Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P

Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P
Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
512 MB 
Display
3.5 inch 3:2, 480x320 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, TFT, glossy: yes
Storage
4 GB Flash, 4 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 32 GB, Sensors: GPS, Glonass, NFC, WiFi Direct, S Beam
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.55 x 113 x 62 ( = 0.45 x 4.45 x 2.44 in)
Battery
5 Wh Lithium-Ion, 1300 mAh, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 858 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 366 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 640 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 380 h
Operating System
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean
Camera
Webcam: Rear camera: 5 Megapixel (2.560 x 1.920 Pixel), Front: (640 x 480 Pixel)
Additional features
Speakers: speaker on the back, Keyboard: virtual, S Planner, Samsung Apps, ChatON, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
121 g ( = 4.27 oz / 0.27 pounds), Power Supply: 44 g ( = 1.55 oz / 0.1 pounds)
Price
299 Euro

 

Average Score: 58.8% - poor
Average of 5 scores (from 4 reviews)
price: 60%, performance: 34%, features: 53%, display: 79% mobility: 98%, workmanship: 80%, ergonomy: 62%, emissions: 96%

Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P

84% Review Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P Smartphone | Notebookcheck
Little star? Affordable, stylish and handy: Samsung's Galaxy Fame is aimed especially at young customers. But perhaps it can also attract other target groups with features like a 5 megapixel camera and NFC.
60% Samsung Galaxy Fame review: budget Android smartphone is cheap, not cheerful
Source: PC Advisor English
There's nothing wrong with a cheap, functional smartphone, and the Galaxy Fame is exactly that. The trouble is that even at this price the Fame is being squeezed out by much better phones that cost roughly the same amount. Windows-toting Lumia 520 is a much better performer at a similar size, and the Moto's E and -G knock the Fame for six. It's not a bad deal, but for just a tiny bit more there are better deals to be had.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 40% features: 70% workmanship: 80%
50% Samsung Galaxy Fame review
Source: Techradar English
The Samsung Galaxy Fame is not a phone that will live forever, and it hasn't quite learned to fly. It is clear from the very outset that Samsung has used the ingredients to create a lower-end smartphone, such as the smaller internal chipset, the smaller screen and the low internal storage. We can see the Samsung Galaxy Fame selling a fair few units, especially given its super low price tag, and we don't see that as a bad thing, given that the majority of users will likely be young, and wanting a way of connecting to Facebook, but for anything more substantial, the handset really struggles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2013
Rating: Total score: 50%
50% Samsung Galaxy Fame review
Source: Techradar English
The Samsung Galaxy Fame is not a phone that will live forever, and it hasn't quite learned to fly. It is clear from the very outset that Samsung has used the ingredients to create a lower-end smartphone, such as the smaller internal chipset, the smaller screen and the low internal storage. We can see the Samsung Galaxy Fame selling a fair few units, especially given its super low price tag, and we don't see that as a bad thing, given that the majority of users will likely be young, and wanting a way of connecting to Facebook, but for anything more substantial, the handset really struggles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2013
Rating: Total score: 50%
50% Samsung Galaxy Fame review
Source: Techradar English
We can see the Samsung Galaxy Fame selling a fair few units, especially given its super low price tag, and we don't see that as a bad thing, given that the majority of users will likely be young, and wanting a way of connecting to Facebook, but for anything more substantial, the handset really struggles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2013
Rating: Total score: 50%

Comment

Broadcom VideoCore-IV: Tile based renderer with up to 4 cores (depending on the SoC).

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.


BCM28155: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


3.5":

This is one of the smallest diagonal for smartphones.

Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


0.121 kg:

Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.


Samsung: The Samsung Group is composed of numerous international businesses, all united under the Samsung brand in South Korea. The meaning of the Korean word Samsung is "tristar" or "three stars". The Samsung brand is one of the most important brands of South Korea. Samsung is an international notebook manufacturer of medium size according market shares and reviews.

Samsung reviews


58.8%: Such a bad rating is rare. There exist hardly any notebooks, which are rated worse.


» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime
Mali-T830 MP2, Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.167 kg
Samsung Galaxy C7
unknown, unknown, 5.7", 0.169 kg
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890 Octa, 5.7", 0.17 kg
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active
Adreno 530, Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, 5.1", 0.185 kg
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7580 Octa, 5.5", 0.17 kg
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
Mali-T720, Exynos 3475 Quad, 4.5", 0.131 kg
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 5.2", 0.159 kg
Samsung Galaxy J3
Mali-400 MP2, Spreadtrum SC8830, 5.0", 0.138 kg
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
unknown, Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, 6.0", 0.2 kg
Samsung Galaxy A7 2016
Adreno 405, Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, 5.5", 0.172 kg
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890 Octa, 5.5", 0.157 kg
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890 Octa, 5.1", 0.152 kg
Samsung Galaxy J2
Mali-T720 MP2, unknown, 4.7", 0.129 kg
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7580 Octa, 5.2", 0.155 kg
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7578, 4.7", 0.131 kg
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7580 Octa, 5.1", 0.145 kg
Samsung Galaxy J7-SM-J700F
Adreno 405, Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, 5.5", 0.171 kg
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 5", 0.147 kg
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo
Adreno 305, Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, 4.8", 0.132 kg
Samsung Galaxy A8
Adreno 405, Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, 5.7", 0.151 kg
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420 Octa, 5.7", 0.171 kg
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420 Octa, 5.7", 0.153 kg
Samsung Galaxy J1
Mali-400 MP2, Spreadtrum SC8830, 4.3", 0.122 kg
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420 Octa, 5.1", 0.15 kg
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
GC7000UL, Armada PXA1908, 4.5", 0.154 kg
Samsung Galaxy E5
Adreno 306, Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 5.0", 0.12 kg
Samsung Galaxy E7
Adreno 306, Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 5.5", 0.141 kg
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420 Octa, 5.1", 0.132 kg
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420 Octa, 5.1", 0.138 kg
Current Prices
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Library > Samsung > Samsung Galaxy Fame GT-S6810P
Stefan Hinum, 2013-06-23 (Update: 2013-06-23)