Oppo Reno4
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Dual: 32MP (f/2.4, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Pricecompare
Average of 11 scores (from 44 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo Reno4
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: KL Gadget Guy Archive.org version
Generally, the Oppo Reno4 is a phone that I see myself recommending to my friends, especially to those who want a reliable daily driver. You can get the Reno4 via OPPO’s official online store, as well as Lazada and Shopee.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Source: Hitech Century Archive.org version
As it stands, the OPPO Reno 4 is a fairly good midrange phone with a good balance of performance, a vibrant Super AMOLED display and a competent set of cameras for casual usage. If you’re looking for a sub RM1.7K phone, this makes for a sound choice though those seeking a more powerful solution with a 90Hz display and even faster battery charging ought to gravitate towards the slightly better specced OPPO Reno 4 Pro for RM700 more.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Pokde Archive.org version
After using both the Reno4 and Reno4 Pro for quite some time, I feel that both are rather capable smartphones. I feel fine with the hardware that the OPPO Reno4 brings but you are missing out on the nicer finish of the Reno4 Pro and the 90Hz refresh rate.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 65% performance: 78% mobility: 78% workmanship: 80%
Source: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
This device has impressive features, especially on the camera segment. The flexible slow motion that shoots 1080p quality, stabilization on all video clips, this device is one to get when you’re into creativity and entertainment. It also offers easy content creation, security, and satisfaction. For the price of P18,990(8GB+128GB), OPPO Reno 4 is a powerful device with tons of features that is bang for the buck.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2020
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2020
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Compared to the OPPO Reno3, the Reno4 did receive a lot of improvements. It’s got better performance, faster-charging, more attractive design, and impressive cameras. First-time Reno buyers will definitely like this, however, those who just recently bought the Reno3 might get upset about the quick succession.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2020
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Nextpit Germany DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 51% performance: 79% features: 91% mobility: 77% workmanship: 89%
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80%
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→EN
Positive: Pleasant ergonomy; light weight; excellent cameras; good price; fast charging. Negative: Weak processor; no NFC; no headphone jack; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2021
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; decent processor; good price; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2020
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent battery life; quick charging; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2020
Source: Nextpit France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; excellent display; high performance; support 5G; nice cameras; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2020
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 770% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; big screen; nice display; decent cameras; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; high performance; excellent cameras; long battery life; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/11/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; elegant design; great built quality; decent hardware; high performance; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2020
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; nice cameras; decent gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2020
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; slim size; light weight; nice cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for women; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; big screen; nice display; decent cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2020
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; impressive cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/29/2020
Source: VNReview VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; light weight; nice performance; quick charging; nice display; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/10/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; quick charging; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; excellent cameras; decent hardware.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; attractive price; decent hardware; modern design; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/05/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; quick charging; high gaming performance; nice quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; nice cameras; quick charging. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/02/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive cameras; nice display; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; excellent cameras; high performance; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice AI cameras; quick charging; slim size; light weight; elegant design; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; big screen; excellent cameras; nice display.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice selfie camera; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; powerful hardware; nice quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; decent hardware; nice cameras; good autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/22/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice triple cameras; powerful processor; very quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2020
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 620: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 765 and 765G) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2. The 765G variant is 10% faster than the one integrated in the 765 and 20% faster than the Adreno 618 predecessor.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 765G: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 475 cores (one fast ARM Cortex-A76 prime core at up to 2.4 GHz, one A76 gold core at 2.2 GHz and 6 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz). As one of the first SoCs it also integrates a 5G modem (Snapdragon X52 up to 3,7 / 1,6 Mbps down- and upload, mmWave and Sub-6 support). The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.43":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.77%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.