Notebookcheck Logo

Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

Now with integrated benchmark, but still very demanding. More than a year after the official PC release, a comprehensive update for Cyberpunk 2077 is here with patch 1.5. Let's analyze the graphics requirements and performance of the game again.
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5

Technology

Apart from a few new features (e.g. ray-traced local shadows), hardly anything has changed graphically compared to previous patches. But that's not necessary because even more than a year after release Cyberpunk 2077 is still one of the most beautiful games on the PC.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5

The stability and optimization of the title are more of a problem. Even with patch 1.5, we had crashes here and there during the test. In addition, there were strange jerks on some systems that could sometimes (but not always) be solved by restarting the game. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 did not run smoothly on our RTX 3080 notebook, which is why we only entered the ray-tracing results.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5

There are still bugs in the options menu. For example, certain settings (including texture quality and DLSS) were not changed correctly on some test systems after switching. In this case, deleting the Cyberpunk files in the Windows "Saved games" folder often helped. Apart from that, the graphics menu is mostly pleasing. As we already know before patch 1.5, there are a lot of settings in the Video and especially Graphics tabs, which are usually applied directly. Cyberpunk 2077 now occupies around 64 GB on the hard drive. Especially nice: If you want, you can download the game DRM-free from gog.com and install or play it offline.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5

Benchmark

In our opinion, the biggest highlight of patch 1.5 is the added benchmark. While we had to use a separate benchmark scene in the original Cyberpunk 2077, performance measurements are now very comfortable. In the roughly one-minute sequence, the benchmark presents a fancy tracking shot that includes both indoor and outdoor areas with various characters (see video). After the measurement, which only shows the frames per second, a more detailed evaluation including minimum, average, and maximum FPS appears.

Results

For the benchmarks, we mainly use rental devices from our partners at XMG (Schenker Technologies) and MSI are used.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

Although the GPU hunger has improved a bit since the release, Cyberpunk 2077 turns out to be quite computationally intensive even with patch 1.5. Entry-level chips like the Intel Iris Xe are too weak for the RPG even when using minimum options. It has to be a graphics card from the lower mid-range in Full HD (GeForce GTX 1650 upwards) for the Low and Medium presets to run reasonably smoothly (40 FPS+). Meanwhile, the presets High and Ultra require a representative from the upper midrange, such as the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or the RTX 3050 Ti.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
142 (54min) fps ∼37%
136 (74min) fps ∼39%
134 (66min) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
138 (56min) fps ∼36%
134 (69min) fps ∼38%
131 (53min) fps ∼20%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
Asus ROG Strix G15
124 (47min) fps ∼32%
121 (52min) fps ∼34%
119 (45min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
133 (53min) fps ∼34%
116 (72min) fps ∼33%
114 (69min) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
122 (53min) fps ∼32%
95 (73min) fps ∼27%
93 (75min) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
114 (19min) fps ∼29%
98.7 (24min) fps ∼26%
77.7 (18min) fps ∼22%
75.5 (18min) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
85.7 (55min) fps ∼22%
67.8 (46min) fps ∼18%
53.9 (41min) fps ∼15%
51.7 (37min) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
81.9 (42min) fps ∼21%
67.4 (48min) fps ∼17%
51.5 (15min) fps ∼15%
49.9 (24min) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
58.7 (40min) fps ∼15%
46 (33min) fps ∼12%
36 (26min) fps ∼10%
34 (26min) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
51.8 (35min) fps ∼13%
41.3 (30min) fps ∼11%
32 (24min) fps ∼9%
30 (24min) fps ∼4%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
Honor MagicBook 14
17.8 (13min) fps ∼5%
14.4 (11min) fps ∼4%
10.6 (9min) fps ∼3%
10.4 (8min) fps ∼2%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

A high-end accelerator should be under the hood for QHD displays - at least when using higher details. 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and the Ultra-Preset are only available starting from a GeForce RTX 3070.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
    2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
94.8 (63min) fps ∼1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
86.1 (59min) fps ∼1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
62.7 (43min) fps ∼1%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
Asus ROG Strix G15
53.3 (33min) fps ∼1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
48.2 (33min) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
38.8 (26min) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
25 (16min) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
25 (17min) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
16.4 (11min) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
14.9 (10min) fps ∼0%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

Even the strongest notebook and desktop models reach their limits in the 4K range. 3,840 x 2,160 pixels in combination with the Ultra Preset could only be handled by the GeForce RTX 3080 and the RTX 3090 decently.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
    3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
48.6 (33min) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
42.8 (29min) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
30.2 (21min) fps ∼20%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
Asus ROG Strix G15
23.4 (15min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
23.3 (16min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
17.8 (13min) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
10.4 (8min) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
10.3 (7min) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
5.7 (3min) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
5.4 (3min) fps ∼4%

Ray Tracing

It looks similarly steep or even worse when ray tracing is enabled. Only a few GPUs can achieve more than 40 FPS in Full HD, provided that the Ray Tracing Ultra preset is selected. You can currently forget about a combination of UHD and Ray Tracing Ultra without DLSS on all available graphics cards.

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
    1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)     3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
66.4 (46min) fps ∼32%
22.1 (15min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
61.1 (45min) fps ∼30%
12.1 (4min) fps ∼10%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
37.8 (19min) fps ∼18%
10.7 (8min) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
Asus ROG Strix G15
23.5 (16min) fps ∼11%
6.6 (4min) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
43.9 (32min) fps ∼21%
5.4 (3min) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
34.1 (25min) fps ∼17%
3.7 (2min) fps ∼3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
25.6 (9min) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
14.1 (5min) fps ∼7%

Note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often restricted by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with a part of the benchmarks for the publication of the articles. More graphics cards will be installed in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
 Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Preset
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
227n10
223.5n10
214.5n10
210.5n10
159.1n10
80.65n10
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
250n2
240n2
217n2
207.15n2
145.8n2
72.8n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
250n2
246n2
238.5n2
209.5n2
128.15n2
60.9n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
231n2
230.5n2
209.5n2
190.1n3
129.1n3
63.4n3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
219n2
201n2
172.8n2
151.8n2
103.9n2
53.3n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
196.9
195.9
172.3
157.5
103.6
49.7
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
237
212
189.7
178.6
122.4
60
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
235.6n2
218.05n2
185.3n4
166.85n4
105n4
48.35n4
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
207.85n2
183.6n2
157.75n2
148.25n2
97.95n2
44.9n2
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
160.7n2
142.65n2
128.4n2
122n2
93n2
45.85n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.9n7
141.7n8
132.6n13
127.92n20
95.3n21
48.2n16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
207n8
175.6n7
151.3n7
134n9
92.8n7
46.2n7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
219
184.4
160.4
146.4
99.1
49.7
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
258
192.6
160.8
148.1
96.6
43.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
195.7
184.1
159.15n2
143.5n2
92.05n2
44.2n2
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
135
93.3
44.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
149.2n5
142.6n5
124.4n7
121.41n7
81.98n7
39.1n6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
138
134
131
86.1
42.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
215.8
173.8
142.6n2
127.95n2
80.6n2
36.15n2
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6800
135.25n2
115.05n2
103.5n2
98.5n2
73.5n2
33.65n2
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
193
158.2
132
122.1
80.2
36
NVIDIA Titan RTX
78.9
78.7
78.6
78.3
66.2
32.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
178.45n2
141.4n2
123.6n2
112.65n2
72.85n2
35.2n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G
175.6
137.2
114.7
102.6
62.2
27
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G
175n3
137n3
113n3
100.5n3
59.9n3
25.2n3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
135.85n14
123.9n14
101.77n14
91.35n16
56n13
27.71n6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
135.4n13
115n13
97.35n18
86.85n24
54.2n24
23.5n11
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
146.7
139.05n2
126n2
102.15n2
61.65n2
29.6n2
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
164.6n3
127.3n3
108.7n3
97.8n3
60.3n3
25.7n3
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
118.95n2
99.25n2
90.05n2
84.9n2
56n2
24.65n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
124.8n2
106.35n2
91.25n2
82.7n2
47.9
23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
132.1n2
112.75n2
94.5n2
84.15n2
54.35n2
25.4n2
Intel Arc A770
78
70
61.3
58.2
44.5
25.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
139.3
107.4
90.2
79.9
47.7
20.4
AMD Radeon RX 7600
147.5
117.4
100.1
89.9
55.9
24
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
160
135.5
105.8
87.2
55.3n2
26
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
129.3n11
110.9n12
89.35n12
81.3n13
50n10
26.35n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
123.2n13
99.4n13
84.48n16
77.36n18
48.71n13
19.25n4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)
88.8
57.1
30.7
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
122.5
109.75n2
101.5n2
97.95n2
50.7n2
22.75n2
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
127.75n2
108n2
87.65n2
77.55n2
44.15n2
17.85n2
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
78.7
77.9
76.3
68.6
40.2
14.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
118.8n7
107n8
87.5n8
74.15n8
47n7
22.15n4
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
140.8
111n2
82n2
73.8n2
38.75n2
15.9
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
115.9
95.6
81
74.3
47.6
21.7
Intel Arc A750
75.1
66.4
58.3
55
41.5
23.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
79.1
78.1
74.8
64.2
39.1
17.7
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
82.85n2
74n2
65.35n2
57.35n2
36.55n2
17.05n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
94.3n2
84.45n2
78.25n2
72.55n2
47.2n2
22.55n2
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
78
77.6
74.8
67
40.2
17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
103.1n14
86.2n14
69.1n14
62.4n16
38.6n9
14.7n4
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
103
84
69.7
42.9
18.4
Intel Arc A580
73.4
64.5
56.7
53.3
39.2
20.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
87.9n2
78.6n2
70.6n2
62.05n2
39.55n2
18.8n2
Intel Arc A770M
112.5
95.3
77
66.5
44
21.6
AMD Radeon RX 6600
107.45n2
91.35n2
73.4n2
59.25n2
34.25n2
13.85n2
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
83.75n2
74.55n2
66.65n2
58.05n2
35.85n2
15.35n2
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
126.8
106.3
78.9
63.8
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
107.3n3
82.6n3
68.8n3
60.7n3
38.75n2
18.8n2
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
99.1
74
59.7
31.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
105.8
82.7
61.1
60.5
29.8
12.2
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
82.65n2
73.55n2
62.75n2
53.65n2
30.05n2
12.45n2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
77.6
71.1
56.6
46.2
26.9
11.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
75.5n2
62.85n2
51.65n2
48.75n2
26.35n2
11.05n2
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
71.65n2
54.15n2
34.1n2
30.05n2
17.1n2
3.69n2
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
77.5n2
61.1n2
45.05n2
40.4n2
19.95n2
7.85n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.15n12
82n13
69n14
64.55n14
36.83n10
18
Intel Arc A730M
70.5
64.25n2
53.95n2
52.2n2
30.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
85.7
67.8
53.9
51.7
25
10.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62n9
59n9
44.5n9
39.5n9
21.8n4
10.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
80.8
64.2
46.4
38.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
71.45n2
58n2
47.15n2
40.25n2
23.7n2
9.85n2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
63.35n2
49.95n2
39.9n2
33.55n2
19.7n2
3.22n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
65.8n6
52n7
41n7
33.8n7
18.3n2
5.57
AMD Radeon RX 6500M
66.2
66.5
32.3
29.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
37.3
29.5
25
22.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
58.7
46
36
34
16.4
5.7
Intel Arc A370M
46.1
37.1
25.4
21
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
54.55n2
43.2n2
32.8n2
29.5n2
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
47.25n4
41.5n4
29.05n4
25n4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
51.8
41.3
32
30
14.9
5.4
Intel Arc A350M
27.4
18.5
16.2
11.6
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
31.6
27
22.6
21.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
39
30
23
23
4
AMD Radeon 780M
38.95n12
30.55n12
24.4n12
23.15n8
15.8
6.42
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
30.4
24.6
17.2
AMD Radeon 680M
37.7n15
28.1n15
21n15
17.5n15
10.32n2
3.85n2
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
31.85n2
21.85n2
12.6n2
7.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
23.8n2
18.75n2
14.4n2
13.1
AMD Radeon 760M
30
24
18
AMD Radeon 660M
23.65n2
19.5n2
13.6n2
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
22.5
17.3
14.6
13.2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.75n42
16.3n37
12.75n34
10.6n32
6.7
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
16.1
11.2
6.42
5.46
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
9.8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
14.7
11.4
7.3
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
14.1
10.6
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
10.9
6.68
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
14.3n7
12.3n5
10.1n4
8.5n4
6.06
PosModel< PrevNext >Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon 540X
8.6
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
18
14.7
11.3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
12.2
9.2
4.5
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
10.85n2
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9.7
Intel UHD Graphics 770
11n2
9.7
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
17.8n8
13.3n8
8.9n7
8.95n6
4.8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
18.3n4
14.05n4
9.7n4
8.5n3
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
4.2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
9.25n2
8.6
6.3
5
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
7.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
12.5n2
9.7n2
7.35n2
7.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
9.1
Intel UHD Graphics 630
4.9
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5.72
AMD Radeon R5 M255
6
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test systems

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)
XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

Device
Graphics card Processor Memory Operating system
XMG Neo 15 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus ROG Strix G15 AMD Radeon RX 6800M (12 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 11
MSI Prestige 14 Evo Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs) Intel Core i7-1195G7 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 11
Honor MagicBook 14 Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs) Intel Core i7-1165G7 1x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 11
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42 AMD Radeon Vega 7 AMD Ryzen 7 4700U 2 x 4 GB DDR4 Windows 11
Desktop PC I MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X)
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X)
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-9900K 4 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 11
Desktop-PC II Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB GDDR6X)
Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) GDDR6)Nvidia
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6)
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 2 x 32 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC III Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super FE Intel Core i9-11900K 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 11
4K monitors Nvidia drivers AMD drivers
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK ForceWare 511.79 Adrenalin 22.2.3
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2022-03- 7 (Update: 2022-03- 7)