Average of 5 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus N10E
Source: Gadget Zone
It feels like not so long ago that ASUS was touting the release of their Eee range of super-compact netbooks. As computer technology is ever-shrinking, and laptops of more regular dimensions are getting faster and faster (albeit, in the same sized-case), the netbook decided that it would go the opposite way and fit less processing power into a smaller casing. For a bare, nuts and bolts mobile computer setup, the ASUS N10E netbook is a great, user-friendly choice.
4 von 5, Preis gut, Emissionen mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% emissions: 50%
Source: Minitechnet DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2009
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Com! - 6/09
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2008
Rating: mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% emissions: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/21/2008
Rating: price: 40% performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 30% display: 50% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 90%
Source: Benchmark.pl PL→EN
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 30% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games). These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
Power efficient, cheap and slow Netbook single core CPU. Because of the in-order execution, the performance per MHz is worse than Core Solo or Celeron M processors.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This is a typical display size for tablets and small convertibles.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated, a Taiwanese multinational company, produces motherboards, graphics cards, optical drives, PDAs, computer monitors, notebook computers, servers, networking products, mobile phones, computer cases, computer components, and computer cooling systems. The company's 2007 revenues reached US$6.9 billion. ASUS also produces components for other manufacturers. The Eee PC initiated the netbook boom in 2008.
In the notebook sector, Asus had a global market share of about 11% from 2014-2016, making it the fourth largest laptop manufacturer. In the smartphone sector, Asus is not among the Top 5 and has only a small market share (as of 2016).
82%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.