame, which has a noticeably polished edge that surrounds the device is new. Unfortunately it feels rather sharp to the touch, so the focus has probably been on the sophisticated design. The back of the device is still made of plastic, which provides a good grip. Unfortunately, it quickly collects fingerprints that are rather tricky to remove. At the rear are also two attachment points for the optional Book Cover.

The chassis of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 does show a certain degree of flexibility, but it is never a problem when you use the device – quite the contrary: With its metal frame, the device leaves a very sturdy impression, and twisting attempts only result in slight creaking noises. The small gaps complete the sophisticated impression.

Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Complete
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Front (portrait mode)
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Front (landscape mode)
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Memory card slots
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Buttons
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Home button
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Rear
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Camera
Galaxy Tab S2 9.7: Attachment point for the Book Cover
255.4 mm / 10.1 inch 183.4 mm / 7.22 inch 21 mm / 0.827 inch 934 g2.06 lbs267 mm / 10.5 inch 187 mm / 7.36 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 917 g2.02 lbs254 mm / 10 inch 167 mm / 6.57 inch 6.1 mm / 0.2402 inch 393 g0.866 lbs247.3 mm / 9.74 inch 177.3 mm / 6.98 inch 6.6 mm / 0.2598 inch 470 g1.036 lbs240 mm / 9.45 inch 169.5 mm / 6.67 inch 6.1 mm / 0.2402 inch 444 g0.979 lbs237.3 mm / 9.34 inch 169 mm / 6.65 inch 5.6 mm / 0.2205 inch 387 g0.853 lbs228.3 mm / 8.99 inch 153.7 mm / 6.05 inch 7.95 mm / 0.313 inch 422 g0.93 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity

The SoC Exynos 5433 Octa in the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 can reach 1.9 GHz and is – as with the predecessor – supported by 3 GB of memory. The capacity of the flash storage on the other hand has doubled from 16 to 32 GB in all configurations, and around 25.2 GB can be used for your own files and apps ex-works. It is possible to expand the storage via microSD-card (up to 128 GB). In principal, the tablet can transfer apps to the microSD-card, but the app has to be able to support this feature.

Samsung uses a Micro-USB 2.0 port for the connection with the power adaptor or external devices – it is unfortunate that you do not get a faster USB 3.0 port with the comfortable USB Type-C jack. Nevertheless, the port still supports some useful additional features: In addition to USB-OTG for the attachment of external peripherals, you can also use the MHL interface to transfer the display content. Wireless communication methods include Bluetooth 4.1, Wi-Fi Direct as well as ANT+. Furthermore, it is easy to stream contents to corresponding devices within the home network. Unlike its predecessor, the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 does not have an infrared transmitter, and once again, NFC is not included.

A positive aspect is that the tablet is equipped with a vibration motor for tactile feedback, but a notification LED, which is usually available on Android smartphones, is not included.

Left side: No ports
Left side: No ports
Right side: Nano-SIM slot, microSD slot, microphone, volume rocker, power button
Right side: Nano-SIM slot, microSD slot, microphone, volume rocker, power button
Bottom: Speaker, 3.5 mm headset port, micro-USB, speaker
Bottom: Speaker, 3.5 mm headset port, micro-USB, speaker
Top: No ports
Top: No ports

Software

Samsung uses the operating system Android 5.0.2 with its own user interface TouchWiz. The software is very easy to use in its latest iteration and offers many additional features and settings. Unfortunately, it is not yet clear if there will be an update to Android 5.1 or 6.0.

By default, on the left side of the home screen is a news feed (Flipboard Briefing), but it is easy to deactivate it if you do not like it. There are also some preloaded third-party apps (for example, HRS Hotels, WPS Office, Todoist, pizza.de, Facebook, Twitter), which can be removed if necessary. However, this is not the case for the preloaded Microsoft Office components (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, Skype, and OneDrive). They can be deactivated, but not removed completely.

You also get some useful Samsung apps that can convince with their additional features. The app Smart Switch, for instance, improves the switch from an existing smartphone, and you can transfer settings, contacts and files depending on the source. The SideSync app is particularly interesting and allows remote control of the tablet via Windows PC or another mobile device. Although we did not manage to establish a connection with another Samsung tablet during the review, it was easy via a notebook after we had installed the Samsung software. The split-screen mode of the Galaxy S2 9.7 is also useful and can be activated with a long push on the left touch button.

Lock screen with notifications
Home screen
App drawer
Notifications & Settings
Recently opened apps
Split-screen view with movable keyboard
Specs of the review unit

Communication & GPS 

Fast Internet connections are provided by a Wi-Fi module with support for all current standards in 2.4 as well as 5 GHz networks (a/b/g/n/ac). We managed gross transfer rates of up to 780 Mbps in a 5 GHz network with the router Asus RT-AC56U, and the value dropped to around 450 Mbps when we increased the distance (theoretical maximum of 866 Mbps). The signal strength and range, respectively, were good and on par with comparable devices in both bands.

Our review unit can also use the integrated WWAN module to establish an Internet connection with transfer rates of up to 300 Mbps (LTE Cat. 6). It covers the common frequencies here in Germany. It is even possible to combine the Wi-Fi and WWAN modules for larger downloads (up from 30 MB) via an optional Booster function. However, the tablet does not only support mobile data transfers, it is also possible to make calls. Due to the lack of an earpiece, you either have to use the integrated hands-free function or a headset (not provided). The integrated microphone works well, as long as the distance to the user does not get too big. The other person is also easy to understand via speaker, but the maximum volume is not sufficient for calls in noisier environments. The signal quality was always perfect during the review in the T-Mobile network.

GPS signal indoors
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal outdoors
GPS signal outdoors

A precise location of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is not only possible via GPS, but also GLONASS. The location was determined within seconds outdoors, but the sat fix took a few minutes on the third floor of a four-story apartment building and the connection was very weak. A comparison with the bicycle navigation device Garmin Edge 500 on a test ride showed that the tablet tends to take shortcuts in difficult situations like the bridge crossing (last picture). The overall deviation is still just around 1%, so the performance of the GPS module is good. This means that our review unit is slightly better than the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet, but it cannot quite reach the very good result of the Apple iPad Air 2.

Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 - Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Crossing
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Crossing
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 - Turning point

Cameras & Multimedia

Main camera
Main camera
Front camera
Front camera

Like its predecessor, Galaxy Tab S 10.5, the new Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is equipped with an 8 MP camera at the rear (3264x2448 pixels, 4:3) as well as a 2.1 MP front camera (1920x1080 pixels, 16:9). However, Samsung now uses lens that capture more light: The main camera has a maximum aperture of f/1.9 instead of f/2.4 (front camera f/2.2 instead of f/2.4).

The picture quality on the other hand has not really changed: The pictures of the main camera are still good for a tablet, but it cannot compete with the best smartphone solutions. Nevertheless, the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 creates high-contrast pictures, particularly under good lighting conditions, that leave a consistent impression. You can, however, see blurry edges when you zoom in. Another problem for dark environments is the lack of the LED flash that is inherent from the predecessor, so you cannot compensate the resulting picture noise. The position of the lens at the edge of the tablet is not perfect: You always have to be careful with your fingers when you want to take a picture in landscape mode.

As expected, the front camera cannot keep up with the main camera in terms of picture quality. The resulting images appear comparatively pale and slightly blurry.

In addition to the automatic mode, you can also switch to a professional mode for the main camera. It allows manual settings for the ISO value and the white balance and provides exposure compensation. Live effect filters are also available in this mode. Other shooting modes include HDR and panorama (picture height around 1000 pixels depending on the picture) as well as an option to activate both cameras simultaneously. Selfies with the front camera can also be edited with a soft focus function.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

The main camera of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 can record videos with the QHD resolution (2560x1440 pixels) at 30 frames per second, while the predecessor was limited to Full HD. The highest resolution does, however, not include the possibility to use effect filters and the electronic image stabilization. Pictures cannot be taken during the recording in this mode, either. The high-contrast and sharp videos convince in both FHD and QHD, and the pictures during the recording even show more details and more vivid colors than the images with the front camera. The latter can also be used to record videos in 1080p at 30 frames per second. The results are smooth and the quality is more than sufficient for video calls.

Sound recordings convince with their good understandability of voices in particular, but the sound is not very differentiated or balanced. It is more of a solid and average result.

Accessories

Samsung ships the tablet with only a quick-start guide, a power adaptor with a charging cable (5.0 V, 2 A) as well as a small metal tool to open the card slots. The manufacturer also offers a so-called Book Cover for 69.90 Euros (~$79), which is designed specifically for the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7.

Warranty

Samsung offers a 24-month warranty for the tablet, but this does not include the battery (only 12 months) or the supplied accessories (only 6 months).

Input Devices & Handling

Thanks to the accurate touchscreen, the handling of the tablet is never an issue. Slight touches are sufficient to trigger inputs – the device sometimes even reacts before you actually touch the screen. This is supported by the smooth glass surface that provides excellent gliding capabilities for the fingers. The physical buttons have well-defined pressure points and are firmly integrated into the chassis, which leaves a sophisticated impression.

The fingerprint scanner no longer works with swipes but is integrated into the home button – it is now sufficient to put your finger on the button as with the top smartphones Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, respectively. The detection rate was very decent during our review, so it really improves the comfort compared to the input of a password or locking pattern. It is also possible to use it for purchases in Samsung’s own app store or for logins on websites.

The integrated Samsung keyboard supports all common features like word predictions and the input via swipe gesture. German umlauts are directly accessible as well. It is possible to adjust the size of the keyboard based on your personal preferences. Other features are the adjustable position on the screen as well as the split-view for improved input with the thumbs.

The system always reacts quickly to inputs. There were no annoying stutters, animations were very smooth and even the switching between apps was easy. The situation is similar for the display rotation: The contents are quickly adjusted by the position sensor.

Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard landscape mode
Keyboard landscape mode

Display

The Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is equipped with a 9.7-inch Super-AMOLED panel with a 4:3 screen ratio. It has a native resolution of 2048x1536 pixels, which results in a pixel density of 264 ppi and is therefore slightly lower compared to the Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (288 ppi). However, this is not a bad value, and the review unit is actually on par with Apple's iPad Air 2. The subjective impression is sufficiently sharp anyway, but obviously, it cannot compete with smaller smartphone panels that use similarly high resolutions. One disadvantage of the Super-AMOLED technology seems to be the green and red color fringes in some situations – usually with shades of gray – but they are only visible when you look really closely.

The average luminance is noticeably higher compared to the predecessor (291 cd/m²) at 357 cd/m² with the manual setting. The display can be much brighter and even exceeds the maximum value when the luminance is adjusted automatically. The brightness distribution of 86% is similar to the old model and not as good as the rivals, but it is subjectively still pretty even.

336
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 389 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 356.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 358 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.38 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.24
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2048x1536 px 9.7'' (Super AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
2560x1600 px 10.5'' (Super AMOLED)
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
2048x1536 px 9.7'' (Retina)
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2560x1600 px 10.1'' (Triluminos)
Google Nexus 9
2048x1536 px 8.9'' (IPS)
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
1920x1200 px 10.1'' (IPS)
Microsoft Surface 3
1920x1280 px 10.8'' (IPS)
Screen
Brightness middle
358
290
-19%
423
18%
471
32%
430
20%
414
16%
399
11%
Brightness
357
291
-18%
427
20%
457
28%
411
15%
388
9%
380
6%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
92
7%
92
7%
92
7%
90
5%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.61
0.46
0.77
0.55
0.49
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.78
2.37
-33%
2.86
-61%
8.69
-388%
3.17
-78%
5.05
-184%
1.66
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.38
2.03
-47%
2.37
-72%
11.24
-714%
3.29
-138%
5.14
-272%
2.75
-99%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.43 91%
2.17 101%
2.39 92%
2.37 93%
2.22 99%
CCT
6366 102%
6521 100%
6941 94%
9508 68%
6746 96%
7386 88%
6358 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
100
88
62
64.4
Contrast
693
1024
558
753
814
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
98.8
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.24

* ... smaller is better

Because of the AMOLED technology with self-emitting pixels, the display does not need background illumination that is common for LCD panels. The black value is therefore 0 cd/m², so in theory the display of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 manages an infinite contrast ratio. No other comparison device except for the predecessor uses this panel technology, so the review unit occupies the top position in this section. The subjective impression with brilliant picture contents and rich colors is also very good.

Depending on the scenario or the personal preferences, you can choose between different preset colors in the Android settings (modes: AMOLED Cinema, AMOLED Photo, Simple, Reading mode). There is also an "adjustable display" option, which is supposed to automatically adjust the saturation as well as the sharpness of the panel based on the content.

The most natural mode is the "Simple" setting. It manages excellent results compared to the sRGB color space with a color temperature of 6334 K (ideal: 6500 K) and extremely low color deviations. The AMOLED Photo mode on the other hand, is focused on the AdobeRGB color space and therefore offers a wider color gamut and richer colors as a result, but still similarly low deviations as well as a comparable color temperature. The AMOLED Cinema mode increases these on purpose, while the Reading mode shifts the colors significantly towards a warmer area.

Grayscale (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Simple, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Photo, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Cinema, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Reading mode, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Simple, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Simple, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Photo, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Photo, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Cinema, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Cinema, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Reading mode, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: Reading mode, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Simple, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Simple, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Photo, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Photo, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Cinema, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Cinema, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Reading mode, target color space AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (profile: Reading mode, target color space AdobeRGB)

Thanks to its excellent contract and the luminance boost that adjusts brightness automatically, the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is suitable for use in the outdoors. You should still avoid direct sunlight to minimize reflections, which is the case for pretty much every touch panel. The reflections are actually less of a problem on this panel compared to many devices with LCD screens, but in return, you can see purple-blue reflection patterns under certain viewing angles.

Display outdoors
Display outdoors
Display under direct sunlight
Display under direct sunlight

The viewing angle stability of the review unit leaves a good impression: Contents are perfectly visible from every position, and the brightness decrease is pretty moderate without inversions. There is still some criticism: You can see a color shift towards blue-green when you do not look at a 90-degree angle, which is particularly noticeable on white areas.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance

The Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is equipped with an Exynos 5433 Octa SoC from Samsung’s own production. Unlike the Exynos 5420 Octa inside the predecessor, the new model now supports 64-bit. One cluster of four Cortex-A57 cores running at up to 1.9 GHz is complemented by four more frugal Cortex-A53 cores that can reach 1.3 GHz. Graphics are handled by a Mali-T760 MP6 GPU, which is also a part of the SoC. This chip was already used for the Galaxy Note 4 phablet back in 2014.

Graphics benchmarks show clear advantages for the Galaxy Tab S2 over the Galaxy Tab 10.5 due to the higher native resolution of the latter. Otherwise, our review unit trades blows quite evenly compared to its closest competitors in most other tests.

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
52308 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
63292 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
56412 Points +8%
Google Nexus 9
56577 Points +8%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
4221 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4530 Points +7%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
3949 Points -6%
Google Nexus 9
3154 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface 3
3350 Points -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1247 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1816 Points +46%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1298 Points +4%
Google Nexus 9
1879 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface 3
990 Points -21%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
588 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
770 MFLOPS +31%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
2429 MFLOPS +313%
Google Nexus 9
892 MFLOPS +52%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
334 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
382.8 MFLOPS +15%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1021 MFLOPS +206%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
0 MFLOPS -100%
Google Nexus 9
671 MFLOPS +101%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
820 Points +27%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1263 Points +95%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
758 Points +17%
Google Nexus 9
516 Points -20%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
1032 Points -25%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4920 Points +255%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2683 Points +94%
Google Nexus 9
8602 Points +521%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
468 Points -21%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
832 Points +41%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
954 Points +62%
Google Nexus 9
1509 Points +156%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
1555 Points -46%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4104 Points +43%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2488 Points -13%
Google Nexus 9
1729 Points -40%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
886 Points -20%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1967 Points +78%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1482 Points +34%
Google Nexus 9
1845 Points +67%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
4489 points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
3435 points -23%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
4138 points -8%
Google Nexus 9
4435 points -1%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12400 points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
6946 points -44%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7118 points -43%
Google Nexus 9
3910 points -68%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
4441 Points -20%
Google Nexus 9
5841 Points +5%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
19867 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
13908 Points -30%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
21707 Points +9%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
24566 Points +24%
Google Nexus 9
26455 Points +33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
20482 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
13791 Points -33%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
31542 Points +54%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
37312 Points +82%
Google Nexus 9
39070 Points +91%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17981 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
14333 Points -20%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
10379 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
11189 Points -38%
Google Nexus 9
12420 Points -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
14 fps -52%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
52.1 fps +80%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
37 fps +28%
Google Nexus 9
43.4 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
22.8 fps -40%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
70.4 fps +85%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
54 fps +42%
Google Nexus 9
57.8 fps +52%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
5.5 fps -68%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
37.6 fps +121%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
26 fps +53%
Google Nexus 9
31 fps +82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
2.8 fps -77%
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
27 fps +125%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
16 fps +33%
Google Nexus 9
22.5 fps +88%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 Apple A8X, PowerVR GXA6850, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 9 Nvidia Tegra K1 (Denver), NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F Intel Atom Z3745, Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash

The situation in the browser test is comparable to the benchmarks: The Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 does beat its predecessor in all scenarios, but cannot really compete with any of the rivals. Only the Windows-based Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F is even worse in Google’s Octane V2 as well as the V8 benchmark. The subjective performance impression is still more than sufficient for smooth web browsing.

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
4588 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
10512 Points
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7790 Points
Google Nexus 9
8210 Points
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
3531 Points
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1016 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
1112 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
291.1 ms *
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
553 ms *
Google Nexus 9
919 ms *
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
446 ms *
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6483 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
7847 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
2396 ms *
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
4064 ms *
Google Nexus 9
4031 ms *
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
79 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
158 Points
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
93 Points
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
7197 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
5335 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
9355 Points
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7177 Points
Google Nexus 9
10142 Points
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
3253 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
41.12 Points

* ... smaller is better

The internal flash storage with a capacity of 32 GB is much faster compared to the old Galaxy Tab S 10.5 and can beat it in all tests. Better is the enemy of good, though: All the comparison devices with Android or iOS operating system are slightly faster.

We also checked the performance of the microSD slot in combination with a Toshiba Exceria SD-CX32UHS1 memory card (UHS-I Class 3, up to 85 MB/s reading, up to 50 MB/s writing). The Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 manages good sequential transfer rates of 82 MB/s (read) and 33 MB/s (write). The performance is also decent with small files at 11 MB/s (read), only the writing result was very low at 0.1 MB/s.

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
9.82 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
1.56 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
13.6 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
14.49 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
25.56 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
12.1 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
20 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
36.22 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
49.37 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
15.72 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
81 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
75.5 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
248.2 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
89.8 MB/s
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
256 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
279.2 MB/s
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
468 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
832 Points
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
954 Points
Google Nexus 9
1509 Points

Games

Despite the defeat against the even more powerful competition in the benchmarks, the performance of the Mali-T760 MP6 GPU is actually sufficient even for demanding games like Asphalt 8 (high details) or Modern Combat 5. This obviously also means that simpler titles like Angry Birds, for example, are no problem for the smartphone, either.

The integrated position sensors as well as the very precise touchscreen complemented the gaming experience. Another positive aspect is that at least one of the speakers is not covered by the hands when you use the tablet in landscape mode.

Screenshot Asphalt 8
Screenshot Asphalt 8
Screenshot Angry Birds
Screenshot Angry Birds

Emissions

Temperature

We can measure idle temperatures of around 30 °C (~86 °F), so the review unit is very comfortable to hold under light workloads. The values only reach a moderate 40.8 °C (~105 °F) under load, so the tablet is never inconveniently warm. Some rivals like the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet (up to 47.4 °C/~117 °F) or the Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F (51.7 °C/~125 °F), for example, reach much higher temperatures. So how can Samsung keep the powerful octa-core SoC so cool in such a slim construction?

We get the answer in the GFXBench Battery Test, which repeats the T-Rex test thirty times and logs the performance, the temperature development and the battery consumption. Unfortunately, the performance of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is not very good. The frame rates already drop by around 14% during the eighth run – and it gets even worse: Once again, the performance drops significantly by 40% during run number 22 compared to the original value. The GPU only runs at up to 350 MHz in this case instead of 600 MHz at the start. The temperatures cannot be the reason, because at 36 °C (~97 °F), they are just lukewarm. Samsung rolled-out an update for our review unit that is supposed to increase the performance shortly before we finished the review, but the problem was still reproducible after the update. Longer gaming sessions can therefore suffer from annoying stutters, which is why we deduct points in the Temperature rating.

GFXBench: Performance
GFXBench: Performance
GFXBench: Frametimes
GFXBench: Frametimes
GFXBench: Clocks
GFXBench: Clocks
GFXBench: Temperature development
GFXBench: Temperature development
GFXBench: Battery capacity
GFXBench: Battery capacity
Max. Load
 40.8 °C
105 F
40.8 °C
105 F
33.1 °C
92 F
 
 32.8 °C
91 F
32 °C
90 F
30.6 °C
87 F
 
 31 °C
88 F
32 °C
90 F
30.4 °C
87 F
 
Maximum: 40.8 °C = 105 F
Average: 33.7 °C = 93 F
32.9 °C
91 F
35.3 °C
96 F
35.7 °C
96 F
29.4 °C
85 F
31.3 °C
88 F
31.2 °C
88 F
28.9 °C
84 F
29.4 °C
85 F
29.9 °C
86 F
Maximum: 35.7 °C = 96 F
Average: 31.6 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.2 °C = 103 F | Room Temperature 23.2 °C = 74 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Speakers

Underneath each of the two perforated grilles at the bottom edge of the tablet is a speaker module. Even though bass is obviously missing, the two modules produce a decent sound, which is pretty balanced until you really crank it up. The performance should be sufficient for the occasional video playback in quiet environments, but larger rooms would require a higher maximum volume. Music enthusiasts should use headphones anyway; the sound output of our review unit via 3.5 mm stereo jack was flawless.

Energy Management

Power Consumption

If you compare the measurement results of the new model with the predecessor, Galaxy Tab S 10.5, you can quickly see that the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 consumes more power in all scenarios, only the maximum value is identical. The idle operation in particular leaves room for improvements in comparison with the competition: Both the iPad Air 2 and the Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F  consume only half the power.

The supplied power adaptor has a nominal output of 10 watts (5 V, 2 A), which means that it has a pretty hard time to charge the battery when you use the tablet at the same time. A complete recharge takes about three and a half hours when the device is in standby. A normal USB port can only be used to charge the tablet when it is turned off.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.3 / 4.5 / 5 Watt
Load midlight 9.4 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 870
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Surface 3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
2.3
2.1
9%
1.2
48%
2.6
-13%
1.3
43%
2.5
-9%
Idle Average *
4.5
3.4
24%
5.1
-13%
4.9
-9%
4.6
-2%
7
-56%
Idle Maximum *
5
3.9
22%
5.4
-8%
5.2
-4%
5
-0%
8.4
-68%
Load Average *
9.4
7.4
21%
7.9
16%
7.5
20%
9
4%
11.2
-19%
Load Maximum *
10.4
10.4
-0%
11.1
-7%
9.2
12%
11.2
-8%
12.4
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Unfortunately, the slimmer chassis construction also results in a 25% lower battery capacity compared to the predecessor. Therefore, it is not surprising that the runtimes are shorter when you consider the higher consumption: The stamina is reduced by 19% while idling, while the disadvantage is reduced to 14% under load. The more realistic Wi-Fi test produces results that are easily comparable thanks to the adjusted display brightness of around 150 cd/m² – but the results of our review unit are below average. The similarly slim Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet, for example, manages almost two hours more, despite the same battery capacity. The situation is better when you watch videos: The stamina was dramatically improved over the predecessor with our Big Buck Bunny test and the result in now between the slightly weaker iPad Air 2 and the slightly better Xperia Z4 Tablet. One reason for this could be the changed screen ratio: The 16:9 sample video is simply smaller on the 4:3 screen of the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 compared to the 16:10 panel of the Galaxy Tab S 10.5. This should result in lower power consumption due to the Super-AMOLED technology.

We have to mention that Samsung uses a trick to increase the battery runtimes: The display brightness will be noticeably dimmed when the battery capacity drops below 5%, independent of the settings and without the energy-saving mode. The Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 has two additional energy-saving modes: An ultra-energy-saving mode, where the display only shows the contents in gray and the availability of Wi-Fi, Bluetooth as well as mobile data is limited. The normal energy-saving mode is less restrictive: It reduces the CPU performance, deactivates the illumination of the sensor buttons and the vibration motor and reduces the luminance as well as the refresh rate of the display.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 45)
6h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 51min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Yoga 2-1051F
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Surface 3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
918
1094
19%
1364
49%
2135
133%
1422
55%
1420
55%
828
-10%
H.264
651
395
-39%
562
-14%
705
8%
597
-8%
WiFi v1.3
393
525
34%
437
11%
Load
291
333
14%
212
-27%
166
-43%
224
-23%
226
-22%
173
-41%
WiFi
600
630
574
923
425

Pros

+ very thin and light
+ sophisticated build quality
+ microSD-card slot
+ AC Wi-Fi & Bluetooth 4.1
+ fingerprint scanner
+ precise touchscreen
+ great display with excellent contrast & colors
+ video recording in QHD
+ telephone functions
+ smooth handling

Cons

- only average performance
- heavy throttling
- color changes from flat viewing angles
- only Micro-USB 2.0
- no NFC
- IR transmitter of the predecessor is missing

Verdict

In Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

The highlights of Samsung's new tablet are the restrained, yet sophisticated and very slim construction as well as the new 4:3 Super-AMOLED screen. It can easily keep up with its excellent predecessor and convinces with a great contrast ratio, good outdoor capabilities and brilliant and accurate colors. The comprehensive features with AC-Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.1, and LTE Cat. 6 as well as a fingerprint scanner do not have to hide, either. It is, however, unfortunate, that NFC is not available. Another advantage is the phone function of the device when you use the built-in hands-free feature or a headset. The internal storage with a capacity of 32 GB can be expanded via microSD card (up to 128 GB) if necessary. 

Once again, at the back is an 8 MP camera, but it can now record videos in QHD with very sharp images. The picture quality on the other hand has hardly changed compared to the predecessor: The quality is decent for a tablet, but it cannot compete with very good smartphones solutions. It is unfortunate that the new model has dispensed with the LED flash of the predecessor.

The battery runtimes are shorter, and the results of our review unit are – depending on the scenario – average at best. A more serious issue is Samsung’s decision to throttle the SoC under sustained load. Performance deficits of up to 40% are neither common nor really necessary due to the moderate temperatures. The device cannot convince in this respect.

Samsung's Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 is a very good looking and sophisticated tablet, which should in practice appeal to many users thanks to its compact dimensions, low weight and a great display. However, you will have to live with mediocre battery runtimes as well as throttling issues under sustained load.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE - 04/13/2016 v5(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
79 / 80 → 99%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
44 / 65 → 68%
Weight
85 / 40-88 → 94%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
46 / 68 → 67%
Application Performance
50 / 76 → 66%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
72 / 85 → 85%
Average
75%
88%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Andreas Kilian, 2015-10- 7 (Update: 2018-05-15)