Lenovo Thinkpad X61s
Average of 5 scores (from 11 reviews)
Reviews for the Lenovo Thinkpad X61s
Source: Tom's Guide
The Thinkpad thinkpad X61s came in late, but its performance was convincing. It closes the gap between notebooks with ULV CPUs and the performance flyer Samsung P200-Pro. It succeeds in walking the tightrope between weight and performance, offering more performance than the ULV group, but it is lighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lighter than Samsung and HP while offering similar battery life.
Leistung gut, Mobilität zufriedenstellend
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2008
Rating: performance: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Digital Trends
Lenovo is known for making some of the best business notebooks money can buy, and the ThinkPad X61s continues this proud tradition. This sub-4lb. notebook is packed to the gills with next-gen technology and offers surprisingly blazing performance, impressive battery life and loads of useful features. Though its thin-and-light stature is not for everyone, and the optional dock is required for full functionality, the X61s is a road warrior's dream come true. Thin-and-light notebooks have always been about compromise, due to their small size, but Lenovo has done a commendable job of getting around those compromises by offering the docking station and extra batteries. This is a notebook that does not compromise on performance one iota, as it’s very fast, which is surprising to see (and feel) on a notebook of this size.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
7.5 von 10, Leistung sehr gut, Display schlecht, Mobilität gut, Ausstattung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2007
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 90% performance: 90% features: 80% display: 40% mobility: 80%
The X61 is Lenovo's Santa Rosa update to their renowned ThinkPad X series of ultraportable laptops. The X series is synonymous with usability and toughness while on the go. There are two versions of the ThinkPad X61: the X61 and the X61s. The notebooks are almost the same, save for the CPUs. The X61 uses the full power Core 2 Duos while the X61s variant uses the low power versions of the Core 2 Duo. In general, the X61 will offer a bit better performance while the X61s will have better battery life. This review will focus on the low power X61s. The X61s has been a nice contrast to my R60. I like my R60 a lot, but at times it seems heavy to me. When I get my next notebook, I might go with something smaller like this X61. After having spent some time with the X61s, I can see why people have such enthusiasm for the X series and why it is often so well reviewed. If you are a person who needs a lot of mobility or just want a small notebook, the X61s makes a compelling argument.
umfangreicher Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar
Leistung gut, Mobilität gut, Display gut, Verarbeitung mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/02/2007
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Laptop Mag
One of our favorite ultraportables just got a power boost. Like its predecessors, the ThinkPad X61s ($2,228 as configured) boasts a rock-solid design (view our photo gallery), a best-in-class keyboard, and enough security features to make the most seasoned hacker ponder retirement. Striking a very good balance between performance and battery life, the X61s is a highly recommended ultralight business notebook.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4 von 5, Leistung mäßig, Display gut, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
The good: Solid performance, thanks to the latest Core 2 Duo processor; extremely portable design; excellent keyboard; fingerprint reader; easy-to-use ThinkVantage utility; lengthy battery life with extended battery. The bad: Lacks built-in optical drive; standard-aspect display feels outdated. The bottom line: The ThinkPad X61s provides excellent dual-core performance in a lightweight, compact package that's still comfortable to use.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
(von 10): 8, Leistung 9, Ausstattung 8, Mobilität 8
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/08/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% features: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 11-12/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/18/2008
Rating: performance: 70% display: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2008
Rating: performance: 75% features: 90% display: 40% mobility: 40% workmanship: 80%
Source: Handys - 6/07
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/07/2007
Rating: performance: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: mobile Zeit - 6/07
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/02/2007
Rating: features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Connect - 10/07
Comparison, , Medium, Date: 10/01/2007
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 90% features: 83% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 69%
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
L7500: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for very big tablets, subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 11-13 inch display-diagonal.
Lenovo: Lenovo ( "Le" as in the English word legend and "novo" (Latin) for new) was founded in 1984 as a Chinese computer trading company. From 2004, the company has been the largest laptop manufacturer in China and got the fourth largest manufacturer worldwide after the acquisition of IBM's PC division in 2005. In addition to desktops and notebooks, the company also produces monitors, projectors, servers, etc.
In 2011, Medion AG, a European computer hardware manufacturer, owned the majority of the company. In 2014, Lenovo took over Motorola Mobility, which gave them a boost in the smartphone market.
From 2014 to 2016 Lenovo's market share in the global notebook market was 20-21%, ranking second behind HP. However, the distance decreased gradually. In the smartphone market, Lenovo did not belong to the Top 5 global manufacturers in 2016.
78.8%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.