NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) graphics card review

With the GeForce GTX 1650 Super, there's an inexpensive Turing GPU from Nvidia that is equipped with the TU116 graphics chip. The power consumption is 100 watts, which makes operation without an additional power supply impossible. You can find out how well the GeForce GTX 1650 Super does against an AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT in this short review.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 02/03/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Nvidia's cheapest Turing graphics card is still named GeForce GTX 1650, but the GeForce GTX 1650 Super is now another inexpensive entry-level model. The biggest changes compared with the non-Super version of the GTX 1650 are in the installed graphics chip and VRAM. We're already familiar with the graphics chip from the GeForce GTX 1660 or the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, although the number of shaders is a bit lower in the GeForce GTX 1650 Super at 1,280. In terms of VRAM, the faster GDDR6 is now also available, but it still only has 4 GB. Nevertheless, the GeForce GTX 1650 Super has no problem surpassing the GeForce GTX 1650 in terms of performance.

Due to its compactness, the graphics card is suitable for small cases. Power consumption is specified at 100 watts, which closes the gap between the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 1660. The KFA2 model that we tested has a 6-pin power connector internally and offers one DVI-D, one DisplayPort 1.4, and one HDMI 2.0b port externally. The manufacturer's warranty is two years with KFA2.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super for desktops is an entry-level gaming graphics card based on the Turing architecture. The chip, which has been named TU116, was introduced in November 2019. The GTX 1650 series does not offer ray tracing and tensor cores, unlike the more powerful RTX 2000 cards (e.g. RTX 2060). Performance is slightly better than with the GeForce GTX 1650 and comparable with the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

There have also been significant improvements in the Turing architecture in terms of the CUDA cores. Float and INT operations can now be executed simultaneously, the cache has been unified and improved, and Adaptive Shading has been introduced. As a result, Nvidia speaks of an up to 50% higher performance per core compared to Pascal.

The new entry-level card benefits from the advantages of the TU116 chip, since the newer NVENC video encoding delivers more performance compared to Pascal.

Nvidia specifies a power consumption of 100 watts TGP (Total Graphics Power) for the graphics card. The TU11 chip is manufactured by TSMC in a 12 nm FFN process.

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz	192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz	192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	1280 @ 1.53 GHz	192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz	192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz	128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz	128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz	128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz	128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz	128 Bit @ 8000 MHz

Architecture

Turing

Pipelines

1280 - unified

Core Speed

1530 MHz

Shader Speed

1785 MHz

Memory Speed

14000 MHz

Memory Bus Width

192 Bit

Memory Type

GDDR6

Max. Amount of Memory

4 GB

Shared Memory

API

DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.5, OpenGL 4.6

Power Consumption

125 Watt

technology

12 nm

Date of Announcement

29.10.2019

v1.26

log 23. 07:02:01

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#4 return log +0.011s ... 0.044s

Our test system based on the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

A current AMD platform based on the Asus X570 ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi serves as the test system. The CPU (AMD Ryzen 9 5900X) offers good CPU performance, and we use an AIO (Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora 360 mm) for cooling. The 32 GB of RAM comes from Corsair and clocks at 4,000 MHz. We use the Acer Predator XB321HK as a monitor. It doesn't limit us due to its UHD capability. At this point, we would like to thank AMD for providing the test platform and Corsair for the RAM kit.

Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-4000 2x 16 GB

For the upcoming benchmarks and tests, we use the following system:

Lian Li O11 Dynamic
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Nvidia driver 460.79)
Asus X570 ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wi-Fi (BIOS 2402, default settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-4000)
Corsair RM1000X 1,000-watt power supply
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-4000 RAM kit 2x 16 GB
Corsair MP600 2 TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD
Crucial MX500 2 TB (for games)

Synthetic benchmarks

As you could already guess, our KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super ranks with a clear lead over the GeForce GTX 1650. However, a respectable gap to the GTX 1660 remains. At the same time, we also used an AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT for comparison, since it's part of the same performance class. The GTX 1650 Super is unable to outperform its AMD counterpart in most benchmarks. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether the result shown here will also be carried over to the gaming tests.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	15563 Points +33%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	14328 Points +23%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	13569 Points +16%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	11688 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	9203 Points -21%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	7179 Points +40%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	6843 Points +33%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	6247 Points +22%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	5135 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	4152 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	5958 Points +29%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	5422 Points +17%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	4891 Points +6%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	4632 Points
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	3538 Points -24%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	22914 Points +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	22323 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	6637 Points +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	6468 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	2721 Points +18%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	2305 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	3905 Points +5%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	3724 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	1597 Points +47%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	1087 Points

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	68.9 fps
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	63.6 fps -8%
Extreme Preset DX11
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	73 fps +2%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	71.9 fps

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	60.9 fps +13%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	54.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	51.2 fps 0%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	51.1 fps

SiSoft Sandra 2016
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	87.5 KOPT/s +42%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	61.8 KOPT/s
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	44.21 GB/s
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	42.08 GB/s -5%
Image Processing
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	1100 MPix/s +86%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	592 MPix/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	19723 Points +10%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	17849 Points

Gaming benchmarks

The Witcher 3 frame times (Ultra preset)

The Witcher 3 frame rates (Ultra preset)

In our gaming benchmarks, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super does well, and with a few exceptions, the graphics card masters almost all games in 1080p and maximum details. However, our test sample has to admit defeat against the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT. The performance gain compared with a GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly noticeable, but it also varies from game to game.

We used The Witcher 3 with the Ultra preset for the frame rates and frame times. It's noticeable here that the FPS can't be kept constant. Nevertheless, we have to say that it's not a noticeable performance drop. There are a few outliers in the recorded frame times now and then, although the smooth gameplay is not significantly affected by this.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	59.5 (53^min - 68^max) fps +36%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	58.3 fps +34%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	55.5 (50^min - 63^max) fps +27%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	43.6 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	40.4 (35^min - 46^max) fps -7%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	92 (83^min - 104^max) fps +23%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	88 (77^min - 107^max) fps +17%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	82 (73^min - 93^max) fps +9%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	75 (66^min - 87^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	59 (52^min - 68^max) fps -21%

Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	87 (69^min - 108^max) fps +23%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	80 (64^min - 96^max) fps +13%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	79 (62^min - 102^max) fps +11%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	71 (55^min - 86^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	58 (47^min - 70^max) fps -18%

Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	40.6 (36^min - 45^max) fps +31%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	34.9 (32^min - 40^max) fps +13%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	33.6 fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	31 fps

Crysis Remastered - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:SM
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	45.6 (33.6^min, 35.4^P0.1, 37.1^P1 - 67^max) fps +38%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	40.8 (32.2^min, 32.5^P0.1, 34^P1 - 58.7^max) fps +24%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	37.5 fps +14%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	33 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	27.6 (22.5^min, 22.7^P0.1, 23.3^P1 - 41.4^max) fps -16%

Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	53.1 (27.2^min, 41^P0.1, 43.1^P1 - 66.5^max) fps +15%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	50 (32.9^min, 38.2^P0.1, 42.8^P1 - 60.2^max) fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	46.3 (35.4^min, 36.8^P0.1, 39.2^P1 - 56.1^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	34.2 (25.1^min, 25.9^P0.1, 29^P1 - 41.2^max) fps -26%

Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War - 1920x1080 Highest Settings
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	57.2 (23^min, 25.4^P0.1, 33^P1 - 220^max) fps +55%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	52.5 (17.8^min, 27.2^P0.1, 39^P1 - 194^max) fps +42%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	49.6 fps +34%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	37 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	35.6 (26.2^min, 26.6^P0.1, 27.9^P1 - 62.8^max) fps -4%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	39.2 (6.1^min, 22^P0.1, 32.7^P1 - 135^max) fps +31%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	36.6 (6.64^min, 20.8^P0.1, 30.6^P1 - 183^max) fps +22%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	32.5 fps +8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	30 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	23.7 (6.33^min, 11.5^P0.1, 19.6^P1 - 58.8^max) fps -21%

F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	94.3 (78^min - 111^max) fps +26%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	89.8 (73^min - 106^max) fps +20%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	88 (64^min - 111^max) fps +17%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	75 (61^min - 91^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	60.3 (49^min - 72^max) fps -20%

Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	84.3 (75.2^P1) fps +26%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	80.2 fps +20%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	77.6 (69^P1) fps +16%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	67 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	52.7 (25.1^P1) fps -21%

Mafia Definitive Edition - 1920x1080 High Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	72.5 fps +25%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	64.9 fps +12%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	59.9 fps +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	58 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	45.2 fps -22%

Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	35.8 (21.71^min, 27.9^P1 - 52.79^max) fps +71%
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	31.4 (16.64^min, 21.23^P1 - 82^max) fps +50%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	29.4 (15.39^min, 18.11^P1 - 75.52^max) fps +41%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	21.2 (11.04^min, 15.31^P1 - 67.16^max) fps +1%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	20.9 (10.71^min, 12.73^P1 - 75.52^max) fps

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	57 (21^min - 116^max) fps +6%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	57 (38^min - 108^max) fps +6%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	54 fps 0%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	54 (35^min - 8339^max) fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	36 (23^min - 62^max) fps -33%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	80 fps +27%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	72 fps +14%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	65 fps +3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	63 fps

Yakuza Like a Dragon - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super	64.7 (28^min, 36^P0.1, 43.3^P1 - 121^max) fps +22%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660	59 (15.9^min, 31.2^P0.1, 39^P1 - 112^max) fps +11%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	55.3 fps +4%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	53 fps
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus	40.6 (24^min, 24.2^P0.1, 25.6^P1 - 83.3^max) fps -23%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	187	185	132	62.9	44.1	44
The Witcher 3 (2015)	206.8	130.7	80.3	43.6		29.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	182.8	166.7	156.8	141.1		78.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	250	147	86	67		30
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	126	67.8	47.3		34.2	19
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	149	138	106			87.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	156	89	81	75	52	27
Monster Hunter World (2018)	206	95	77	49	35	24
Strange Brigade (2018)	258	114	94.4	80.7	59.1	32.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	181	86	73	63	40	19
Battlefield V (2018)	121	72	58	57	42	24
Apex Legends (2019)	142	69	82	81	61	32
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	135	83	78	71	52	28
Metro Exodus (2019)	135	64.4	47	36.6	28.5	16.1
The Division 2 (2019)	104	83	66	49	33	16
Anno 1800 (2019)	165	110	60	31	21	13
Control (2019)	171	62	45		28	13
Borderlands 3 (2019)	161	81.5	52.8	39.8	23.3	7.87
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		84.2	73.7	65.6	44.3	21
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	129	71	45	14	11
Doom Eternal (2020)	235	115	96
F1 2020 (2020)	257	134	108	75	55	31
Death Stranding (2020)	116	84	68	67	46	22
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	125	74	62	54	39	9
Crysis Remastered (2020)	161	72	41	33	22	13
Serious Sam 4 (2020)	138.9	71.7	53.2	24.3	21.1	15.4
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)	120	61	58		38	20
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)	257.9	139	128.1	118.5	83.7	31.2
FIFA 21 (2020)	180.9	180.2	179.9	176.7	163.5	109.5
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	110	71.3	60.6	20.9	14.3	8.09
Dirt 5 (2020)	139	69.1	54	46.3	35.6	21
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	88	53	26	15	13	5
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020)	126	77	56	37	26	2
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	107	61.8	59.1	53	34.3	16.7
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)	116	82	67	59	48	34
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	78	44	36	30	18	7
Hitman 3 (2021)	185	105	87	79	51	25
Outriders (2021)	168	89.5	70.3	55.4	36.6	29.5
Resident Evil Village (2021)	234	100	90.1	77.7	50.6	20.9
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)	111			109	89.3	45.4
Days Gone (2021)	143	82.2	72	52.1	36.8	20
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021)	144	144	143		118	70.9
F1 2021 (2021)	308	157	127	80.9	57.7	32.1
Deathloop (2021)	105	62.8	49.6	3.03	24.9
New World (2021)	136	66.6	60.8	47.2	33.7	21.2
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)		91.9	86.4		84	54.8
Far Cry 6 (2021)	145	80	69	59	6
Back 4 Blood (2021)		128	113	102	63.7	30
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	98	67	67	65	31	15
Riders Republic (2021)	130	75	58	51	34
Call of Duty Vanguard (2021)	85.7	63.1	74.6	63.7	53.6	38.9
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	180	88	77	31	26	18
Battlefield 2042 (2021)	133	74.2	62.2	20.1	4.87
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	294	136	102	79.4	58.6	34.8
Halo Infinite (2021)		73.4	71.3	68.9	63.6	36.3
God of War (2022)	66.1	53.4	42.3	27.2	19.3	5.08
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	99	91	88	68	31	17
Dying Light 2 (2022)	69.1	34.8	28.2		18.5	8.62
GRID Legends (2022)	170	116	96	66	50	25
Elden Ring (2022)	58.9	52.2	45	37.2	27.6	14.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	67.4	53.3	41.1	32.1	18.5	3.3
Elex 2 (2022)	60.9	54.8	47.1		25.9	9.86
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	73.3	76.8	75.8	75.2	45.1	15.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	99.2	79.9	49.8	35.2	22.1	10.8
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022)	193.7	104.3	100.8	95.8	53.1	20.9

Emissions of the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650

If you decide to buy a GeForce GTX 1650 Super, you will probably mainly look at the graphics card's power consumption. The model is quite efficient at 100 watts, despite the fact that the non-Super model only requires 75 watts. This is also reflected in our measurement results. Our test system only needs 87 watts in idle usage. In the stress test, this value increases to 229 watts, which is, however, significantly lower compared to the test system with the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

Power consumption while gaming is even a bit higher at 241 watts, but it can still be classified as low in comparison. In contrast to the GeForce GTX 1650, power consumption is almost 40 watts higher. Nevertheless, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super is an energy-efficient graphics card for small systems. There's no cause for concern in terms of temperatures, as our test sample only reached 70 °C (~158 °F) in the stress test. However, the cooling unit still deserves criticism. It's audible under load, and the KFA2 model unfortunately does not have a fan-stop mode for 2D use.

Test system power consumption (when gaming - The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)

Power Consumption
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor)
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 84.76 W)	260.4 (255^min - 277^max) Watt * -8%
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 83.93 W)	250.2 (246^min - 262^max) Watt * -4%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)	248.6 (240^min - 259^max) Watt * -3%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 86.5 W)	240.7 (237^min - 247^max) Watt *
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)	202.9 (202^min - 204^max) Watt * +16%
1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 83.93 W)	259.1 (242^min - 295^max) Watt * -13%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)	247.8 (242^min - 282^max) Watt * -8%
KFA 2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 84.76 W)	247.6 (241^min - 322^max) Watt * -8%
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (Idle: 86.5 W)	228.7 (223^min - 271^max) Watt *
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX One Click Plus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)	200.4 (193^min - 230^max) Watt * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Verdict - Small, compact, and energy-efficient

In review: The KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super is an energy-efficient graphics card that is suitable for the home living room PC. With the TU116 graphics chip, the GTX 1650 Super offers the advantages of the GTX 1660 series when it comes to the NVENC video encoding. In terms of price, this graphics card is currently very difficult to categorize, since the problematic availability of graphics cards has now also reached the entry-level models, and even here, we can already see significantly increasing prices. For example, prices starting at 160 Euros (~$192) can be found on the second-hand market.

In terms of pure performance, the GeForce GTX 1650 Super ranks directly behind a GeForce GTX 1660. The VRAM of 4 GB is a bit tight if you're looking for something for the long term. At the moment, however, many games can be played smoothly in 1080p even with this graphics card without having to sacrifice details. Only a few games require a reduction in details in order to achieve smooth frame rates.

If you're looking for a small and yet powerful graphics card, there's currently no way around the GeForce GTX 1650 Super.

Objectively speaking, the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super is a solid graphics card for the entry level. However, the built-in cooling system deserves some criticism. A fan-stop mode for 2D use would be appreciated, and a lower noise level in 3D applications would make the graphics card more attractive.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

5.6 pt (17%)

AMD Radeon HD 8180

0.06605 -99%

...

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

4.81 -14%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)

5.13 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

5.27 -5%

AMD Radeon R9 290X

5.34 -4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

5.38 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI

5.38 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

5.45 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

5.45 -2%

AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)

5.55 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

5.57

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

5.57 0%

5.58 0%

5.59 0%

5.64 1%

5.72 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

5.89 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

5.91 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)

5.94 7%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

5.99 8%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

33.3 498%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score

min: 5099 avg: 5168 median: 5184 (15%) max: 5221 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5099
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5184
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5221

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

min: 4632 avg: 4639 median: 4633 (12%) max: 4651 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4632
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4633
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	4651

Qualcomm Adreno 618

112 -98%

...

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)

4094 -12%

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

4155 -10%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

4194 -10%

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

4209 -9%

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU

4256 -8%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

4372 -6%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4511 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

4517 -3%

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

4546 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

4639

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

4661 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

4687 1%

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

4712 2%

AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)

4872 5%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

4932 6%

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

4967 7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

5058 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

5089 10%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

5132 11%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

36485 686%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

min: 450349 avg: 590850 median: 657142 (74%) max: 665060 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	450349
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	657142
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	665060

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics

min: 221403 avg: 238251 median: 245396 (31%) max: 247955 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	221403
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	245396
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	247955

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 44256 avg: 48694 median: 50706 (54%) max: 51119 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	44256
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	50706
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	51119

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 63896 avg: 67340 median: 68578 (18%) max: 69545 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	63896
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	68578
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	69545

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 11050 avg: 11422 median: 11544 (20%) max: 11671 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11050
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11544
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11671

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 11688 avg: 12104 median: 12225 (14%) max: 12400 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	11688
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	12225
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	12400

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min: 278896 avg: 303326 median: 312787 (38%) max: 318296 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	278896
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	312787
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	318296

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid

40490 Points (38%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	40490

3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score

56328 Points (22%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	56328

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score

min: 17833 avg: 18723 median: 18949 (26%) max: 19387 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	17833
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18949
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	19387

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU

min: 17849 avg: 18105 median: 18218 (16%) max: 18247 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	17849
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18218
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	18247

AMD Radeon HD 6250

171.8 -99%

...

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

17543 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

17562 -3%

AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

17625 -3%

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU

17690 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

17711 -2%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

17889 -1%

AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)

17919 -1%

AMD Radeon R9 390X

17944 -1%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

18037 0%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

18105

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)

18967 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

19016 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI

19109 6%

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)

19274 6%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

19467 8%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

19503 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

19881 10%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

20096 11%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

20096 11%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

106023 486%

100%

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total

min: 57390 avg: 62121 median: 64463 (19%) max: 64511 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	57390
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	64463
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	64511

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX

min: 52466 avg: 55647 median: 57106 (32%) max: 57368 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	52466
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	57106
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	57368

ATI Radeon HD 3200

62 -100%

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI

51344 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

51396 -8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

52230 -6%

AMD Radeon RX 6500M

52733 -5%

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

52917 -5%

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU

53510 -4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

54416 -2%

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

54830 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

55279 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

55647

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

57962 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)

58491 5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

58633 5%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

58792 6%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)

60089 8%

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)

60334 8%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

60439 9%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)

60862 9%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)

61609 11%

...

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

170928 207%

100%

3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard

min: 84609 avg: 86965 median: 86964.5 (95%) max: 89320 Points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	84609
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	89320

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

133.4 -100%

...

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

80878 -7%

AMD Radeon RX 7600

81832 -6%

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

82041 -6%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G

85110 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

85241 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

85279 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

85372 -2%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

85804 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)

85875 -1%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)

86965

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

86975 0%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super

87172 0%

100%

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +

3DMark 06

min: 46823 avg: 59017 median: 64150 (84%) max: 66078 Points

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	46823
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	64150
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	66078

Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX

min: 53.7 avg: 54.3 median: 54.1 (18%) max: 55 fps

+ 3 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7900X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	53.7
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	54.1
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	55

SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

min: 50.2 avg: 58.3 median: 58.3 (14%) max: 66.3 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	50.2
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	66.3

specvp12 snx-02 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

min: 7.98 avg: 8.4 median: 8.4 (1%) max: 8.89 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	7.98
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	8.89

specvp12 showcase-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

min: 53 avg: 54.8 median: 54.8 (12%) max: 56.5 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	53
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	56.5

specvp12 mediacal-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

min: 25.53 avg: 29.5 median: 29.5 (8%) max: 33.5 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	25.53
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	33.5

specvp12 maya-04 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

min: 110 avg: 113 median: 113 (31%) max: 116 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	110
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	116

specvp12 energy-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

min: 5.17 avg: 5.4 median: 5.4 (5%) max: 5.59 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5.17
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 7950X 230 W / 170 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	5.59

specvp12 creo-01 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

min: 37.62 avg: 40.2 median: 40.2 (16%) max: 42.8 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 catia-04 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

min: 53 avg: 55.2 median: 55.2 (9%) max: 57.3 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp12 3dsmax-05 +

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

min: 119 avg: 127 median: 127 (22%) max: 135 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04

min: 67.8 avg: 83.2 median: 83.2 (22%) max: 98.5 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 snx-03 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03

min: 14.26 avg: 15.1 median: 15.1 (2%) max: 16 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 showcase-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02

min: 53.2 avg: 54.9 median: 54.9 (12%) max: 56.6 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 medical-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02

min: 35.4 avg: 35.5 median: 35.5 (7%) max: 35.6 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 maya-05 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05

min: 161 avg: 164 median: 164 (19%) max: 167 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 energy-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02

min: 7.61 avg: 7.6 median: 7.6 (2%) max: 7.64 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 creo-02 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02

min: 114 avg: 117 median: 117 (17%) max: 120 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 catia-05 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05

min: 76.3 avg: 77.9 median: 77.9 (9%) max: 79.4 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp13 3dsmax-06 +

SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06

min: 119 avg: 127 median: 127 (22%) max: 135 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k

26.2 fps (8%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 snx-04 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k

min: 10.64 avg: 11.1 median: 11.1 (1%) max: 11.6 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 medical-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k

min: 5.29 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (6%) max: 6.58 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 maya-06 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k

min: 85.6 avg: 87 median: 87 (14%) max: 88.4 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 energy-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k

11 fps (2%)

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 creo-03 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k

min: 43.66 avg: 45 median: 45 (21%) max: 46.4 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 catia-06 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k

min: 13.3 avg: 13.3 median: 13.3 (9%) max: 13.37 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +

SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k

min: 27.5 avg: 28.4 median: 28.4 (12%) max: 29.3 fps

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU

min: 1405 avg: 1411 median: 1410.5 (6%) max: 1416 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU

min: 2972 avg: 2994 median: 2993.5 (5%) max: 3015 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result

min: 9510 avg: 9521 median: 9521 (10%) max: 9532 points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 225 avg: 226.9 median: 226.9 (32%) max: 228.7 Watt

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

show legend

Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 220 avg: 230.4 median: 230.4 (32%) max: 240.7 Watt

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

show legend

Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor

0.2 fps per Watt (15%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark

1740 MHz (69%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26

log 23. 07:02:02

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 getting avg benchmarks for device 10646 +0.018s ... 0.019s

#4 got single benchmarks 10646 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.836s ... 0.871s

#7 return log +0s ... 0.871s

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024

31 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

18.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

42.8

Horizon Forbidden West

2024

48.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

36.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

22.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

15.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

13 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Very Low Preset 1280x720

92.1

48.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

37.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

29.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

29 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

112.1

Enshrouded

2024

35.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

30.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20.5 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

17.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Additional Benchmarks

Max. Performance 1280x720

63.7

Palworld

2024

70.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

53.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

51.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

47.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

11.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Very Low Preset 1280x720

120.1

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024

359 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

296 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

282 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

169.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

83 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Ready or Not

2023

118.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

100.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

94.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

49 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

5.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

The Finals

2023

142.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

98.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

85.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

61.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

35.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

11.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

246

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023

40 fps + Compare

36 fps + Compare

29 fps + Compare

21 fps + Compare

16 fps + Compare

5 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset TAA 1280x720

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023

66 fps + Compare

59 fps + Compare

44 fps + Compare

34 fps + Compare

23 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Minimum Preset 1280x720

113

EA Sports WRC

2023

71.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

55.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

31.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

27.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

10.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720

161.5

Alan Wake 2

2023

33.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

28.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

25.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

16.5 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

57.4

2023

61.2 fps + Compare

48.3 fps + Compare

39 fps + Compare

35.2 fps + Compare

20.2 fps + Compare

3.4 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720

95.9

Steam Deck 1280x720

100.5

Ultra Preset (FSR on) 1920x1080

Lies of P

2023

94.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

81.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

69.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

61 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

35.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

161.5

Starfield

2023

24 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

13 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

10 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

6.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

46.2

Armored Core 6

2023

94.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

75.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

68.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

28.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

22.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

12.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

117.9

35.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

15.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

79.2

Resident Evil 4 Remake

2023

71.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

46.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

39.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

17.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

14.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

9.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720

120.5

Company of Heroes 3

2023

62.8 fps + Compare

52.8 fps + Compare

46.9 fps + Compare

42.7 fps + Compare

30.5 fps + Compare

18.1 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Minimum Settings 1280x720

109.2

Sons of the Forest

2023

57.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

41.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

39.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

39 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

14.5 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Ultra Low Preset 1280x720

88.9

Atomic Heart

2023

98.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

73.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

42.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

33.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

24 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

10.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

160.1

Returnal

2023

52 fps + Compare

48 fps + Compare

43 fps + Compare

30 fps + Compare

21 fps + Compare

10 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

Hogwarts Legacy

2023

72.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

54.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

41.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

33.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

22.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

6.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720

120.2

2022

50.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

45 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

28.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26.5 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

13.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

73.9

A Plague Tale Requiem

2022

60.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

44.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

32.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

23.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

14.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

6.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

84.7

FIFA 23

2022

172.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

160.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

105 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

103.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

37.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

7.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Rendering Quality 1280x720

276

The Quarry

2022

79 80.1 ~ 80 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

55.7 56.5 ~ 56 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

44.6 58.2 ~ 51 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

23.8 33.1 ~ 28 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

11.7 17.6 ~ 15 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

4.2 4.3 ~ 4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

119.5

F1 22

2022

161.6 173.4 ~ 168 fps + Compare

142.8 154.1 ~ 148 fps + Compare

103 107.9 ~ 105 fps + Compare

72.1 81.4 ~ 77 fps + Compare

51 55.9 ~ 53 fps + Compare

25.5 28.4 ~ 27 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720

285

300

Vampire Bloodhunt

2022

193.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

104.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

100.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

95.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

53.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

322

2022

60.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

54.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

47.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

25.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

9.9 36.2 ~ 23 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low / Off 1280x720

80.6

GRID Legends

2022

170 172.6 202 ~ 182 fps + Compare

116 126.3 147.3 ~ 130 fps + Compare

96 99.3 113.1 ~ 103 fps + Compare

66 71.8 78 ~ 72 fps + Compare

50 54.9 56.6 ~ 54 fps + Compare

25 26.7 30.7 ~ 27 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

230

282

Elden Ring

2022

58.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

52.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

45 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

37.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

27.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

14.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Dying Light 2

2022

69.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

34.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

28.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

18.5 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

8.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Quality 1280x720

96.7

Rainbow Six Extraction

2022

99 fps + Compare

91 fps + Compare

88 fps + Compare

68 fps + Compare

31 fps + Compare

17 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720

173

God of War

2022

66.1 76.4 76.6 ~ 73 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

53.4 63.2 63.3 ~ 60 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

42.3 46.3 48.3 ~ 46 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

27.2 27.6 28.4 ~ 28 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

19.3 20.8 21.4 ~ 21 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

5.1 8.1 8.4 ~ 7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1280x720

101

113.4

Halo Infinite

2021

73.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

71.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

68.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

63.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

36.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

84.9

Farming Simulator 22

2021

294 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

136 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

102 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

79.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

58.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

34.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

245

Battlefield 2042

2021

133 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

74.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

62.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

4.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

86.7

Forza Horizon 5

2021

180 194 195 ~ 190 fps + Compare

88 93 97 ~ 93 fps + Compare

77 82 85 ~ 81 fps + Compare

30 31 32 ~ 31 fps + Compare

26 27 27 ~ 27 fps + Compare

18 18 19 ~ 18 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

110

119

Call of Duty Vanguard

2021

85.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

63.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

74.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

63.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

53.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

38.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

69.7

Riders Republic

2021

130 fps + Compare

75 fps + Compare

58 fps + Compare

51 fps + Compare

34 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

2021

91.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

86.4 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

84 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

54.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

New World

2021

136 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

66.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

60.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

47.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

33.7 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

21.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Video Quality 1920x1080

84.5

Deathloop

2021

105 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

62.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

49.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

3 36.7 ~ 20 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

24.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

F1 2021

2021

308 355 363 ~ 342 fps + Compare

157 168.7 172.7 ~ 166 fps + Compare

127 134.8 138 ~ 133 fps + Compare

78.3 80.2 80.9 ~ 80 fps + Compare

57.7 59.1 60 ~ 59 fps + Compare

32.1 32.8 32.8 ~ 33 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Monster Hunter Stories 2

2021

144 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

143 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

118 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

70.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

144

Days Gone

2021

143 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

82.2 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

72 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

52.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

36.8 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

100

79 fps + Compare

51 fps + Compare

25 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.0

2020

78 fps + Compare

44 fps + Compare

36 fps + Compare

30 fps + Compare

18 fps + Compare

7 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset 1920x1080

Immortals Fenyx Rising

2020

116 fps + Compare

82 fps + Compare

67 fps + Compare

59 fps + Compare

48 fps + Compare

34 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Yakuza Like a Dragon

2020

107 fps + Compare

61.8 fps + Compare

59.1 fps + Compare

53 fps + Compare

34.3 fps + Compare

16.7 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War

2020

126 fps + Compare

77 fps + Compare

56 fps + Compare

37 fps + Compare

26 fps + Compare

2 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Assassin´s Creed Valhalla

2020

88 fps + Compare

53 fps + Compare

26 fps + Compare

15 fps + Compare

13 fps + Compare

5 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Dirt 5

2020

139 fps + Compare

69.1 fps + Compare

54 fps + Compare

46.3 fps + Compare

35.6 fps + Compare

21 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Watch Dogs Legion

2020

110 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

71.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

60.6 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

20.9 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

14.3 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

8.1 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

FIFA 21

2020

180.9 fps + Compare

180.2 fps + Compare

179.9 fps + Compare

176.7 fps + Compare

163.5 fps + Compare

109.5 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Star Wars Squadrons

2020

257.9 fps + Compare

139 fps + Compare

128.1 fps + Compare

118.5 fps + Compare

83.7 fps + Compare

31.2 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

161 207 215 ~ 194 fps + Compare

81.5 89.5 90.8 ~ 87 fps + Compare

52.8 57.7 58.2 ~ 56 fps + Compare

39.8 43.4 43.7 ~ 42 fps + Compare

23.3 29.5 29.9 ~ 28 fps + Compare

7.9 11.8 11.8 ~ 10 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080

137.3

Control

2019

171 fps + Compare

62 fps + Compare

45 fps + Compare

28 fps + Compare

13 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Anno 1800

2019

165 fps + Compare

110 fps + Compare

60 fps + Compare

31 fps + Compare

21 fps + Compare

13 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

The Division 2

2019

104 fps + Compare

83 fps + Compare

66 fps + Compare

49 fps + Compare

33 fps + Compare

16 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

135 159 162 ~ 152 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

83 89 91 ~ 88 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

78 83 85 ~ 82 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

71 76 78 ~ 75 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

52 55 56 ~ 54 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

26 28 28 ~ 27 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Metro Exodus

2019

135 141.8 150.7 ~ 143 fps + Compare

64.4 66.7 68.8 ~ 67 fps + Compare

47 48.6 49.9 ~ 49 fps + Compare

36.6 38 38.8 ~ 38 fps + Compare

28.5 29.2 29.8 ~ 29 fps + Compare

13.8 16.1 16.1 ~ 15 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Apex Legends

2019

142 fps + Compare

69 fps + Compare

82 fps + Compare

81 fps + Compare

61 fps + Compare

32 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Battlefield V

2018

121 fps + Compare

72 fps + Compare

58 fps + Compare

57 fps + Compare

42 fps + Compare

24 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

181 216 220 ~ 206 fps + Compare

85.4 85.4 86 ~ 86 fps + Compare

71.7 71.9 73 ~ 72 fps + Compare

58.9 61.9 63 ~ 61 fps + Compare

38.9 39.8 40 ~ 40 fps + Compare

19 19.1 19.3 ~ 19 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Lowest Preset 1920x1080

145.3

Strange Brigade

2018

258 303 313 ~ 291 fps + Compare

114 121.2 121.7 ~ 119 fps + Compare

94.4 100.8 102.4 ~ 99 fps + Compare

80.7 83.1 84.2 ~ 83 fps + Compare

59.1 59.5 59.9 ~ 60 fps + Compare

29.5 30.4 32.9 ~ 31 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Monster Hunter World

2018

206 fps + Compare

95 fps + Compare

77 fps + Compare

49 fps + Compare

35 fps + Compare

24 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Far Cry 5

2018

156 180 185 ~ 174 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

89 93 95 ~ 92 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

81 86 87 ~ 85 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

75 79 81 ~ 78 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

52 54 54 ~ 53 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

24 24 27 ~ 25 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset TAA 1920x1080

108

X-Plane 11.11

2018

149 224 226 ~ 200 fps + Compare

138 196.4 196.8 ~ 177 fps + Compare

106 150.6 156.9 ~ 138 fps + Compare

87.8 95.4 95.9 ~ 93 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018

126 142.1 145.5 ~ 138 fps + Compare

67.8 72.6 73.3 ~ 71 fps + Compare

47.3 50.6 51.5 ~ 50 fps + Compare

34.2 35.9 36.7 ~ 36 fps + Compare

19 19.1 20 ~ 19 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016

250 fps + Compare

147 fps + Compare

86 fps + Compare

67 fps + Compare

30 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Dota 2 Reborn

2015

182.8 293.4 303.8 ~ 260 fps + Compare

166.7 258.4 269.8 ~ 232 fps + Compare

156.8 209.3 210.4 ~ 192 fps + Compare

141.1 190.8 193.8 ~ 175 fps + Compare

78.3 79.5 79.8 ~ 79 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

The Witcher 3

2015

206.8 270 285 ~ 254 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

130.7 171.4 177.4 ~ 160 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

80.3 90.3 95.9 ~ 89 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

43.6 49.5 54.2 ~ 49 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

29.5 31.8 32.9 ~ 31 fps + Compare + 📈 Graph

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160

22.3

Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080

111.2

GTA V

2015

185 187 187.5 188.3 ~ 187 fps + Compare

185 187.5 187.8 ~ 187 fps + Compare

132 140.8 143.2 ~ 139 fps + Compare

62.9 64.9 65.7 ~ 65 fps + Compare

44.1 45.3 46 ~ 45 fps + Compare

44 45 45.2 ~ 45 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

Additional Benchmarks

Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160

20.6

16.3

14.4

Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080

185

187.5

188.1

Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080

187

187.5

187.9

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
Dragon's Dogma 2	31		26.3		18.4
Horizon Forbidden West	48.4	36.7	22.7	15.3	13
Alone in the Dark	135.4	104.3	86.2	22
Last Epoch	128.6	99.2	83.6	51.6	32.4	14.4
Skull & Bones	67	59	45	39	27	13
Helldivers 2	48.8	37.4	29.7	29	20.8
Enshrouded	35.1	30.7	20.5	17.1
Palworld	70.9	53.4	51.3	47.4	26	11.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown		359	296	282	169.8	83
Ready or Not	118.1	100.8	94.7	49	26.8	5.6
The Finals	142.1	98.9	85.9	61.3	35.9	11.1
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora	40	36	29	21	16	5
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023	66	59	44	34	23
EA Sports WRC	71.3	55.3	31.4	27.4	10.7
Alan Wake 2	33.9	28.3	25.7		16.5
Lords of the Fallen	45.6	34.4	24.1	15.8	8.7
Total War Pharaoh	201.9	136.5	75.4	59.5	38.7	19.2
Assassin's Creed Mirage	68	62	51	35	28	14
EA Sports FC 24	157.3	144	114.6	103.5	65.8	7.5
Counter-Strike 2	248	201	117.2	74.3	51.8	19.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty	61.2	48.3	39	35.2	20.2	3.36
Lies of P	94.3	81.8	69.7	61	35.6	9
Starfield	24	20	13	10	6.1
Armored Core 6	94.2	75.8	68.3	28.7	22.8	12.3
Immortals of Aveum	21.6		15.5
Atlas Fallen	73.5	68.5	63.2	44	29.9	13
Baldur's Gate 3	61.8	49.1	40.1	39.3	26.2	3.5
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart	45	38.4	29.5	22.8	12.2	6.74
F1 23	162.7	140	93.4	42.9	29	14.3
Diablo 4	124.8	108.4	97.1	82.1	55.3	27.2
Star Wars Jedi Survivor	43.6	34.7	32.9	28.8	15.4	5.15
Dead Island 2	142.2	119.4	64.4	54.2	39.2	10.3
The Last of Us	53.1	40.8	35.7	26.7	15.9
Resident Evil 4 Remake	71.4	46.4	39.6	17.8	14.7	9.21
Company of Heroes 3	62.8	52.8	46.9	42.7	30.5	18.1
Sons of the Forest	57.8	41.7	39.3	39	26.7	14.5
Atomic Heart	98.9	73.4	42.4	33.2	24	10.1
Returnal	52	48	43	30	21	10
Hogwarts Legacy	72.4	54.3	41.4	33.4	22.4	6.81
Dead Space Remake	46.5	41.9	32.9	30.3	5.23
The Witcher 3 v4.00	112.6	83.9	70.4	56.1	37.2	13.5
High On Life	139.4	76.9	60.1	50.7	31.3	7.78
The Callisto Protocol	85.4	58.1	34.3	31.9	17.5	7.9
Need for Speed Unbound	90.2	68.4	50.7	35.4	23.7	11.4
Spider-Man Miles Morales	75.8	65.8	54.9	43.4	27.6	15.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022	79	46	48	42	29	17
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection	50.9	45	28.7	26.5	13.2
A Plague Tale Requiem	60.4	44.7	32.2	23.9	14.1	6.84
FIFA 23	172.2	160.4	105	103.2	37.2	7.91
The Quarry	80	56	51	28	15	4
F1 22	168	148	105	77	53	27
Vampire Bloodhunt	193.7	104.3	100.8	95.8	53.1	20.9
Ghostwire Tokyo	73.3	76.8	75.8	75.2	45.1	15.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands	105	81	52	34	22	10
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6	63	50	40	34	20	3
Elex 2	60.9	54.8	47.1		25.9	23
GRID Legends	182	130	103	72	54	27
Elden Ring	58.9	52.2	45	37.2	27.6	14.4
Dying Light 2	69.1	34.8	28.2		18.5	8.62
Rainbow Six Extraction	99	91	88	68	31	17
God of War	73	60	46	28	21	7
Halo Infinite		73.4	71.3	68.9	63.6	36.3
Farming Simulator 22	294	136	102	79.4	58.6	34.8
Battlefield 2042	133	74.2	62.2	20.1	4.87
Forza Horizon 5	190	93	81	31	27	18
Call of Duty Vanguard	85.7	63.1	74.6	63.7	53.6	38.9
Riders Republic	130	75	58	51	34
Guardians of the Galaxy	98	67	67	65	31	15
Back 4 Blood		128	113	102	63.7	30
Far Cry 6	148	55	51	32	6
Alan Wake Remastered		91.9	86.4		84	54.8
New World	136	66.6	60.8	47.2	33.7	21.2
Deathloop	105	62.8	49.6	20	24.9
F1 2021	342	166	133	80	59	33
Monster Hunter Stories 2	144	144	143		118	70.9
Days Gone	143	82.2	72	52.1	36.8	20
Mass Effect Legendary Edition	111			109	89.3	45.4
Resident Evil Village	234	100	90.1	77.7	50.6	20.9
Outriders	168	89.5	70.3	55.4	36.6	29.5
Hitman 3	185	105	87	79	51	25
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0	78	44	36	30	18	7
Immortals Fenyx Rising	116	82	67	59	48	34
Yakuza Like a Dragon	107	61.8	59.1	53	34.3	16.7
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War	126	77	56	37	26	2
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla	88	53	26	15	13	5
Dirt 5	139	69.1	54	46.3	35.6	21
Watch Dogs Legion	110	71.3	60.6	20.9	14.3	8.09
FIFA 21	180.9	180.2	179.9	176.7	163.5	109.5
Star Wars Squadrons	257.9	139	128.1	118.5	83.7	31.2
Mafia Definitive Edition	120	61	58		38	20
Serious Sam 4	138.9	71.7	53.2	24.3	21.1	15.4
Crysis Remastered	161	72	41	33	22	13
Horizon Zero Dawn	125	74	62	54	39	9
Death Stranding	116	84	68	67	46	22
F1 2020	303	152	119	81	59	32
Doom Eternal	235	115	96
Red Dead Redemption 2	129	71	45	14	11
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order		84.2	73.7	65.6	44.3	21
Borderlands 3	194	87	56	42	28	10
Control	171	62	45		28	13
Anno 1800	165	110	60	31	21	13
The Division 2	104	83	66	49	33	16
Far Cry New Dawn	152	88	82	75	54	27
Metro Exodus	143	67	49	38	29	15
Apex Legends	142	69	82	81	61	32
Battlefield V	121	72	58	57	42	24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	206	86	72	61	40	19
Strange Brigade	291	119	99	83	60	31
Monster Hunter World	206	95	77	49	35	24
Far Cry 5	174	92	85	78	53	25
X-Plane 11.11	200	177	138			93
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark	138	71	50		36	19
Rise of the Tomb Raider	250	147	86	67		30
Dota 2 Reborn	260	232	192	175		79
The Witcher 3	254	160	89	49		31
GTA V	187	187	139	65	45	45
< 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps	2 15 40 54	2 32 59 20	13 43 51 8	23 47 31 3	55 42 9 2	76 15 5

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26

log 23. 07:02:08

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 0.002s

#4 Got 864 rows for game benchmarks. +0.072s ... 0.074s

#5 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#6 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.062s ... 0.136s

#7 benchmarks composed for output. +5.84s ... 5.977s

#8 return log +0.007s ... 5.984s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) graphics card review

With the GeForce GTX 1650 Super, there's an inexpensive Turing GPU from Nvidia that is equipped with the TU116 graphics chip. The power consumption is 100 watts...
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) | 32.00"

Editor of the original article: Sebastian Bade - Senior Tech Writer - 499 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

I was already interested in technology from an early age, and I was able to study for my dream job as an IT Systems Electronics Engineer. Subsequently, I started 12 years of military service, during which I learned a lot about technology and constantly kept my knowledge up to date with the latest developments. As I like to share my knowledge, I found Notebookcheck was a very good opportunity for this. In addition, I also work a lot with water cooling and network security.

contact me via: Facebook, nbc.basti, Xing

Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

I've been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of laptop graphics cards
List of all mobile graphics cards with brief information sorted by performance

» Mobile graphics cards - Benchmark list
Benchmark list that can be sorted and filtered

» Gaming list
Computer games on laptop graphics cards

Class 1

RTX 6000 Ada Generation Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Desktop

Radeon RX 7900 XTX Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Desktop

Radeon RX 7900 XT Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Desktop

Radeon RX 7900 GRE Desktop

Radeon RX 6950 XT Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Desktop

Radeon RX 7800 XT Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Desktop

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop

Radeon RX 6900 XT Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop

Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop

Radeon RX 6800 XT Desktop

Radeon RX 6800 Desktop

Radeon RX 7700 XT Desktop

NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Desktop

Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop

Arc A770

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Desktop

Radeon RX 7600 Desktop

GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop

Radeon RX 6600 XT Desktop

GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Arc A750

Arc A580

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Desktop

Titan X Pascal Desktop

GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon VII Desktop

Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 6600 Desktop

Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop

RX Vega 64 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) Desktop

RX Vega 56 Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop

Pro Vega 56 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 6500 XT Desktop

Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GTX 980 Ti Desktop

GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon R9 Fury Desktop

Radeon R9 Nano Desktop

GeForce GTX 980 Desktop

Radeon RX 590 Desktop

Radeon RX 580 Desktop

Radeon R9 390X Desktop

GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon RX 570 Desktop

Radeon RX 480 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) Desktop

Arc A380

GeForce GTX 970 Desktop

Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) Desktop

Class 3

Radeon R9 380 Desktop

GeForce GTX 960 Desktop

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) Desktop

Radeon R7 370 Desktop

GeForce GTX 950 Desktop

T600

Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) Desktop

GeForce GT 710 Desktop

UHD Graphics 32EUs

UHD Graphics 750

FirePro W4100 Desktop

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

FirePro W2100 Desktop

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) graphics card review

Sebastian Bade, 2021-02- 3 (Update: 2021-02- 3)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC)	i9-14900K 253 W / 253 W	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 100 W 1740 / 1500 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	225
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX One Click OC	R9 5900X	GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1530 / 6000 MHz 4 GB	32 GB	228.7