Back 4 Blood in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

Co-op battle against zombie hordes. Back 4 Blood is very reminiscent of the old Left 4 Dead. No wonder, since the shooter comes from the same developer studio. We checked the graphics requirements of the action title with several notebook and desktop GPUs.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/22/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Technology

Back 4 Blood should be a good choice for fans of continuous shooting. The zombie shooter from Turtle Rock Studios sends countless undead and special monsters after the players or in front of the virtual shotgun.

The whole thing happens with a solid technical foundation. The Unreal Engine 4 used is characterized by quite good textures and first-class effects. In addition to the lighting, the particle effects (e.g. for the weapons) and the fire display (flames, explosions, etc.) are also convincing. The package is rounded off by a homogeneous and pleasing graphic style and overall look.

In terms of gameplay, Back 4 Blood is - as mentioned at the beginning - very similar to the Left 4 Dead series, although the developers follow the current trend and focus on customizing. Among other things, we have weapon upgrades, a shopping system and special skill cards. Left 4 Dead meets Warzone, so to speak. The gunplay and movement are also up to date, in our opinion.

In short: If you are looking for a fun and - depending on the difficulty level - quite challenging bullet feast, Back 4 Blood should be a good choice, especially since you can also impersonate the special monsters in multiplayer mode instead of the human players. In single player mode, which unfortunately still requires an online connection, you have to make do with halfway intelligent bots, which is also entertaining for a while.

But back to the technology. In the graphics menu, which you can see further down in two of the screenshots, there are over 20 setting options. Starting with classics like the resolution (unfortunately, only the monitor's native resolution is available in Borderless Fullscreen; conventional Fullscreen doesn't exist), the field of view and Motion Blur, there are also some modern features like upscaling (including DLSS) and Chromatic Aberration.

As edge smoothing, Back 4 Blood supports FXAA and TAA. You can also switch between DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 if necessary. V-Sync and an FPS limit can also be enabled if desired.

Equally praiseworthy is the presence of various presets. The presets take care of the five fold-out quality sliders. Plus points are also given for the fact that setting changes (with the exception of DirectX) do not require a restart and are adopted directly. It would only be nice if the developers would add short text explanations to the individual graphics options.

The game size of around 25 GB turns out to be moderate by today's standards. The in-game loading times are decent. Only the game start takes a bit of time.

Benchmark

In order to get the most consistent results possible, we do not use a mission for the benchmarks, but the lobby camp "Fort Hope", which you enter between missions. According to our experience, the frame rate of the benchmark sequence matches the real missions quite well. Although there can be significant performance fluctuations or drops in the latter depending on the number of zombies and the amount of effects, the average frame rate is similarly high (missions 1 and 2 of the first act were checked for 200 seconds each on an RTX 3070 with maximum details).

With the help of the CapFrameX tool, we recorded a 30-second sprint through the warehouse, which contains various objects, figures and fire elements. Since this is a fast first-person shooter, the system should reach an average of at least 40 FPS or - to be better prepared for particularly CPU-intensive and image-intensive situations - more than 60 FPS.

Results

For the benchmarks, we mainly use loan devices from our partners at XMG (Schenker Technologies) and MSI.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

In contrast to other current games, Back 4 Blood does not necessarily require a real gaming computer. Entry-level GPUs on the level of the GeForce MX450 can at least handle 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and the Low preset. The Medium preset would also be possible with some compromises. Midrange graphics cards like the GeForce GTX 1650 (Ti) can easily cope with the High and Epic presets in Full HD.

Back 4 Blood
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) AA:T 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	378 (26.3^min, 184^P0.1, 235^P1) fps ∼50% 281 (44.4^min, 139^P0.1, 180^P1) fps ∼43% 235 (38.8^min, 121^P0.1, 148^P1) fps ∼40% 220 (43.6^min, 105^P0.1, 141^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	377 (30.5^min, 185^P0.1, 239^P1) fps ∼50% 273 (40^min, 150^P0.1, 194^P1) fps ∼42% 227 (31.9^min, 137^P0.1, 162^P1) fps ∼39% 209 (25.9^min, 118^P0.1, 146^P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	332 (75.7^min, 152^P0.1, 189^P1) fps ∼44% 300 (70.7^min, 139^P0.1, 173^P1) fps ∼46% 274 (67.3^min, 113^P0.1, 144^P1) fps ∼47% 272 (75.9^min, 122^P0.1, 150^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	321 (56^min, 155^P0.1, 187^P1) fps ∼43% 295 (120^min, 145^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼45% 260 (30.6^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼44% 248 (62.8^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	317 (136^min, 155^P0.1, 190^P1) fps ∼42% 290 (116^min, 129^P0.1, 168^P1) fps ∼45% 273 (97.6^min, 120^P0.1, 154^P1) fps ∼47% 270 (77.4^min, 119^P0.1, 149^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	288 (23.2^min, 93^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼38% 212 (18.5^min, 65.8^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼33% 181 (51.7^min, 67.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼31% 163 (57.4^min, 84.7^P0.1, 113^P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	205 (22.6^min, 106^P0.1, 134^P1) fps ∼27% 152 (55.7^min, 87.1^P0.1, 96.8^P1) fps ∼23% 123 (26.3^min, 48.7^P0.1, 78^P1) fps ∼21% 114 (59.4^min, 61.4^P0.1, 70.2^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	197 (24.8^min, 96.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼26% 146 (57.2^min, 75.2^P0.1, 97.6^P1) fps ∼22% 126 (57.9^min, 70.9^P0.1, 83.4^P1) fps ∼21% 115 (63.4^min, 64.9^P0.1, 73.4^P1) fps ∼19%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	184 (44.8^min, 105^P0.1, 118^P1) fps ∼24% 137 (32.2^min, 69.2^P0.1, 78.3^P1) fps ∼21% 117 (6.13^min, 55.3^P0.1, 65.8^P1) fps ∼20% 110 (52.7^min, 55.6^P0.1, 59.4^P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	157 (26.9^min, 89.7^P0.1, 100^P1) fps ∼21% 106 (51.3^min, 57.1^P0.1, 63.7^P1) fps ∼16% 91.5 (47.3^min, 48.1^P0.1, 54.2^P1) fps ∼16% 83.8 (45.5^min, 45.8^P0.1, 49.7^P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	147 (22.1^min, 84.5^P0.1, 92.3^P1) fps ∼19% 96 (31.8^min, 51^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps ∼15% 82.3 (41.8^min, 44.8^P0.1, 49.4^P1) fps ∼14% 75 (38.7^min, 40.3^P0.1, 43.8^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	77 (22.8^min, 27.1^P0.1, 41.8^P1) fps ∼10% 46.3 (13.5^min, 18.1^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps ∼7% 35.3 (11.8^min, 12.1^P0.1, 14.9^P1) fps ∼6% 33 (13.4^min, 14.1^P0.1, 15.2^P1) fps ∼6%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

The latter mid-range GPUs can even theoretically handle a mix of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and maximum details, although we would recommend a model from the upper mid-range for an all-round smooth gaming experience (e.g. the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or the Radeon RX 5600M).

Back 4 Blood
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	241 (76.5^min, 101^P0.1, 139^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	223 (67.7^min, 98^P0.1, 132^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	179 (59.9^min, 90.4^P0.1, 117^P1) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	146 (25.2^min, 53^P0.1, 101^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	140 (39.1^min, 56.1^P0.1, 89.9^P1) fps ∼24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	111 (19.8^min, 31.8^P0.1, 69.4^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	75 (26.3^min, 27.7^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	74.3 (25.1^min, 26.4^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps ∼13%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	71.4 (30.5^min, 31.3^P0.1, 35.5^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	52.7 (22.8^min, 25.9^P0.1, 28.1^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	49.1 (23.9^min, 24.2^P0.1, 26.2^P1) fps ∼8%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

3,840 x 2,160 pixels in combination with the Epic preset, on the other hand, should only be unleashed on a high-end representative (GeForce RTX 3060 upwards). The VRAM requirements of the title generally seem to be within limits. 6 GB are sufficient for all common resolutions and quality levels.

Back 4 Blood
3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	151 (53.3^min, 67.3^P0.1, 103^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	131 (48.9^min, 55.3^P0.1, 87.5^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	96.4 (44.5^min, 50.9^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	76.6 (15.4^min, 21.6^P0.1, 45.9^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	71.7 (31.9^min, 34.3^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	57.2 (14^min, 16.4^P0.1, 30.9^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	37.4 (19.3^min, 19.5^P0.1, 20.1^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	37.3 (14.4^min, 18.1^P0.1, 19.3^P1) fps ∼8%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	36.3 (14.9^min, 15.2^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	26.1 (12.4^min, 12.5^P0.1, 13^P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	23.3 (11.3^min, 11.5^P0.1, 12.3^P1) fps ∼5%

Note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often hindered by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with a part of the benchmarks for the publication of the articles. More graphics cards will be installed in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Test system

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

Device	Graphics card	Processor	Memory	Operating system
XMG Neo 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	Nvidia GeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-11370H	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Dell G5 15 SE	AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC I	MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop-PC II	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6)Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K monitors	Nvidia driver	AMD driver
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 496.13	Adrenalin 21.10.2

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Sebastian Jentsch - Managing Editor Consumer Laptops - 1753 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2010

Computers always had an important place in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, especially in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a division of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became self-employed in 2010 and took the next logical step in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.

contact me via: Xing

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Back 4 Blood in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2021-10-22 (Update: 2021-10-22)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Back 4 Blood (2021)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset (DX12)	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) FXAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	QHD 2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	4K 3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA
12	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	403		309	309	327
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090		302.5ⁿ²	284ⁿ²	278.5ⁿ²	236ⁿ²	141ⁿ²
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		345	295	276	188.4	112
25	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		290	273	270	223	131
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800		306	292	273	199	100
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX		294	270	255	182	101
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		294	263	238	171	88.9
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		252	221	209	129.4	73.7
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		295	260	248	179	96.4
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT		262	227	207	145	72
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		281	235	220	146	76.6
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		220ⁿ²	192.05ⁿ²	181.9ⁿ²	122.45ⁿ²	63.9
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		245	197.5	188.2
57	AMD Radeon RX 6800M		170	151	152
59	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT		228	188	168	110	56.3
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		246.5ⁿ²	216ⁿ²	201ⁿ²	140	71.7
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		230	198	182	119	58.9
67	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060		214	191	178	115	57.4
74	AMD Radeon RX 6700M		195	163	149
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal		219	191	177	121	64.9
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)		237	213	193	129	66.3
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)		218	185	170	114	59.5
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	293	201ⁿ²	170ⁿ³	153ⁿ³	107.5ⁿ²	55.25ⁿ²
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		186.9	155.2	146	94.7	48.4
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)		190	173	156	103	52.9
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600		197	166	145	90.4	46
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)		183	157	146	96.9	49.1
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M			189	172	124
107	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		200	171.3	157.3	92.4
132	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050		158	135	125	82.9	41.5
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)		172	150	138	91.9	48
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)		154	140	126	80.3	39
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT		140	117	109	68.1	27.7
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)		121	103	93.6	62.2	30.8
145	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	332	221	166.1	155.3
148*	Intel Arc A730M		132.9	115.4	105.9	68.3
150	AMD Radeon RX 5600M		137	117	110	71.4	36.3
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		146	126	115	74.3	37.4
153	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		147.4ⁿ²	123.4ⁿ²	115.1ⁿ²	75	37.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)		140	124	113	71.2	34.6
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)		128	113	102	63.7	30
167	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	247	138	112	103
173	AMD Radeon RX 6500M		116	95.3	92.7
186	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		107	89.6	81.1
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		106	91.5	83.8	52.7	26.1
189	AMD Radeon RX 5500M		92.5	77.4	72.3
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	155	82.4	65.8	65.3
201	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)		96.5	84.9	77.8	48.4	23.2
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		96	82.3	75	49.1	23.3
224*	Intel Arc A350M	139.3	60.2	48.1	46	31	14.9
249	AMD Radeon 680M	167	65.2	54.4	49.3
255*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	128.3	46.6ⁿ²	32.35ⁿ²	29.85ⁿ²
270	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		43.7	40.4	32.4
283	AMD Radeon 660M	104.3	40.4	34.3
294	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	118	49.7	41.5	36.9
316	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	60.2ⁿ²	36.95ⁿ²	32.55ⁿ²	33.7
317	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	99.6	37.2	29.2	26.5
326	AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	66.1	19.6	14.2	13.9
332	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	73.4	29.9	24.6	23.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
334	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	76.9	27.6	24	23.5
337	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	45.5ⁿ²	24.4ⁿ²	22.85ⁿ²	19.8ⁿ²
359*	AMD Radeon 540X	62.7	21.9	18.3
381*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	46.6	20	17.1
382*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	54.2	22.6	18.8	16.8
418*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	34.8ⁿ³	18.2ⁿ³	14.9ⁿ³	13.2
420*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	32.7	15.6
421	Intel UHD Graphics 770	34.7	17.4	13.4
431*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	94.4ⁿ²	29.5ⁿ³	24.6ⁿ³	21.5ⁿ³	15.5	7.53
440	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	65.45ⁿ²	31.15ⁿ²	24.75ⁿ²	21.85ⁿ²
457	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	35.7	19.5	15.4	13.6
461	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	51.2	17.9	14.9	13.6
464	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	46	16.7	11.6
582*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	49.5	10.2
583*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	51.6	18.3	15.7
584	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	25.2	11.2
585	Intel UHD Graphics 630	21.3	8.71
587*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	19	9.27
595	Intel UHD Graphics 620	19.5
668	AMD Radeon R5 M255	31.6	10.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
669*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	31.45ⁿ²	11.5ⁿ²	9.96
722*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	12.8

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.