Asus PU551JH Workstation Review
For the original German review, see here.
A mobile workstation from Asus? For less than 1,000 Euros (~$1098)? Not that we would think that Asus is not capable of doing so but it is quite a surprise to find such a relatively exotic model unannounced in the price lists. Without making a big scene, Asus has introduced a laptop that has equipment which is even difficult to come by in second-hand or phase-out models on sale for such a price.
To do so, Asus takes advantage of a method that other manufacturers have been putting into practice for quite some time: Take an already existing chassis, equip it with a professional graphics unit and claim the result as mobile workstation. Examples for this practice are the Dell Precision M2800, the Lenovo ThinkPad W550s, the HP ZBook 14 or the Toshiba Tecra W50. Admittedly, the ASUSPRO PU551 series has already been around for some time and represents an inexpensive midrange model for business demands. Prices for weaker-equipped versions range between around 400 and 650 Euros (~$439 and ~$713). Our test sample is therefore the top model of the series and equipped with a viewing-angle stable and matte Full HD Display, an Nvidia Quadro K1100M, 8 GB RAM, an Intel Core i5-4210M processor and a conventional 500 GB hard drive.
Popular online retailers are currently starting prices at around 920 euros (~$1010). As mentioned before, this is a real declaration of war and might cause disturbances in the established market. A comparably equipped Lenovo ThinkPad W541 starts at around 1,500 Euros (~$1647), Dell demands about 1,400 Euros (~$1537, gross) for a Precision M2800 (FirePro W4170M, HD display) and an HP ZBook 15 G2 (however, with Intel Core i5-4340M), which was configured in the HP shop, costs more than 2,800 Euros (~$3075).
Case
Asus has previously proven that they offer quite sturdy and well manufactured business laptops. According to advertising claims, the ASUSPRO PU551 is supposed to "exceed the common industry standards regarding stability, reliability and sturdiness." It is not mentioned though which standards they mean exactly. The Asus PU551's case makes a significantly slimmer and flatter impression in the product photos than in reality. This can easily be revealed when having a look at the product dimensions (380 x 256 x 36 mm) and the weight of 2.5 kg. Asus has skillfully concealed the actual case dimensions with a slanted surface at the bottom and hence achieves at least visually very slim side parts.
Our test sample is impeccably manufactured and has a very appealing look due to the modest black coloration. Spots of color, chrome or glossy surfaces are nowhere to be found. This underlines the understatement claim of the business clientele and should generally be accepted. The palm rest and the display lid are furnished with a finely structured, brushed design and this gives the ASUSPRO PU551JH a premium-quality look. Unfortunately, these areas are also very susceptible to dust and fingerprints and therefore require regular maintenance.
As promised by the manufacturer, the good optical impression extends to a solid quality standard. The palm rest is tight, the base unit is sturdy and the keyboard can only slightly be bent in the middle when applying pressure. Even the often critical areas above the battery slot and above the optical drive have been stabilized successfully by Asus. The display lid is relatively thin and can be twisted under force. Nevertheless, it makes a solid and tough impression. Image interferences did not occur with the test sample under normal levels of strain.
Connectivity
The connectivity of the ASUSPRO PU551 is a good basis but lacks typical business interfaces such as DisplayPort, docking connection or Thunderbolt. However, outdated VGA displays can be easily connected, which is not self-evident anymore, even in the business segment. The interface layout turns out to be rather inconvenient in our opinion. 4x USB 3.0, HDMI, LAN and the combined audio jack are positioned at the very front of both sides. Connected cables and peripherals often get in the way and are thus bothersome when working. A conventional dockingport could provide a remedy but is not available. The card-reader works in the USH-I standard and theoretically offers data rates of up to 104 MB/s. In our test with our Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II SDHC card it achieved a maximum of 86 MB/s and therefore provides a good performance. The actual potential of the memory card can, however, only be accessed by a USH-II card-reader, which allows speeds of more than 200 MB/s. When connecting an external Samsung T1 SSD via USB 3.0 port, we have established maximum reading speeds of 263 MB/s and writing speeds of 299 MB/s.
Communication
With Gigabit LAN, 802.11ac WLAN and Bluetooth 4.0, the communication equipment covers the current standards. The 1 MP webcam, however, only suffices in well-lit rooms with slow moving objects. The worse the lighting conditions, the stronger the image noise, color deviations, smearing and inverting are. A modem for cellular communication is not available for this series.
Security
The ASUSPRO PU551 offers business security equipment that is common for entry-level models. Fingerprint reader, TPM chip and the well-known password security on BIOS and system level are on board. Additionally, an Asus Shockshield hard-drive protection, splash water protection of the keyboard and a Kensington lock connection are supposed to protect the laptop from physical damage. The sensitivity of the hard-drive protection can be adjusted to personal needs with the Asus HDD Protection Tool.
Accessories
The system specific accessory choice, which is typical for business notebooks, is limited to a bigger 87-Wh battery for the ASUSPRO PU551. Modular drives, proprietary docking stations or other special accessories are not part of Asus' configuration list. If necessary, the user has to fall back on all-round solutions.
Maintenance
As addressed before, the manual does not contain any information on how to open the case and exchange specific components. The rather common maintenance hatches for the main and mass memory are also missing. We have refrained from any further checks since our test sample is a rental device from an online retailer, which is still supposed to go on sale.
Warranty
Asus grants for the ASUSPRO PU551 a 2-year manufacturer's warranty and for the battery a 1-year warranty. The manufacturer's warranty can, for example, be extended for around 80 Euros (~$87) from 2 to 3 years. Concerning defective pixels on the display, the rule is rather strict and up to 8 defective pixels are still seen as tolerable for the customer. As usual, damages caused by the customer or unauthorized personnel are not covered. If in doubt about Asus allowing component upgrades, the customer support should be contacted. We could not find a list of components which can be replaced or added by the customer. However, the 136-page digital manual contains many operating instructions for beginners and a short introduction to Windows 8.
Input Devices
Keyboard
Asus puts special emphasis on the quality of the built-in input devices, which is a good thing, since the interfaces with the user are of especially great importance in the business area. The keyboard is comprised of 102 keys in a 19 mm grid and comes by default with a separate numeric keypad. The ratio, the layout and the integrated special functions are conceived in a practice-oriented way. The small arrow keys, which are also too close to each other, are the only part that requires getting used to. Asus calls the keyboard of the PU 551 "Comfort Keyboard" and tries to achieve a comfortable feeling when typing by optimizing the key stroke. Indeed, the keyboard is suitable for frequent typists, and it delivers a precise pressure point and rests tightly on the whole surface. We could not ascertain any display bounce or sagging of individual keys under normal use. The typing speed is high right from the start and appeals with a modest tapping sound. The only drawback of the splash water-protected keyboard is the missing backlighting. This practical feature should be self-evident in such a price and product class, making it the first real gaffe of the test device.
Touchpad
The touchpad offers a relatively big input surface of 107 x 61 mm. It possesses separate touchpad keys with good operability. A few common two- and three-finger gestures, like rotating objects or navigating through applications and sites can be configured in the Asus Smart Gesture Tool. The gliding characteristics are good; however, the precision cannot win us over completely. Additionally, the cursor jumps from time to time and finger input is not always interpreted correctly.
Display
The ASUSPRO PU551JH is currently the only version of the series that does not come with a standard display with 1366x768 pixels but a Full HD display (1920x1080 pixels). Apart from the in practice more suitable resolution, Asus also promises wide viewing angles, a high brightness and a good contrast. Indeed, Asus installs a high-grade display that is convincing in many respects.
Unfortunately, this is not true for the external connectivity. Since Asus has treated the PU551JH to "only" an HDMI 1.4 port, 4k displays can merely be connected with 30 Hz instead of 60 Hz. Although this still allows using all of the 3840x2160 pixels on an external monitor, fast movements from windows show clearly visible streaks, which are down to the lower refresh rate. We used a 27-inch Viewsonic VP2780-4k for the test, which delivers a perfectly fine image in combination with a nominally less powerful Acer Revo One RL 85 (Intel HD Graphics 5500) thanks to DisplayPort (read the review of the Viewsonic VP2780-4k here).
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 864:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
The display brightness of the ASUSPRO PU551JH achieves on average a maximum of 318 cd/m² and is hence very well qualified to be used outside as well. The illumination lies at a solid 88% and subjectively creates a homogenous brightness distribution. Minor bleeding around the perimeter is visible; however, we could not ascertain noticeable clouding even with plain-colored images. The display brightness can be adjusted adequately precisely in 10 steps of 16 cd/m² up to the maximum setting. We measured 145 cd/m² on step 6, which we have also used for some of our battery tests. The black value of 0.39 cd/m² results in combination with the maximum luminance in a contrast of 864:1. The displayable colors cover 97% of the sRGB color space, which is a great value for a notebook display. To put the result into perspective, the desktop monitor Viewsonic VP2780-4k, which is designed for CAD, video and image tasks, also reaches 97% of the sRGB color space. Currently, only RGB LED displays achieve a noticeably bigger color space, regardless of stationary or mobile computers.
When going outside, the matte display surface and the maximum brightness, which is also available in battery mode, make a good impression. To achieve this level of brightness you must choose the appropriate power plan, since Asus' energy management limits the maximum to 108 cd/m² in power-saver mode. In the balanced plan as well as the high performance plan no limitations exist. Otherwise, you need to adjust the display when working under the clear sky, to avoid being disturbed by direct sunlight. Although this allows reading the image content, it still strains more than usual when working for longer periods of time.
Another issue that is of special importance to image editors besides color-space coverage is an exact color display. Like many times before, the test sample cannot be worked with accurately with factory settings. Even the Asus Splendid Utility does not change this fundamentally. At least with its settings normal, vivid, cinema and manual it allows a simple configuration of the color temperature. At a maximum DeltaE 2000 of 7.57 regarding combination colors and 7.59 for white on delivery, the results are far from the boundary values 3 and 5.
After calibration, we receive a completely different picture revealing the true potential of the display. An even-tempered RGB balance, a close to perfect gamma curve and DeltaE 2000 values of a maximum of 1.74 make the device almost a role model and will certainly make many customers happy.
The viewing-angle stability is at a high level, which is typical for IPS panels. Barely any color or brightness changes occur horizontally or vertically. Inverting or fading, as is familiar from cheap TN panels, is unknown to this IPS solution. Only at acute angles from above are you able to notice visible changes, which are in practice almost irrelevant due to the absolutely nonsensical viewing angle. Please note that this effect shows more than usual in the viewing-angle pictures due to the display brightness that is reflected from the base unit.
Performance
According to the specifications, Asus basically offers three different processors for the ASUSPRO PU551JH: You can choose between an Intel Core i3-4000M, an Intel Core i5-4210M and the quad-core Intel Core i7-4712MQ. On top of that there are several storage solutions and the Nvidia Optimus combination consisting of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Nvidia Quadro K1100M. The reviewed configuration with i5 processor, 8 GB RAM and a 500 GB hard drive is currently the only one that can be ordered with a professional graphics card.
Processor
The Intel Core i5-4210M is a classic dual-core processor with a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 watts. It can process up to 4 threads simultaneously and reaches a maximum clock speed of 3.2 GHz in turbo mode.
In comparison to ultra low voltage processors, which can also be found in slimline workstations, the clock frequencies turn out to be consistently high especially under constant load resulting in more steadfastness. In comparison to quad-core CPUs, which are often found in standard workstations, it is especially the multithread performance that falls behind significantly. On the bright side, the difference in the single-thread performance, which is by a few hundred MHz lower, is barely noticeable in practice. The Cinebench R10 64-bit CPU rendering returns, for example, 5,582 points (single) and 12,149 points (multi).
One strong suit of the standard CPU, especially when compared to the ULV alternative, is the unabated performance. In our stress test (Furmark + Prime95), which the ASUSPRO PU551JH had to endure for more than 4 hours as an exception, no speed reduction occurred. The dual-core processor exemplarily processes one task after the other at a consistent 3.1 GHz.
In battery mode, Asus does not put the system on a leash. Apart from minor differences, we once again obtained the same results as in the regular tests with the power supply. Cinebench R11.5 (multi) resulted, for example, in 3.30 instead of 3.34 points.
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad W550s 20E2-000PGE | |
HP ZBook 15 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 |
System Performance
In terms of system performance two things immediately strike the eye: For one, the main memory runs in single-channel mode because only one RAM module of 8 GB is installed. Apart from the lower memory speed, this affects the performance of the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600, since it does not have its own graphics memory but has to rely on the main memory with the shared-memory method. The alternative graphics option is the dedicated Nvidia Quadro, which has its own 2 GB GDDR5 graphics memory. The other issue is the conventional hard drive installed in the test sample, which is unable to convince us with its access times and data transfer rates in comparison to modern solid state drives. In principle, the test device copes with many tasks but the user will often notice the hesitant responding qualities of the 500 GB hard drive during everyday use. Thus the PCMark 8 Creative result is a meager 2,399 points and that of PCMark 8 Work is 3,311 points.
PCMark 7 Score | 2905 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2343 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2399 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3311 points | |
Help |
Storage Solution
Conventional hard drives still have two important strong suits: The price and the available storage capacity are the main benefits as opposed to the considerably faster solid state drives. Thus it is especially understandable that ordinary hard drives are still in use for entry-level devices. The ASUSPRO PU551JH, which is very convincing regarding the key properties, falls into the category where Asus apparently had to make cuts in terms of storage solution. A fact that is not uncommon, even in the high-priced workstation segment, but rather an effective tool to keep entry-level prices low. An average data transfer rate of about 100 MB/s (read) and access time of 16.6 ms prove that Asus at least installed one of the faster drives, hence minimizing the possible performance flaws.
Graphics Card
Besides the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600, which is the standard card for less powerful configurations of the ASUSPRO PU 551 series, the ASUSPRO PU551JH is also equipped with a dedicated Nvidia Quadro K1100M. It is a professional solution, equipped with its own BIOS and special drivers that are designed for OpenGL tasks. Certified software guarantees smooth cooperation and promises high reliability as well as precision. Depending on the application an Nvidia Quadro K1100M, which is rather weak on the hardware side, can in fact outdo a more powerful gaming competitor. These special features are tested with the SPECviewperf benchmarks, which cover various typical application examples of CAD programs, 3D design, 3D visualization, oil and gas exploration, and a medical MRI. As always, these benchmarks only serve as indicators for potential performance capabilities in explicit scenarios. The specific software, the particular program version, the installed drivers and many more influences can have a substantial impact on the actual possible performance power.
In comparison with the professional competitors of the entry-level range, the Nvidia Quadro K1100M can often only outshine the Nvidia Quadro K610M in this area. Even AMD's entry-level graphics card FirePro W4170M runs faster in many test scenarios. Nevertheless, the test configuration is worth consideration when an inexpensive entry-level model is wanted and applications used, which are optimized for drivers. For example, the Nvidia Quadro K1100M can often significantly outperform the Nvidia GeForce GTX960M in 6 out of 8 tests in SPECviewperf 12. This time the optimized drivers show through, making the difference in comparison to sheer computing power.
SPECviewperf 12 | |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P |
The fact that Nvidia chips show weak performances when it comes to OpenCL has been known for a long time. For these tasks the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 of the test sample is better suited. For example, in the Luxmark Raytracing test both test scenarios, sala and room, are rendered more than twice as fast with the integrated card. Intel's Quick Sync Video also computes much more efficiently than Nvidia's CUDA concerning video conversions. Once again we measure considerable speed differences in favor of the Intel chip.
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
Wortmann Terra Mobile 1529H | |
Sala GPUs-only (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
MSI WS60 2OJ8H11W7P | |
Wortmann Terra Mobile 1529H |
Conventional DirectX applications, which affect the gaming performance most of the time, depend on sheer computing power. This time the Nvidia Quadro K1100M is outpaced without standing a chance against the above mentioned Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. In the 3DMark 11 test this results in a total score of 1,925 points. The pure graphics performance turns out to be even lower at 1,798 points.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Asus UX501JW-DS71T | |
Dell Precision M2800 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Asus UX501JW-DS71T | |
Dell Precision M2800 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
Asus PU551JH | |
Asus UX501JW-DS71T | |
Dell Precision M2800 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11447 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1925 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 50820 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6559 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1285 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
Depending on the title, some games can be played as long as the user is okay with a reduced resolution and quality. Medium settings should be no problem for most of the titles to achieve acceptable frame rates. Further scores of the Nvidia Quadro K1100M can be found in our comprehensive gaming benchmark list.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 103 | 58 | 40 | 16 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 38 | 31 | 18 | 10 |
GRID: Autosport (2014) | 205 | 75 | 36 | 17 |
Emissions
System Noise
The noise generation is under any load conditions relatively low and rewards the user with a modest and sonorous characteristic. The 31.9 dB(A), which we measured during idle, is owed to the conventional hard drive that drowns out the fan noise with its engine-like sound. When the hard drive turns off after a few minutes, you are left with a sound pressure level of 29.1 dB(A). At medium work load, the system noise remains the same at first. Only after a few minutes does the measured sound pressure level increase to 36.4 dB(A). As soon as the load disappears, the fan speed drops once again to the necessary level. Under full load we mostly measured 40.7 dB(A), which increases to 41.6 dB(A) at short peak periods under consistent load only.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.1 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 31.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.4 / 41.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: PCE-322A (15 cm distance) |
Temperature
The cooling design handles the relatively frugal components rather well and provides a cool case regardless of the situation. Even after more than 4 hours of full load, we measure a peak value of 36.1 °C, which is far from critical. Only the fan outlet is at 49.1 °C as usual somewhat warmer.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Speakers
The sound output of the internal speaker system is, as typical for business notebooks, spare and only delivers basic quality. With too much treble, little mids and no bass at all, the quality merely suffices for simple video chats and Internet clips. If you want more you should fall back on Bluetooth speakers or similar alternatives. The sound is especially insufficient for presentations and screenings. As has been usual for a while, Asus combines the microphone output with the microphone input in a 3.5-mm jack. This is space-efficient but requires an adapter if the user has two separate devices.
Energy Management
Power Consumption
The power consumption turns out to be rather low in comparison to similar notebooks. However, the minimum value of 7.4 watts can only be achieved when the hard drive has switched to hibernation mode. When the display is turned off via the handy FN combination, the measurement drops to 6.9 watts. In this case the Intel graphics card is in charge and all radio adapters deactivated.
In practice, the user should expect around 10 to 13 watts in power-supply mode, since the hard drive, for example, hardly takes a rest while Bluetooth and WLAN are only rarely turned off. At medium load with activated Nvidia graphics, the power consumption rises to 54.7 watts and a maximum of 78.4 watts under full load. Processor and graphics unit run at full speed in this scenario.
The power adapter has a nominal power of 120 watts at its disposal and should therefore provide enough capacity even for potential quad-core configurations in the future.
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Idle | 7.4 / 11.7 / 12.6 Watt |
Load |
54.7 / 78.4 Watt |
Battery Runtime
Besides the modest consumption values, the ASUSPRO PU551JH offers the usual 56-Wh battery capacity. Alternatively, Asus includes an 87-Wh battery in the configuration list. However, we could not ascertain the availability and price at the time of writing. Anyhow, even with the smaller battery the test sample achieves quite practical battery runtimes.
For common tasks such as web browsing via Wi-Fi or watching movies with adjusted brightness (145 cd/m² at level 6) 4.5 hours of runtime is possible. Whenever you require all of its power, the battery is drained in less than 1.5 hours.
When in battery mode, a general speed reduction is not detectable under full load. Various benchmark scores lie level with the regular tests with the power adapter. Hence the ASUSPRO PU551JH has a clear performance advantage over some competitors in battery mode. Part of this list includes the Lenovo ThinkPad W550s or the Lenovo ThinkPad W541.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
Despite some equipment flaws, the ASUSPRO PU551JH presents an appealing, mobile entry-level workstation. The main components add up and form a solid basis for professional tasks.
The display, the keyboard, the system performance and especially the CAD performance provide a well-rounded basis that is satisfactory for many novices as well as amateur design engineers. If you see the ASUSPRO PU551JH as an inexpensive entry-level solution with CAD capabilities, you are at the right place.
After all, the performance suffices to challenge some of the considerably pricier top dogs.
However, the tight-laced corset inevitably harbors some drawbacks concerning the configuration as well, which are ultimately owed to the dirt-cheap price. Asus failed to include a faster solid state drive or a backlit keyboard. Furthermore, the user has to be content with an impractical interface layout as well as some missing business interfaces. Those who come to terms with these flaws receive an overall solid entry-level workstation with great hardware at an extremely fair price.
Asus PU551JH
-
03/17/2016 v5(old)
Tobias Winkler